Started By
Message

re: Marcus Davenport Questionable for his 1st game with Vikings

Posted on 9/9/23 at 12:50 pm to
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8813 posts
Posted on 9/9/23 at 12:50 pm to
Peat because if we hadn’t given him that contract we could have kept Trey Hendrickson.
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38570 posts
Posted on 9/10/23 at 8:12 am to
Surprise, surprise, surprise!!!!


The one constant in an ever changing and fluid world.
Posted by Chrome
Chromeville
Member since Nov 2007
13573 posts
Posted on 9/10/23 at 9:38 am to
For as many times he has had medical issues you think he would have considered a career change.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34950 posts
Posted on 9/10/23 at 10:31 am to
Have been saying it forever.

Davenport doesn't love football.

If he actually cared and perfected his craft he could be great.
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
34950 posts
Posted on 9/10/23 at 10:35 am to
quote:

Our desperation to win one more ring with Brees is why we still have Peat. Kc wanted him, but we couldn't afford a whole turnover on the OL



Peat was a Payton guy, plain and simple.

They could've easily signed another guard if they wanted to. Teams do it all the time.

Kansas city won a super bowl and adjusted their o line.

Peat will be gone after this year unless he signs for a extremely team friendly deal. I think Allen is done with him.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram