- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 4/14/16 at 6:36 am to Nado Jenkins83
Maybe he means hemming and hawing.
Still doesn't make sense.
quote:
hemming and hawing
speaking hesitantly and inarticulately, with numerous pauses and interjections.
Still doesn't make sense.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 6:42 am to Nado Jenkins83
Hemming is when you put ur hands on somebody in a restraining position. Like shaking a female by the shoulders.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 6:44 am
Posted on 4/14/16 at 6:49 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
but Raquel Smith is lying?
Because RS put up with a woman beater.
Logical
Posted on 4/14/16 at 7:47 am to diat150
quote:
that is your opinion
Its not my opinion dude, look up the definition of self defense. You cant claim self defense if there is no immediate or imminent danger.
There is a difference between self defense, and stand your ground.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:19 am to lsufan31
Well i guess we certainly disagree on what immediate or imminent danger is.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:26 am to diat150
I mean if someone has their back to me and keeps reaching for the gun I will keep shooting.
That may have happened as well. I guess I would be burned at the stake for it but better than getting shot
That may have happened as well. I guess I would be burned at the stake for it but better than getting shot
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:33 am to diat150
quote:
immediate or imminent danger is.
There are legal definitions on those as well.....google it.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:35 am to Nado Jenkins83
like I said already, there is no law that says you cant shoot someone in the back in self defense. thats stupid.
its all about how believable you are and how the facts are laid out. similar to what happened in the case those guys posted earlier. the shooter lied about all kinds of shite and the jury dismissed his claims of self defense because he was clearly dishonest.
if smith threatened with a gun and made a move to obtain that gun and hayes story is consistent with evidence and witness testimony, then there is a good chance he will walk.
its all about how believable you are and how the facts are laid out. similar to what happened in the case those guys posted earlier. the shooter lied about all kinds of shite and the jury dismissed his claims of self defense because he was clearly dishonest.
if smith threatened with a gun and made a move to obtain that gun and hayes story is consistent with evidence and witness testimony, then there is a good chance he will walk.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:38 am to diat150
I hope the courts get this right in the end. But Saints fans look stupid to think Will Smith was some angel.
Same people loved Sharper and said "no way is this true"
I don't fall for idolizing athletes anymore. Too many of them are loose cannons ready to go off.
Same people loved Sharper and said "no way is this true"
I don't fall for idolizing athletes anymore. Too many of them are loose cannons ready to go off.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:51 am to lsufan31
quote:
There are legal definitions on those as well.....google it.
yes please find me louisiana law that spells out under what circumstances someone has to find them self in to be considered imminent danger.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:56 am to diat150
quote:
if smith threatened with a gun and made a move to obtain that gun and hayes story is consistent with evidence and witness testimony, then there is a good chance he will walk.
Yeah but there is one huge fact you are overlooking with this repetitive stance you keep pushing. If Hayes got out of his vehicle with his gun already on his person then Smith had every right to go for his gun being that SMITH would have been in imminent danger.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:59 am to BigBrod81
quote:
Yeah but there is one huge fact you are overlooking with this repetitive stance you keep pushing. If Hayes got out of his vehicle with his gun already on his person then Smith had every right to go for his gun being that SMITH would have been in imminent danger.
did smith know he had a gun? I have already said that if hayes got out brandishing his gun or pointing his gun at smith then he was done.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 8:59 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
But Saints fans look stupid to think Will Smith was some angel.
Where are all the people saying this? And don't tell me women on facebook. Show me people here saying it.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:01 am to LNCHBOX
its easily seen in the attacking of Hayes past.
When Smiths is worse
When Smiths is worse
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:03 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
its easily seen in the attacking of Hayes past.
So you're not going to give an actual example. OK.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:06 am to diat150
quote:
yes please find me
Do your own googling, I'm not here to provide you with anything other than my own experience/opinion. There are legal definitions of those words, and they are easily found with google, or any other simple search engine. You are more than welcome to keep arguing, but shooting someone in the back- is NOT now, nor has it ever been, a case for self defense.
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:08 am to lsufan31
quote:You are wrong. Sorry, but you are factually wrong in both theory and in practice. And not a single lawyer would agree with you
but shooting someone in the back- is NOT now, nor has it ever been, a case for self defense.
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 9:08 am
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:10 am to lsupride87
I mean you are so wrong, you come off as a fool.
So someone comes up to you with a gun, threatening to kill you. They drop there gun and turn around to pick it up, and POW, you finally had time to draw your gun and shoot them in the back.
Not self defense I guess for lsufan31
So someone comes up to you with a gun, threatening to kill you. They drop there gun and turn around to pick it up, and POW, you finally had time to draw your gun and shoot them in the back.
Not self defense I guess for lsufan31
This post was edited on 4/14/16 at 9:10 am
Posted on 4/14/16 at 9:10 am to diat150
quote:
did smith know he had a gun?
"frick you, I have a gun too." If that witness from the video heard that, I'm sure Smith did too. For Hayes to have the drop on Smith, he had to have had his gun on his person with both patries being out of their vehicles. This isn't rocket science dude.
Page 45 of 69
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News