Started By
Message

re: Why Dyson Daniels?

Posted on 6/23/22 at 10:39 pm to
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
95699 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 10:39 pm to
Don't lets be negative, mate - I'm tremendously happy with the addition of young DD to our Pellies' Pod

This post was edited on 6/23/22 at 10:42 pm
Posted by TigerBait2008
Boulder,CO
Member since Jun 2008
35624 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:50 pm to
Dumbass
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
13087 posts
Posted on 6/23/22 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

what

Jose is a bench energy player bro
Yeah, but once Dyson is acclimated, he will start eating into those late game minutes that Jose took because of his defense. Dyson's size may be more of a need.
Posted by duyp
Member since May 2011
3037 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 3:15 am to
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
19967 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:02 am to
LINK

This is a really extensive, in-depth breakdown from someone who had Daniels as the #3 guy in the draft. It's well worth reading/watching.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:19 am to
Some people may not realize it but the ignite sucked last year outside of the young guys.

quote:

After the Showcase Cup, G League Ignite began their “Ignite Tour.” The tour was exclusively on the road, including two months in some of the coldest cities in the United States. For anybody, this can be a rough context to perform in, which adds to the problematic context of Team Ignite. The Ignite Tour games had little meaning behind them other than to showcase Ignite prospects, as the opposing team’s record was not affected by these games.

So, with a rather challenging scheduling situation, a lack of meaning to games, and essentially having every game be a road game, it is safe to say the context of Ignite this last season put the prospects in a very tough situation.

The goal of Ignite is to be a prep-for-pro program for prospects and a pro-to-player development pipeline for veterans. Analyzing the team makeup of Ignite, the roster struggled to cover some essential needs for team building. The prospects this last year varied in performance, with Scoot Henderson showing potential #1 flashes for the 2023 draft and MarJon Beauchamp solidifying himself as a first-round pick.

On the other hand, Jaden Hardy fell from his top 5 status, while big men Michael Foster and Fanbo Zeng just hope to hear their names called on June 23rd. However, the veterans around the prospects are, in my opinion, what set the prospects back.

Amir Johnson had the longest and most successful NBA career of the veterans who contributed throughout the season. The only other player on the roster with NBA experience (albeit one year) was Pooh Jeter, who, despite being the best shooter on the roster and a great veteran to have on the team, is 38 years old and 5’10” if he stretches in the morning. Dakarai Allen has been a career G League role player. If you look up Kevin Murphy on Google, the first thing that pops up is a soap company.

The veterans for this team lacked the skill to assist and bail out the prospects when needed. With a struggling squad that lacked shooting (31.5% from 3 as a team), spacing (least attempts from 3 in the league), rim protection, and good screen setters, it was hard for team Ignite to generate any offense.

The lack of foundational team building forced Dyson back into the point guard role he had with the Australia team, for better or worse. Still, despite the poor offensive context of Team Ignite, Daniels was able to showcase his playmaking potential.




On one stretch he averaged 5.8 assists VS only 2 TOs a game as he got more comfortable

33/6 AST/TO in transition
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
43429 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:50 am to
great find
Posted by STEVED00
Member since May 2007
22829 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 8:57 am to
From the article

quote:

At the time, Dyson was a 6’4? shooting guard, known for his willingness to move the ball, incredible work rate on both ends of the floor, and ability to impact his teammates positively. However, he was not seen as one of the top prospects in the area, often struggling offensively against higher-level talents. What kept Dyson on the court at the time was his defensive ability and creating leverage on the offensive end.


They conveniently left out that he grew 4”. That seems important Did we just find another Scottie Pippen.
This post was edited on 6/24/22 at 8:59 am
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
15586 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:08 am to
Page 8 is a fantastic summary and makes a great case for Dyson being a Top 3 selection.

I did not know he grew from 6-6 (beginning of the season) to 6-8 (by the end of the season).

Posted by Billy Mays
Member since Jan 2009
25504 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Page 8 is a fantastic summary and makes a great case for Dyson being a Top 3 selection.

I did not know he grew from 6-6 (beginning of the season) to 6-8 (by the end of the season).


If that doesn't get you hyped for the pick, nothing will
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
19967 posts
Posted on 6/24/22 at 9:26 am to
Yeah, it really convinced me that Dyson has a top-3 ceiling in the class. He definitely has a lower floor than Jabari Smith, for example, but a higher ceiling.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 6Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram