- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Jonathan Givony w/ Draft Express | Pels and Hawks Discussing Swapping #4 for #8 & #10
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:48 pm to supe12sta12z
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:48 pm to supe12sta12z
If I trade 4, I want future picks or good players now. I kind of want Garland now.
0
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:49 pm to DJ3K
quote:
Let's say they make the trade. Is 8, 10, Moore and Hill enough for Beal
frick no. If Lonzo/Ingram and the 4 is barely enough for him at best, that garbage is def not
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:50 pm to Jon1798
quote:Reports are they are trying to get Hunter.
Hawks want Reddish from all reports.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:56 pm to NOSHAU
If we move from 4 to 8 we are going to potentially be looking at another 2012 situation where Damian Lilliard gets taken at 6 and we end up with Austin fricking Rivers at 10.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 12:56 pm to NOSHAU
Hunter makes more sense based on how their roster is constructed. He’s a perfect match for the Hawks.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:31 pm to msutiger
Unless we package that for another rookie I'll pass. We have enough young players atm. If anything a first rounder next year so we can evaluate what we have in Lonzo for a year
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:35 pm to msutiger
Whoever the Pelicans draft at #4 will probably end up having more value down the road than the #8 and #10 players in this draft.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:36 pm to Unknown_Poster
quote:
Whoever the Pelicans draft at #4 will probably end up having more value down the road than the #8 and #10 players in this draft.
Some people feel it's a wash from 4 down to maybe 15 or 20. If you really feel that way, why not go for the two-fer?
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:42 pm to tke_swamprat
I laughed when I saw that Atlanta expected NY to trade for this package. I then scrolled to the bottom of the article and saw NO is considering it and my smiled went away.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:42 pm to sicboy
It's intriguing but I really don't want 3 top 10 picks in this mediocre draft
Now of they move 10 to a team in the later teens and nab a player+2020 pick then I could see it
Now of they move 10 to a team in the later teens and nab a player+2020 pick then I could see it
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:43 pm to sicboy
quote:
Some people feel it's a wash from 4 down to maybe 15 or 20. If you really feel that way, why not go for the two-fer?
I see the logic, it's just not an opinion I share. I think there's a group of three or four players after the top three that are markedly better than whoever you could get from eight on down.
And although not always true, it's typically true from a historical perspective of the draft. Very few strong players come from outside of the top positions. My larger point is that even if you don't end up keeping the player you draft at #4, chances are you can get more value by trading him at a later date than you can for trading #8 and #10.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:43 pm to sicboy
If you can get a combo like Reddish and Haynes, you might just go for it
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:46 pm to LosLobos111
I'd rather just stay at 4 and take Culver or Garland and hold onto them. Hope that they do really good and by mid season or a season from now, decide if they are worth keeping or trading.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:48 pm to Crazed2APoint
quote:
I'd rather just stay at 4 and take Culver or Garland and hold onto them. Hope that they do really good and by mid season or a season from now, decide if they are worth keeping or trading.
Right. You don't have to look any further than the AD trade to realize teams can use picks like Tatum, Ingram, Ball, Brown, etc. to act as valuable assets in bigger deals depending on who becomes available later.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:49 pm to Unknown_Poster
Trade for picks 8 and 17 along with swap rights over the next two years.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:58 pm to LosLobos111
I’m thinking 4 to 8 plus Atlanta’s 2020 pick (top 4 protected), give or take a player like Alex Len.
My big deal is that I don’t want too many picks in this draft and I’m not giving into the Garland hype at the moment.
My big deal is that I don’t want too many picks in this draft and I’m not giving into the Garland hype at the moment.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 1:59 pm to sicboy
quote:
Some people feel it's a wash from 4 down to maybe 15 or 20. If you really feel that way, why not go for the two-fer?
I would heavily disagree with that. The top 3 are in their own tier (or maybe two tiers with Zion on his own), but I would say 4-7 or maybe 4-8 are quite separated from the rest of the 1st round.
The prospects drop off pretty drastically late in the top 10.
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:04 pm to CP3forMVP
I might do a 4 for 8 and 10 if they take Solo and give us Nets 2020 1st round pick. That frees up our cap space for Free Agency.
This post was edited on 6/18/19 at 2:05 pm
Posted on 6/18/19 at 2:05 pm to Mad Scientist26
4 for 8 and 10 sure as hell doesn't get me anywhere. We'd be giving up a Trae Young talent at 4 that we sure as hell can't get at 8 in this draft.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News