- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are we done in FA?
Posted on 4/2/18 at 5:52 pm to bonethug0108
Posted on 4/2/18 at 5:52 pm to bonethug0108
I could be ok with that on third downs where Cam can be moved inside to the three tech but if we didn't need a game changer/upgrade why did we give all that money to Fairley? The Dts weren't good enough last year but they are this year, if we don't do something at DT we will continue not to get push and QBs will be able to just step up in the pocket
Posted on 4/2/18 at 6:18 pm to JGWSnextKamara
quote:
The Dts weren't good enough last year but they are this year, if we don't do something at DT we will continue not to get push and QBs will be able to just step up in the pocket
It's reasonable to expect our young DTs to improve. Rankins didn't have the sack numbers people were hoping, but he did a good job getting pressure and eating up some double teams. He was just a 2nd year player and missed half of his rookie year. Onyemata, who had very little experience entering the NFL, has definitely improved. Hendrickson looked comfortable inside as a rookie. Davison is kind of just a guy, but he's not a liability as a rotation player and he's cheap.
The team could definitely use a stud next to Rankins (with Onyemata being the main rotation player and Hendrickson playing more at DE), but I don't think that the position is in some dire need of an upgrade.
And Fairley got paid when Onyemata was still VERY raw and a question mark. Suh got interest because he's too good of a player to not go after.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 6:51 pm to JGWSnextKamara
Fairley was better than Hankins or Logan. He played the run well and could get consistent pressure.
Hankins and Logan can play the run well but aren't very good at getting consistent pressure. They'd be marginal upgrades over Davison (for way too much money) and may not be an upgrade over Onyemata (who improved greatly in year two).
Suh was a clear and huge upgrade, which is why we went after him. The other guys may not even start on our team, and you don't pay your third DT$5-6+ mil per year.
Sorry for all the people that thought and still think we were looking at DT. We weren't and aren't. We were looking at a true game changing player. That's all that was.
Hankins and Logan can play the run well but aren't very good at getting consistent pressure. They'd be marginal upgrades over Davison (for way too much money) and may not be an upgrade over Onyemata (who improved greatly in year two).
Suh was a clear and huge upgrade, which is why we went after him. The other guys may not even start on our team, and you don't pay your third DT$5-6+ mil per year.
Sorry for all the people that thought and still think we were looking at DT. We weren't and aren't. We were looking at a true game changing player. That's all that was.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 8:41 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
Davison is kind of just a guy, but he's not a liability as a rotation player and he's cheap.
at times he's been impressive stopping the run. Wish he could be more of force up the middle to collapse the pocket though.
I think Rankins was moved around some too. I mean he didn't always line up inside and I wondered if it had to do more with losing Okafor during the Redskins game?? Not sure about that but it did seem like he moved around some. I mean it's one thing to take an outside rusher and line him up on a guard to get a mismatch but its another to take an inside guy and ask him to beat a tackle.
one of the emphasis it seemed like the D-line had last year was to prepare to get its hands up to bat passes. I don't think it was a thing where the coaches thought our rush wouldn't be good enough but has more to do with the quick passing plays there are today.
and Cam Jordan was just great. His game against the Rams was probably his best game of the year. A close 2nd was the Lions game in my opinion.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 9:38 pm to TigahJay
Everyone thinks we are going to target a big time WR.. not sure if we actually will or not, but I find it interesting that the last person to lead the saints in receiving that was NOT drafted by the team was Lance Moore back in 2008..
I looked it up because I couldn’t remember a free agent WR having a huge impact since Joe Horn.. random fact of the day I guess
I looked it up because I couldn’t remember a free agent WR having a huge impact since Joe Horn.. random fact of the day I guess
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 9:40 pm
Posted on 4/2/18 at 9:44 pm to LooseCannon22282
quote:
I think Rankins was moved around some too. I mean he didn't always line up inside and I wondered if it had to do more with losing Okafor during the Redskins game??
Yeah, not only did he move outside, but they moved him to weakside DE. He moved around a lot in college, but Louisville ran a lot of 3-4 IIRC, so it wasn't the quite the same. He played a decent amount of 5-tech (outside of the LT's left shoulder) after Okafor went down, which wasn't ideal. I think he'd be fine playing 5-tech on the strongside (mostly what Cam plays), but LT's are clearly a different animal and much more capable of pass blocking.
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:23 pm to LooseCannon22282
Fwiw Davison was our highest ranked interior lineman in 2017 per PFF
Davison - 81
Onyekata - 80.9
Rankins - 80.7
Davison - 81
Onyekata - 80.9
Rankins - 80.7
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:27 pm to GynoSandberg
I like our DT rotation and the plus side is that Davison is heading into a contract year and the other 2 are entering year 3.
No reason not to expect a step forward from the trio. Also flirting with Suh could also be a motivating factor to all of them.
No reason not to expect a step forward from the trio. Also flirting with Suh could also be a motivating factor to all of them.
This post was edited on 4/2/18 at 10:30 pm
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:37 pm to GynoSandberg
All about what and what according to pff. 0.3 separation between the "best" of those 3 and the "worst".
Onyemata really started coming on more and more near the end of the season though, and it showed as he stole more and more snaps from Davison. He provides a better pass rush and doesn't lose too much for you in run defense.
Onyemata really started coming on more and more near the end of the season though, and it showed as he stole more and more snaps from Davison. He provides a better pass rush and doesn't lose too much for you in run defense.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 10:44 pm to GynoSandberg
oh yeah.. I've seen him hold his ground exceptionally well against the run. He can anchor real well.
I'll admit that on pass plays I don't notice as much. The ball usually is thrown a lot quicker these days either by design or cause of the cushion that the DB's give sometimes.
maybe it's both. It's a high tempo game still for the most part. I guess
I'll admit that on pass plays I don't notice as much. The ball usually is thrown a lot quicker these days either by design or cause of the cushion that the DB's give sometimes.
maybe it's both. It's a high tempo game still for the most part. I guess
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:05 pm to LooseCannon22282
quote:I didn't find he held ground or created push often enough. He was somewhat inconsistent.
oh yeah.. I've seen him hold his ground exceptionally well against the run. He can anchor real well.
Posted on 4/2/18 at 11:20 pm to NOSHAU
quote:
I didn't find he held ground or created push often enough. He was somewhat inconsistent.
yet analytic scores say otherwise. At least compared to the interior linemen last year. You really gonna contend with PFF stats and the word of fellow Saints posters? It's cool if you do. For real. I'm so salty how our season ended last year I'm bound to say anything.
i guess we could always cut him though.
Nothing surprises me anymore.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 1:15 am to GynoSandberg
Shows you how good Davison is against the run with that score, b/c his pass rushing score had to be pretty bad. He's a very good run stuffer. It's nice to have Onyemata replacing him on obvious passing downs. If Onyemata keeps getting better against the run, he might replace Davison completely.
Davison has been our best run stuffing DT for the last 2 years (better than Fairley & Rankins). He should be pretty cheap if we want to re-sign him after the 2018 season as well. Something like 2-3 mil a year (he's making 1.961 mil this year).
I think Davison has pretty much reached his ceiling as a really good run stuffer though. I don't think Rankins or Onyemata have reached their ceiling yet, so I'm really not sure what to expect this year.
I'm starting to agree with bonethug about Hankins & Logan. There's really no point in signing either of them, b/c we already have Davison. If they are better than Davison at stopping the run...it's not by much at all & they cost a lot more. It's nice to have 3 solid options & we should be fine at the DT position if all 3 of them can stay healthy like last year.
If we don't draft a DT...I'm assuming Loewen will be our #4 DT this year. He can actually provide a decent pass rush from the interior. He can play DE (probably to stop the run) if needed, & plays special teams as well. Based on what I saw last year...he's kind of similar to Trey Hendrickson (both of them are DT/DE tweeners).
Davison has been our best run stuffing DT for the last 2 years (better than Fairley & Rankins). He should be pretty cheap if we want to re-sign him after the 2018 season as well. Something like 2-3 mil a year (he's making 1.961 mil this year).
I think Davison has pretty much reached his ceiling as a really good run stuffer though. I don't think Rankins or Onyemata have reached their ceiling yet, so I'm really not sure what to expect this year.
I'm starting to agree with bonethug about Hankins & Logan. There's really no point in signing either of them, b/c we already have Davison. If they are better than Davison at stopping the run...it's not by much at all & they cost a lot more. It's nice to have 3 solid options & we should be fine at the DT position if all 3 of them can stay healthy like last year.
If we don't draft a DT...I'm assuming Loewen will be our #4 DT this year. He can actually provide a decent pass rush from the interior. He can play DE (probably to stop the run) if needed, & plays special teams as well. Based on what I saw last year...he's kind of similar to Trey Hendrickson (both of them are DT/DE tweeners).
This post was edited on 4/3/18 at 2:09 am
Posted on 4/3/18 at 2:17 am to unctiger4
quote:
TommyLee is a perfectly capable 4th or 5th guy imo. Is he still under contract?
Yes he's under contract. I haven't really seen anything from Tommylee to think he's a capable #4 WR. He's basically good for a big play every now & then...he also has average hands at best. I'm assuming that Tommylee & Carr will be battling it out for our #5 WR in the pre-season.
Thomas is our #1
Ginn is our #2
I think Tommylee or Carr will be our #5 this year
That just leaves #3 & #4. I'm assuming that we either sign 2 free agents before the draft, or sign 1 free agent if we plan on drafting a WR.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 10:12 am to TigahJay
Any more good O lineman floating around in FA?
Posted on 4/3/18 at 10:26 am to jkylejohnson
There are some decent options for a backup OT, but I'm not sure any of them would be better than Bushrod.
There are a couple decent options at OG, but you can get a better & cheaper player in the draft.
I assume that we're done signing O-Lineman in free agency (maybe LeRibeus at the most). We're probably going to rely on the draft for our backup O-Line issues.
There are a couple decent options at OG, but you can get a better & cheaper player in the draft.
I assume that we're done signing O-Lineman in free agency (maybe LeRibeus at the most). We're probably going to rely on the draft for our backup O-Line issues.
This post was edited on 4/3/18 at 10:41 am
Posted on 4/3/18 at 10:43 am to GMoney2600
Awesome. I can't wait for the draft.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 12:23 pm to GMoney2600
quote:
I assume that we're done signing O-Lineman in free agency
They'll try to get another vet in after losing Strief and Kelemete
Posted on 4/3/18 at 12:50 pm to mm2316
We keep anywhere from 8-10 O-Lineman. Usually 8 or 9.
As of right now...we have Armstead, Unger, Warford, Peat, Ramczyk, Bushrod (I'm assuming he can still play RT if needed...Peat is our backup LT), & Tom as guys that are likely to make the roster. 7 guys total.
I think LeRibeus could be an option eventually, but I'm not really sure at this point. Combine that with a likely OG/OC in the draft & I think we're done here. I've been wrong much more than I'd like to be, so take this for what it's worth.
As of right now...we have Armstead, Unger, Warford, Peat, Ramczyk, Bushrod (I'm assuming he can still play RT if needed...Peat is our backup LT), & Tom as guys that are likely to make the roster. 7 guys total.
I think LeRibeus could be an option eventually, but I'm not really sure at this point. Combine that with a likely OG/OC in the draft & I think we're done here. I've been wrong much more than I'd like to be, so take this for what it's worth.
Posted on 4/3/18 at 1:38 pm to GMoney2600
quote:
Tom
It would be huge if he could lock down the backup C/G position. There will be another vet OT in for a visit soon.
Popular
Back to top


2






