- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:13 pm to Aced
quote:
Either it's no cap space with Parsons or no cap space without Parsons. I know which one I would take
Definitely. The Ariza signing doesn't make a ton of sense to me (although they did get good value), but it would make less sense if they didn't match Parsons. Ariza is a great asset on the deal he's signed to, I could see them moving Ariza next season or so.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:19 pm to Aced
I'm not sure why they would bring Parsons back now
Let Dallas pay him 15 mil a year
You just got close to the same player in Ariza for 7 mil less a year
Let Dallas pay him 15 mil a year
You just got close to the same player in Ariza for 7 mil less a year
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:25 pm to danman6336
Because it costs the team nothing, only the owner
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:27 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:i'm still a novice when it comes to all these rules and exceptions. I know they can go over the cap to re-sign parsons because they have his bird rights but does doing that have any cap implications in future years?
Because it costs the team nothing, only the owner
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:37 pm to LosLobos111
Why not though?
He was under 7 million last season and may go for cheaper than that since he didn't play much for the pacers. Decent size and defense, averages close to 15 a game, and fits a position of need.
He was under 7 million last season and may go for cheaper than that since he didn't play much for the pacers. Decent size and defense, averages close to 15 a game, and fits a position of need.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:40 pm to DJ3K
Marvin Williams to the Hornets, 2 years 14M.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:43 pm to AirFarce1
Good for the hornets
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:47 pm to DJ3K
quote:
Decent size and defense, averages close to 15 a game, and fits a position of need.
His defense is below average
One of the most inefficient scorers in the league and has a bad jumper.
Hasn't really improved in 5 years
Last thing we need is an SF that can't hit 3s.
He also doesn't fit with Jrue or Reke.
This post was edited on 7/12/14 at 6:52 pm
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:51 pm to Fearthehat0307
So this season they can go over the cap to sign Parsons. Next season they'll have Howard for 22.3m, Harden for 15.7m Parsons for 15.3m, Ariza for 8.2m, and a team option for Terrence Jones at 2.5m. That's 64m right there, so without trades it would be hard for them to really improve their team next off season.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:52 pm to Epic Cajun
They'll have 2 $8.4 million trade exceptions from Lin and Asik.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:55 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
Anthony Morrow @MrAnthonyMorrow about 27 minutes ago
Im blessed, I want to thank the New Orleans Pelicans organization, the city of New Orleans and all the fans for the opportunity and support
Posted on 7/12/14 at 6:58 pm to LosLobos111
Kevin Love Alert:
quote:
@MikeCairns5: Cavs working three team deal w/ Warriors/TWolves. Warriors get multiple 1st rnd picks. Wolves get Klay and Tristan Thompson. Love to Cavs
Mike Cairns @MikeCairns5
I am told Flip Saunders Holding it up
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:02 pm to LosLobos111
Why in the hell would Golden State do that?
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:02 pm to LosLobos111
Is that enough salary out for the Cavs? 6ish million for Thompson's contract and 16ish coming back in?
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:03 pm to Jwho77
Agreed. I can it see if Cleveland sent Waiters and picks to GS. Not just picks though.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:03 pm to Spitting Venom
Does the new Gee trade exception fill the gap?
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:05 pm to LosLobos111
So GS wouldn't do Thompson for Love but they'll do Thompson for picks? I assumed they would be a win now mode.
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:07 pm to Jwho77
I don't know. I usually keep up with the numbers. I haven't had a computer for two months though, so I haven't been able to do much research. Kind of aggravating 
Posted on 7/12/14 at 7:07 pm to Aced
Only reason I can see GSW making that deal is surrender. They are conceding that they cannot compete for a title any time soon, so they are acquiring assets. But still...
Page 108 of 137
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News