Started By
Message

re: Anyone else surprised at Payton's play calling?

Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:05 pm to
Posted by LasVegasBandit
Member since Sep 2013
1881 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:05 pm to
We were shredding Chicago and New England. People acting like we average 2 yards per damn carry or something.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:19 pm to
A dad doesn't trust his son, so he doesn't give him opportunities to prove he's trustworthy.
The son argues that he can be trusted, but he has no evidence to prove it because the father won't budge.

We can't have a competent run game if we don't run, regardless of whether it is good or bad.
Posted by Brettesaurus Rex
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2009
38259 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

A dad doesn't trust his son, so he doesn't give him opportunities to prove he's trustworthy. The son argues that he can be trusted, but he has no evidence to prove it because the father won't budge. We can't have a competent run game if we don't run, regardless of whether it is good or bad.

Couldn't have said it better myself. Bravo good sir
Posted by LasVegasBandit
Member since Sep 2013
1881 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:29 pm to
Yah agreed good analogy
Posted by hellsu
Northshore via Westbank
Member since Jan 2009
3951 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:31 pm to
We don't have to run 40 times a game , but you have to keep the defense honest or they will take advantage of your one dimensional offense. You can't establish a running game with no running plays.
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

We can't have a competent run game if we don't run, regardless of whether it is good or bad.


we have run 178 times for 597 yards as a team. that's 3.4 per rush and 22.4 times per game.

We've shown flashes of competence here and there lately, it has largely been ineffective.
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64457 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

A dad doesn't trust his son, so he doesn't give him opportunities to prove he's trustworthy. The son argues that he can be trusted, but he has no evidence to prove it because the father won't budge. We can't have a competent run game if we don't run, regardless of whether it is good or bad.


Payton datty lock. I don't give a shite if someone on here invents a new offensive scheme and the saints themselves implementation it. You just put it on ice.
Posted by speckhead
Member since Nov 2011
1111 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 10:14 pm to
Surprised by Payton's play calling, how about using the word terrible. He lost the Patriot game with play calling, he didn't do any better today. He deserves respect for his coaching through the years, but with the lack of talent at WR and no running game it's time for SP to review his huge play book and make better calls according to talent.
Posted by pellietigersaint
Tiger Stadium
Member since Aug 2005
19043 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

What are you scared of Payton? fricking man up and get the first and quit pussyfooting around




This x1000
Posted by LooseCannon22282
Mobile
Member since May 2008
33771 posts
Posted on 11/3/13 at 11:20 pm to
I was down right fricking shocked at the reverse towards the end of the game.

on the replay, yeah, it did look like he would have had the corner turned but Coples the Jets DE wasn't having anything of it, he stayed at home and that was that.

of course that play didn't cost us the game though. You can never really pin it on just one play IMO. I know that this thread isn't all about that one play but I'm sure a lot of people have made it out to be or will blame it on that play.
This post was edited on 11/3/13 at 11:22 pm
Posted by JacksonLSU
california
Member since Oct 2007
1664 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 5:22 am to
quote:

i dont agree with the call, but if the backside DE crashes in on the RB, he has a lot of room to run it's basically a bootleg play. All the blocking action is dedicated to the fake. The TE is on his own with hopefully no one looking at him. That's the design


yea..pretty obvious to see he had a open lane to run if he was free... and 3rd string means no way we do that,,,,.....but still---over thinking sean
Posted by eyeran
New Orleans
Member since Dec 2007
22096 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 8:27 am to
quote:

I've been holding back my thoughts about the play calling.

But it's...awful at times.

I don't know what CSP is seeing anymore.
Same way i've felt. Hard to come here and bitch about playcalling when the team is winning though. The offense was better during last year's disaster. We scored more ppg last year and averaged 20ypg more rushing. Thats with us consistently having to try and throw our way back into games last year.

Whats become almost laughable is that we go with Brees' nonchalant playaction fake on almost every single non-shotgun pass play. Laughable because we dont/can't run the ball. Laughable because it never looks like an actual handoff. And laughable because its no longer a playaction fake if you do it on every snap. Its basically just part of Brees' drop back motion now.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Same way i've felt. Hard to come here and bitch about playcalling when the team is winning though. The offense was better during last year's disaster. We scored more ppg last year and averaged 20ypg more rushing. Thats with us consistently having to try and throw our way back into games last year.


We also had more turnovers and were near the bottom of the league in time of possession. This year is a different story.

quote:

Whats become almost laughable is that we go with Brees' nonchalant playaction fake on almost every single non-shotgun pass play. Laughable because we dont/can't run the ball. Laughable because it never looks like an actual handoff. And laughable because its no longer a playaction fake if you do it on every snap. Its basically just part of Brees' drop back motion now.


Actually the playaction was working well in the first half, we had several long developing plays that we connected on because of that playaction and Toon dropped another one. The pass rush started killing us after the turnovers and we were more or less forced to start throwing the ball from the shotgun.

Even if your not running the ball well, the playaction still has an effect on the defense and that was evident in the first half.


I didn't have a problem with the playcalling. Turnovers and drops hurt us in the first half. once we started playing from behind the Jets were able to sit back with 2 deep safeties and push the pocket in the middle of the line. Our game plan was playaction passes over the top and it was working in the first half outside of the drops.

I can see complaints about the tight end around, it was a gimmick play but Collins basically picked up that 1st down twice. Not to mention we have never been good on short yardage running plays.
This post was edited on 11/4/13 at 8:54 am
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 8:52 am to
quote:

yea..pretty obvious to see he had a open lane to run if he was free... and 3rd string means no way we do that


I don't see the problem with Hill being the guy on the reverse. It really didn't matter who was running that, it was all about what Coples does. If he crashes, it's a first. Plus it's not like Hill is some slow footed TE, he ran a 4.66 at his pro day.

Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40930 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:04 am to
quote:

I've been holding back my thoughts about the play calling.

But it's...awful at times.


in general, his coaching has been terrible this year. his timeout calling has been suspect, especially earlier in the season, and his 3rd and 4th down play calling has been pretty awful.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:07 am to
quote:

and his 3rd and 4th down play calling has been pretty awful.




We're top ten in the league on third down conversion percentage.
Posted by quail man
New York, NY
Member since May 2010
40930 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:11 am to
more 4th than 3rd down, but there have still been a number of times where it was pretty awful on 3rd.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166751 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:12 am to
quote:

more 4th than 3rd down, but there have still been a number of times where it was pretty awful on 3rd.


it was awful cause it didn't work amirite? its good cause it works amirite? payton made a hell of a call on that hartley fg for 55 cause it went through amirite? Payton says lick his nuts.
Posted by EarthwormJim
Member since Dec 2005
10063 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:17 am to
quote:

more 4th than 3rd down, but there have still been a number of times where it was pretty awful on 3rd.


I mean, yeah, we aren't good on 4th down because we're not a good power running team, hence the reason we try things like end arounds on 4th and short.

I'm not sure I recall any 3rd down plays where I was thinking "WTF was that" because most of the time we put the ball in Drew's hands, and that has been pretty effective.

The issue here is we aren't good at short yardage. The reason Ingram/Thomas get stuffed behind the line so many times on 3rd/4th and short isn't just because Ingram is pretty bad, it's also because guys are always in our backfield on those plays.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28581 posts
Posted on 11/4/13 at 9:30 am to
Is it all SP, or is Brees checking out of a lot of the running plays that are called?

Also, what more does Pierre Thomas have to do to show that he can be trusted? Since 2011 SP has tried to force Ingram as the 3rd and short back. The guy can't pick up 2 yards on 1st and 10, what makes you think he can convert 3rd and 1 when the entire DL is stacked to stop him? While he will never be an Adrian Peterson type back, PT rarely ever gets stopped for negative yardage. He's got excellent vision and a knack for contorting his body just enough to fall forward for a positive gain. Yesterday the Saints faced 3rd and literally 1 inch. PT was nowhere to be found. He's never on the field on 3rd and short, and it's mindboggling! Maybe I'm a bigger PT fan than most, but I think if the Saints gave him 14-18 carries a game, he would gain 70+ yards. For this offense, that should be plenty to keep teams honest.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram