Started By
Message

Jonathan Givony w/ Draft Express | Pels and Hawks Discussing Swapping #4 for #8 & #10

Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:05 pm
Posted by msutiger
Shreveport
Member since Jul 2008
69606 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:05 pm
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/5/23 at 2:11 pm
Posted by ColeLSU
Member since Jul 2008
5856 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:06 pm to
No thanks
Posted by ulsaint
Member since Oct 2007
2460 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:06 pm to
Would these then be used in another trade? I just don't see us rolling out three lottery pick rooks.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52603 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:06 pm to
Don’t really see why we’d do this. Unless we really want a Jackson Hayes, cam reddish type player. Hard pass from me
Posted by Dogstar
Member since Jun 2019
372 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:07 pm to
8 & 10 & 17 and we’ll consider it maybe. Garland is not coming to any team cheaply tho. He would be the perfect P&R partner for Zion for the next 10+ years!
Posted by J_Hingle
LA
Member since Jun 2013
5106 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:07 pm to
I'm guessing a player would be involved. if not then i dont see it
Posted by MrJimBeam
Member since Apr 2009
12296 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:07 pm to
Throw in Alex Len and a future 1st
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10382 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:08 pm to
Only reason I can see it if Washington wants the picks. But that’s a long shot either way.
Posted by JGuidry7
Boston University
Member since Jan 2013
932 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Would these then be used in another trade?

only way it makes sense to me if it would be for that purpose (Myles Turner :fingers crossed:). But the 1.4 carries so much more value to our needs as of now obviously
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95311 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:09 pm to
I would think this would be part of a chain of deals to get future draft picks or players. Because I don’t see having three rookies this season as a great plan unless one is a draft and stash.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52603 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:11 pm to
Washington would probably just prefer the 4th over those 2 picks
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34897 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Would these then be used in another trade? I just don't see us rolling out three lottery pick rooks.




That was my first thought

But now I’m thinking - who would be more excited about 8 and 10 than they would be about 4?

Posted by Tellem
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2009
955 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:12 pm to
Would love to somehow (without reaching) get bucket getterTyler Herro coming off of our bench along with Hart, Okafor and Wood
Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20685 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

who would be more excited about 8 and 10 than they would be about 4?


Maybe if Washington wants players on cheap contracts for the remainder of the Wall deal?

I agree with you though. Not sure why someone would prefer 8 & 10 over 4.
Posted by tke_swamprat
Houma, LA
Member since Aug 2004
9759 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:17 pm to
Pels could get White and Hayes with 8 & 10.
Posted by Mystictiger
Texas
Member since Jul 2015
2624 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:18 pm to
White will more than likely be taken by Phoenix or Chicago if they don’t trade those picks.
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14764 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:20 pm to
Great move, if we are not trading it for one established vet like Beal or Turner.

But the fact remains we need 3pt shooting role players for much needed floor spacing and we also need a shot-blocker/rim protector.

Bol Bol fits both categories as a superior shooter & shotblocker. With the other pick, adding another lights out 3pt shooter like Cameron Johnson fits perfectly as well.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
17826 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:21 pm to
Well, the #4 pick is going to be a guard, and we really have enough guards for now. And we still needs bigs. I mean, I'm not opposed to using the #4 pick on Garland (I'm not the fan of Culver that some of you are), but if we can get Hayes and flip the other pick for a good player, then that sounds good to me.
Posted by Macintosh504
Leveraging Salaries University
Member since Sep 2011
52603 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:25 pm to
quote:

Well, the #4 pick is going to be a guard, and we really have enough guards for now.



Do we tho? It’s just Ball and Jrue. Payton isn’t staying and Frank Jackson, tho I like the guy, is easily replaceable
Posted by PrayingMantis
Member since Jul 2013
1143 posts
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:25 pm to
I don’t get the hate for a deal like this. We can get Reddish and Bol and Cam Johnson at 17 or instead of 17 get next years nets pick
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram