- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Drew Bree's shouldn't have to restructure his contract
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:33 pm
While it would probably help the team become more competitive, Drew Brees shouldn't have to restructure his deal. The saints agreed to the contract and were stupid enough to have his contract have a cap hit of 27 million. It's their problem, not his.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:34 pm to LSUfan97
It might help the team win?? That would be a good reason don't you think?
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:35 pm to LSUfan97
Restructures don't necessarily mean less money. The players actually get their money sooner when they convert base salary to a signing bonus. It's a frequently used move that benefits both sides.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:35 pm to Angioplasty
Restructuring wouldnt do much.
We'd need an extension for a $20 million rate, which is now a discount
We'd need an extension for a $20 million rate, which is now a discount
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:37 pm to LSUfan97
quote:
LSUfan97
Do the board a favor and quit posting
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:37 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
It's their problem, not his.
So its Loomis fault, I agree
Drew played it well and got the city behind his back and made it tough on Loomis not to pay him.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:39 pm to Angioplasty
Alright sure, that's a possibility, I addressed that. However, it's not like the saints didn't know about the humongous cap hit of Brees' contract. they agreed to it. There should never be any pressure on a player to take a pay cut to keep his team competitive. That is management's responbility. Why should he take a pay cut when the owners and management don't take a pay cut
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:40 pm to LSUfan97
quote:
There should never be any pressure on a player to take a pay cut to keep his team competitive. That is management's responbility. Why should he take a pay cut when the owners and management don't take a pay cut
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:41 pm to LSUfan97
Restructuring would make next year freaking laughable.
2015: 26.4mil
2016: 27.4mil
how about...
2015: 17.51mil
2016: 36.29mil
2015: 26.4mil
2016: 27.4mil
how about...
2015: 17.51mil
2016: 36.29mil
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:42 pm to LSUfan97
quote:
management don't take a pay cut
Sean did for Greg Williams the year we won the Super Bowl... just saying
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:42 pm to Smedium27
quote:
Drew played it well and got the city behind his back and made it tough on Loomis not to pay him.
Can't take any one seriously who said that Brees was a bad FA pickup.
He got the city and team behind him by playing like a 1st ballot Hall of Famer
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 10:43 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:44 pm to LSUfan97
This "Drew Brees needs to restructure" group thought is beyond idiotic.
1) he has stated he would restructure and the team has not thought it necessary
2) He accounts for 26 million of cap space. That leaves us with 119 million of space to build a team.
3) We have not been good at drafting and many of our big signings have been misses.
4) We are not in cap hell. We easily get under the cap every year and still are active in FA
5) Graham was not a salary cap trade. He was asset that still garnered a good return, but he is declining, often injured, and is reportedly a locker room titty-baby
1) he has stated he would restructure and the team has not thought it necessary
2) He accounts for 26 million of cap space. That leaves us with 119 million of space to build a team.
3) We have not been good at drafting and many of our big signings have been misses.
4) We are not in cap hell. We easily get under the cap every year and still are active in FA
5) Graham was not a salary cap trade. He was asset that still garnered a good return, but he is declining, often injured, and is reportedly a locker room titty-baby
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:45 pm to LSUfan97
I would not restructure him at this point. Let him play out his last 2 years and make him prove he is not "falling off." I think the Saints have a better gamble on this one since he is approaching 40.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:46 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
He got the city and team behind him by playing like a 1st ballot Hall of Famer
And the fact we had a top 5 defense and a top 5 run game has nothing to do with the success we had Pre- 100 million dollar Drew?
That's an honest question for everyone that will not be answered fully
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:48 pm to Smedium27
quote:
And the fact we had a top 5 defense and a top 5 run game has nothing to do with the success we had Pre- 100 million dollar Drew?
Holy shite, you're serious
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:48 pm to LSUfan97
I mean, his contract was backloaded and he is finally getting that money he deserves.
Extend him next year and make the most of the cap into a bonus.
Extend him next year and make the most of the cap into a bonus.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:50 pm to Lake Vegas Tiger
Alright, I admit that I made an error. I'm sorry, it was my fault. I now understand that restructuring doesn't mean a pay cut. However, it still doesn't cover up the negligence of Loomis. While my points on taking a pay cut were based of an error, what I said was logical if it were true. So do yourself a favor Lake Vegas Tiger, stop being so insecure about yourself that you have to insult people over the Internet to fulfill some form of pathetic self satisfaction and instead you should just discuss sports, the purpose of this site.
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:52 pm to Indfanfromcol
quote:
Holy shite, you're serious
Like I said, no one will ever give me a straight answer
Drew Bree's must have single handily won us that Super Bowl
quote:
stop being so insecure about yourself that you have to insult people over the Internet to fulfill some form of pathetic self satisfaction
Their is alot of this on here
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 3/10/15 at 10:55 pm to Smedium27
quote:
Drew Bree's must have single handily won us that Super Bowl
Nah, but his 70.6% completion, 4388 yards, 8.54 Y/A, 34 TDs-11INTs 109.6 passer rating got us to the playoffs...
Then his 70.6% completion, 732 yards, 7.18 Y/A, 8 TDs-0INTs 117 passer rating helped vastly for us.
Considering the fact that we couldn't run the ball vs. Indy very well (18 - 51 yards 2.8YPC), he pretty much did the damage.
This post was edited on 3/10/15 at 10:57 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News