re: Fully loaded 9mm found in Smiths car

You laughing at that is rich, considering you've been wrong 3x today after hammering your points over and over again.

quote:

---

for sure his gun wasn't registered

---

Tell me about all those laws requiring guns to be registered in LA.

do you need a warrant to search a vehicle? as in look in the general area of a vehicle and remove any evidence etc

or just a warrant if you want to look in a compartment in the car?

quote:

---

Wrong once. But whatever makes you feel better about being a dumbass.

---

well you had your massive failure with the traffic

you couldnt subtract :28 from :08


and then there is this gem.





you are becoming a caricature of yourself. It's almost sad at this point

The post you posted an image of is wrong now? So you know where the gun was found? Nice try hero.

ERA: and at you saying I can't do math. May as well say I'm ok with beating women while you're saying stupid things.

quote:

---

Really?


Reply

OptionsTop

---

Would have 5 people up voted my post if it wasn't true?

There was no visible gun. Nothing to say that Dmith was the aggressor with the weapons. You failed.

quote:

---

do you need a warrant to search a vehicle? as in look in the general area of a vehicle and remove any evidence etc

---

Unless it was out in plain view then a warrant was going to be needed. All vehicles (Smith's, Hayes' & black Impala) were still private property. Your vehicle is an extension of your home. Just like a warrant would still be needed to venture into any area of a home that wasn't an immediate part of the crime scene, the same remains here. If anything outside immediate view were found without a warrant, those items wouldn't be admissible in court. That's why warrants were gotten to search all 3 vehicles involved thoroughly.

quote:

---

Unless it was out in plain view then a warrant was going to be needed. All vehicles (Smith's, Hayes' & black Impala) were still private property. Your vehicle is an extension of your home. Just like a warrant would still be needed to venture into any area of a home that wasn't an immediate part of the crime scene, the same remains here. If anything outside immediate view were found without a warrant, those items wouldn't be admissible in court. That's why warrants were gotten to search all 3 vehicles involved thoroughly.

---

Wow, so that means there is no way the guns found were visible, doesn't it. But I was wrong about that? Right LE?

I haven't seen where anyone has said that he plans to plea self defense. In fact, a reporter asked his attorney this yesterday and he avoided the question. If I had to guess, I'd say the attorney will try for a lower charge; perhaps manslaughter based on the preceding confrontation and things Smith may have said.

The fact that Hayes had two guns (revolver in the vehicle and the murder weapon) sort of makes it a stretch that Smiths unbrandished, unfired, well hidden gun would be an issue for him.