Started By
Message

re: Kamara catch was incomplete. Should have been ruled as so

Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:59 pm to
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/16/24 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

Your argument is nonsensical.


Maybe

But I’m not laughing at you.

So
In the field of play
You must “possess” the ball with two feet down and make a football move

I didn’t see that happen
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 12:28 am to

If Kamara was hit after his first foot was down and the ball came out on the field


Would it be an incomplete pass

Or a fumble?
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13058 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 10:54 am to
quote:

You must have two feet in bounds with possession of the ball at the same time.


This type of play has been miscalled for many years

So tell me you don't know the rules. The NFL has miscalled it for years, but you know better?
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 1:31 pm to

He didn’t have possession when the first foot hit the ground for a millisecond
Posted by jawnybnsc
Greer, SC
Member since Dec 2016
5541 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:41 pm to
If he was hit and lost the ball before completing the catch, then it's an incomplete pass.
Posted by jawnybnsc
Greer, SC
Member since Dec 2016
5541 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:43 pm to
You're completely confused. Unless he bobbles the ball, from the time the ball hits his hand, to the time he takes a few steps after crossing the goal line, he is in the process of catching the ball. He completed the process without ever losing control of the ball.
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
5826 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 2:51 pm to
And the Saints didn’t really have those last three seconds to score final TD but refs gave it to them.
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21961 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:49 pm to
quote:


He didn’t have possession when the first foot hit the ground for a millisecond


Here you go Rohan. Take your L and move along.







Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70669 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 3:58 pm to
Its a catch. What's the issue?
Posted by Mouth
Member since Jan 2008
21961 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:00 pm to
I just posted clear evidence that by rule, it’s a catch and TD.

Now we can all laugh at Rohans complete meltdown.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
70669 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 4:04 pm to
Very stubborn like Chad it seems.
Posted by RazzleDazzle
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2018
1384 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 5:25 pm to
You probably think the no-call wasn't interference.
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22806 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 8:24 pm to
quote:

He possessed it in one hand with one foot down and then got the second foot in while he secured it with both hands never losing possession.


This. He literally caught it one handed. He didn’t need ti bring it in to his body to control it.
Posted by moneyg
Member since Jun 2006
59311 posts
Posted on 12/17/24 at 9:17 pm to
quote:

If Kamara was hit after his first foot was down and the ball came out on the field


Would it be an incomplete pass

Or a fumble?



An incomplete pass, obviously.
Posted by MasterKnight
Louisiana
Member since Jan 2016
1984 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 4:16 pm to
He had possession when his 2nd foot was in bounds. That is all that matters. He caught with one foot. Gained possession when crossing the goal line and 2nd foot coming inbounds.

Have you not watched football?
Posted by paulb52
Member since Dec 2019
5826 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 5:20 pm to
Several snafus by the officials in this game makes you wonder what’s really going on.
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:08 pm to
Thank you for proving my point


The ball was moving
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

He had possession when his 2nd foot was in bounds.



Yes

He didn’t have possession when his first foot was in bounds
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

This.

He literally caught it one handed. He didn’t need ti bring it in to his body to control it.


Thanks to your friend that posted the best replay

It shows the ball was clearly moving
Posted by Rohan Gravy
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2017
19421 posts
Posted on 12/18/24 at 10:16 pm to
Thank you Mouth for the excellent replay

The ball was moving

No possession

No catch

Why can’t y’all see the obvious?
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram