Started By
Message

re: For those that honestly believe this is a conspiracy

Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:50 am to
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

Your argument doesn't hold weight. Those no calls were in crunch time and are way more severe than your simple penalty count




They had no calls too, Jones. Goff got his face mask yanked, no call, they settled for a FG instead of 1st & goal at the 1.

So i mean what are we really saying here? a 4 point swing is a huge deal in a game that went into Overtime
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:51 am
Posted by P bean
br
Member since Dec 2006
4759 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:52 am to
Dude, it’s 2018, I guarantee you the NFL can communicate with the refs the entire game and decide what they want to happen as the game plays out they don’t have to pre-determine what they want.

It’s not like they have to come up with a preset plan and then shift the rest of the way to make sure they follow that plan, they adjust the cheating as they go bro, watch the fricking season and the games and then you’ll understand, going all the way back to the AFC championship last year you fricktard.
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:54 am
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
59946 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:52 am to
quote:

The focus is not on this single play, rather the fact that the game was somehow rigged or was not called in the Saints' favor.


All that you say is immediately bullshite BECAUSE of that one play.

It was a willfully ignored call that singled handedly would have put the saints in the super bowl. Period.

The worst refereeing in NFL history. We aren’t discussing a normal blown call or a typical mistake.

We are discussing why the NFL willfully kept the saints from winning because of one of the most obviously ignore “multiple foul” calls ever (targeting was the most obvious)

WHEN they had three ways to correct it AFTER the play. WHY sit on the ignored call when they have ways to get the call correct?

Explain why?
This post was edited on 1/22/19 at 9:55 am
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Tgat doesn't mean shite when you have multiple no calls against you.
Wait, your argument is that if someone is saying the refs literally cheated to keep the Saints from winning that 3 penalties the entire game means nothing?

So the refs were tasked with cheating but called 3 penalties on teh Saints and allowed the game to come down to a 48 yard FG that if missed, the refs would have failed at their job?

Is that really the argument you want to make, or would you like to change it to one that makes sense?
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22788 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Dude, it’s 2018, I guarantee you the NFL can communicate with the refs the entire game and decide what they want to happen as the game plays out they don’t have to pre-determine what they want.


Okay, so why did the NFL wait until the last drive to call in the fix? You understand how silly this sounds, right?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:56 am to
quote:

I am by no means prone to assigning "conspiracy" motives behind things that happen. But at the same time, when 2 different refs (with a possible third ref) in a position to see the play and none of them throw a flag... imo you would be foolishly naive not consider the possibility..

3 penalties 20 yards


Refs wait to make the most egregious possible call, and the Saints are still near 80% to win, but the refs who wanted the Saints to lose didn't bother to call any other calls earlier in the game to ensure that?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:57 am to
Ive never seen you out of character. Impressive melt.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:57 am to
quote:

No calls are a lot easier way to screw a team. You take away a down essentially and there's no chance to make it up.
Holding on a lineman, and defenisve holding are super easy to call.

Why wouldn't they call a couple of those to ensure they don't have to rely on a kicker to make a FG to go to OT, then to hope the Saints don't score a TD in OT?
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:57 am to
You let things slide here and there. You don't just hammer them with penalties in the first quarter on every drive

Let me ask you this. You think games are ever fixed in pro sports?
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
59946 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Okay, so why did the NFL wait until the last drive to call in the fix?


Because it was the best one? Because it was the necessary one? Because, imagine how desperate the refereeing would have to look to ensure the Rams stayed in the game as the game went on...on wait...

You realize you are actually proving his point right?
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
287659 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Dude, it’s 2018, I guarantee you the NFL can communicate with the refs the entire game and decide what they want to happen as the game plays out they don’t have to pre-determine what they want.



Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
59946 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Ive never seen you out of character. Impressive melt.


Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:59 am to
It's called the favorable outcome. If the Saints overcome it, so be it.
Posted by SportTiger1
Stonewall, LA
Member since Feb 2007
29817 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:59 am to
listen, i've argued against at least 20 conspiracy theories on the rant in the past 10 years.

and i dont think that roger called up the refs and told them to make sure the Rams won.

BUT i DO believe that its possible that bias (either intentional or unintentional) couldve been baked into the crew's thought process.

basically, "if you get a chance to steer the game in this direction, that wouldnt be a bad thing"
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Maybe because the saints played cleaner?
Wait, if the refs are tasked with cheating, who cares if the Saints played cleaner?

Call a phantom hold or defensive PI here and there. But nah, you think it was better for the refs to wait, call the worst possible call imaginable, still only have a 20% chance to succeed in giving hte Rams the win, THEN have to rely on a kicker to make a 48 yard FG. That makes no sense whatsoever.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Dude, it’s 2018, I guarantee you the NFL can communicate with the refs the entire game and decide what they want to happen as the game plays out they don’t have to pre-determine what they want.

Dude, it's 2018. If that were happening, they would be outed pretty quickly.

quote:

It’s not like they have to come up with a preset plan and then shift the rest of the way to make sure they follow that plan, they adjust the cheating as they go bro, watch the fricking season and the games and then you’ll understand, going all the way back to the AFC championship last year you fricktard.

What if the Rams missed the FG at the end of regulation?
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Okay, so why did the NFL wait until the last drive to call in the fix? You understand how silly this sounds, right?

The NFL decided to really stick it to the Saints by decreasing their odds of winning the game to 78%!!!



Worst game fixing refs ever!!!
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 10:03 am to
quote:

You let things slide here and there. You don't just hammer them with penalties in the first quarter on every drive
Oh, so you wait until 1 team has no chance, then don't call the most obvious penalty that everyone will talk about, then the team still has a 78% chance to win, then you just hope that a FG or 2 is missed late. That's the logic?

quote:

Let me ask you this. You think games are ever fixed in pro sports?
Yes. It's done very in a very subtle way if so, not in the most obvious way possible.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112568 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Because it was the best one?
it was literally the worst way you can fix a game ever, and you call it the best one.

Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22788 posts
Posted on 1/22/19 at 10:04 am to
quote:

You let things slide here and there. You don't just hammer them with penalties in the first quarter on every drive


I'm not suggesting that you do this, all I'm suggesting is that if the refs were trying to make sure the Rams won, they went about doing that horribly. What if a DB slips and Brees throws a TD to Thomas on that same play? What if the Rams don't make a 57 yard FG to send the game to OT?

quote:

Let me ask you this. You think games are ever fixed in pro sports?



Sure they are, some sports more than others.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram