Started By
Message

re: The national media still thinks AD to Lakers.. I just dont get it

Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:24 am to
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11894 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:24 am to
quote:

The Lakers package was good, really good. It was a Godfather level good. We won't get a better offer.
You cannot honestly believe that and convince anyone you actually follow the NBA. It was not even close to Godfather good. If that is the best deal that the Pelicans get offered, is there any reason to think it will not be available this summer?
This post was edited on 2/28/19 at 9:28 am
Posted by brmark70816
Atlanta, GA
Member since Feb 2011
9778 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:24 am to
quote:

Riddle me this, if Davis played for them the second half of the season, do you really think that they would end up with a better pick than Boston or the Grizzlies?


Well I just promised someone that I wouldn't do anything crazy or say anything too outlandish. So, I'll just say, I don't know..
Posted by BetOnIt
Member since Feb 2019
183 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:29 am to
It seems like the thing this guy is not factoring in is their next contract.

I mean, Kuzma and Ingram are okay. And on the contracts they have now, they are fine. But imagine having to give them 4/80 or even more. Now, all of a sudden they are negative assets. Or, you have to let them go.

So, you are trading AD for guys who will either soon be negative assets or be gone. Maybe if he understood that, he would understand why most Pelicans fans would hate the deal.
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11894 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:35 am to
quote:

It seems like the thing this guy is not factoring in is their next contract.

I mean, Kuzma and Ingram are okay. And on the contracts they have now, they are fine. But imagine having to give them 4/80 or even more. Now, all of a sudden they are negative assets. Or, you have to let them go.

So, you are trading AD for guys who will either soon be negative assets or be gone. Maybe if he understood that, he would understand why most Pelicans fans would hate the deal.


Exactly, and Ingram sooner than later. Does Ingram then become our next Gordon situation where management feels that we have to overpay to keep him simply because he is the main asset of the AD trade. (He even has the Gordon look at times )
This post was edited on 2/28/19 at 9:37 am
Posted by BetOnIt
Member since Feb 2019
183 posts
Posted on 2/28/19 at 9:39 am to
Yeah. It seems like one of this guys main arguments is that two pretty good guys is better than having one really good guy (Tatum). Which I disagree with, but whatever.

But if we put contracts in the mix and say: Would you rather have Tatum on a 4 year/100 million dollar deal or Ingram and Kuzma, both on 4/80?

I'd rather have Tatum and $15 mil in cap room, personally. Once you start talking about next contracts, you see why the Lakers deal is trash. Either you overpay the guys or you lose them. Both are bad.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 7Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram