- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:25 pm to lsufan_26
quote:
Definitely think QB play has a lot to do with this
Why? Did Cooks get more balls thrown to him?
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:26 pm to lsufan_26
They're different types of WRs
Snead is a better comp
Snead is a better comp
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:31 pm to lsufan_26
Cooks has been damn solid for a #20 pick....anyone who disagrees struggles with life and basic life functions.
...he was fire this year. Hasn't played two full seasons. He's the right type of player. Works hard. Wants it. Payton knew it. 1500 yards next season, 10 TDs.
We will laugh at these threads in the future, and Cooks will be there with Martin, Horn, and Colston as the greatest Saints receivers of all time.
...he was fire this year. Hasn't played two full seasons. He's the right type of player. Works hard. Wants it. Payton knew it. 1500 yards next season, 10 TDs.
We will laugh at these threads in the future, and Cooks will be there with Martin, Horn, and Colston as the greatest Saints receivers of all time.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:45 pm to drake20
I've never seen a player with his stats(and being a 2nd year player) get thoroughly criticised so much.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 8:40 pm to LosLobos111
Just off season trolltards ringin the cowbell for more post 

Posted on 1/21/16 at 10:41 pm to lsufan_26
quote:
quote: Cooks 26 games 1688 yds 12 tds
Landry 32 games 1915 yds 9 tds
hmmmm. give me Cooks.
Definitely think QB play has a lot to do with this
Landry - 278 targets
Cooks- 198 targets
When QB play is brought up, let us remember Josh Gordon going for 1600 yards and deandre Hopkins for 1500 with an assortment of shite throwing to them
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:21 pm to GynoSandberg
And tannehill isnt horrible
He's really good at the one thing Landry is good at(short/intermediate)
Some act like juice has the Texans QBs throwing to him
He's really good at the one thing Landry is good at(short/intermediate)
Some act like juice has the Texans QBs throwing to him
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:28 pm to drake20
Falling down/ running straight to the sidelines doesn't show me much "want".
Posted on 1/21/16 at 11:59 pm to Brandincookem
84 receptions, 1138 yards, 13.5 AVG, 9 TDs, 0FumL, 378 YAC, 45 1st downs; 53.6% of his receptions went for 1st downs, 33.2% of his yards are YAC, AVG air yards 9.05
110 receptions, 1157 yards, 10.5 AVG, 4 TDs, 0FumL, 537 YAC, 60 1st downs; 54.5% of his receptions went for 1st downs, 46.4% of his yards are YAC, AVG air yards 5.64
Know what that means? It is the same damn things people complain about Brady-Welker dink and dunk possession receiver.
2011: 122 receptions, 1569 yards, 12.9 AVG, 9 TDs, 732 YAC, 77 1st downs; 63.1% went for 1st downs, 46.7% are YAC, AVG air yards 6.89
2012: 118 receptions, 1354 yards, 11.5 AVG, 6 TDs, 702 YAC, 72 1st downs; 61.0% went for 1st downs, 51.8% are YAC, AVG air yards 5.53
110 receptions, 1157 yards, 10.5 AVG, 4 TDs, 0FumL, 537 YAC, 60 1st downs; 54.5% of his receptions went for 1st downs, 46.4% of his yards are YAC, AVG air yards 5.64
Know what that means? It is the same damn things people complain about Brady-Welker dink and dunk possession receiver.
2011: 122 receptions, 1569 yards, 12.9 AVG, 9 TDs, 732 YAC, 77 1st downs; 63.1% went for 1st downs, 46.7% are YAC, AVG air yards 6.89
2012: 118 receptions, 1354 yards, 11.5 AVG, 6 TDs, 702 YAC, 72 1st downs; 61.0% went for 1st downs, 51.8% are YAC, AVG air yards 5.53
Posted on 1/22/16 at 8:40 am to DatNolaClap
We could have Snead Cooks Landry and Parker. True story.
Posted on 1/22/16 at 9:30 am to Lester Earl
quote:
Bandin Crooks all day
Posted on 1/22/16 at 9:52 am to Lester Earl
quote:Drew Brees/Ryan Tannehill.
the guy that needs 84 catches to get 1100 yards or the guy that needs 110 fricking catches to get to 1100 yards Bandin Crooks all day
Tannehill's struggles with the deep ball are well documented.
I'm a huge pro-Cooks guy on this board, but Jarvis is better, by a decent margin IMO.
Posted on 1/22/16 at 9:57 am to Mouth
quote:Do you really need to ask why?
Why? Did Cooks get more balls thrown to him?
Brees is much, much better than Tannehill. Not sure why that had to be pointed out to you.
You think Ben Watson magically became better than Jimmy Graham this season?
Posted on 1/22/16 at 9:58 am to goatmilker
quote:Fair enough, but that can be spun any way you want.
TANNEHILL throws to Landry and whats his name. BREES throws to 9 different receivers a game
The other side of that is that it's much easier for a D to key on stopping Landry, and that defenses would not be able to kep on stopping Cooks since Brees can spread it out more.
Posted on 1/22/16 at 10:51 am to shel311
quote:
Do you really need to ask why?
Brees is much, much better than Tannehill. Not sure why that had to be pointed out to you.
You think Ben Watson magically became better than Jimmy Graham this season?
huh?
there was a lot of sarcasm in my post.
go read the whole thread. then you'll understand my argument.
Posted on 1/22/16 at 10:57 am to shel311
quote:
I'm a huge pro-Cooks guy on this board, but Jarvis is better, by a decent margin IMO.
what makes him better?
for someone that constantly argues in favor of efficiency, this isnt like you.
Posted on 1/22/16 at 11:07 am to shel311
quote:
Tannehill's struggles with the deep ball are well documented.
So why did Parker, Matthews, and Stills all average over 15 ypc?
Posted on 1/22/16 at 11:33 am to LooseCannon22282
quote:
The real comparison is Jarvis Landry vs. Stanley Jean Baptist
Yup
Posted on 1/22/16 at 12:39 pm to GynoSandberg
quote:
Landry is pro bowl alt w no heart or toughness!
No way you're serious about that quote?!?!?
Back to top


4






