Started By
Message

re: Does Griffin have something up his sleeve that is bigger than we expect?

Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:23 pm to
He's going to ask AD if he likes apples.


Slams Jared Dudley's picture on the table.



Then continues to ask him "how about deez apples?"


*mic drop*
Posted by NolaJake
Member since Jul 2017
123 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:24 pm to
I think Griffin is more focused on building the foundations that he wants for the organization over looking to strike a big deal right now. There are more front office hires/shuffling coming. Gotta get that part done and move one thing at a time.

I still don't think Davis is likely to return. But with how adamant he has been about still wanting to be traded, why even waste the time on a meeting? That alone should be a reason for optimism. What's Griffin got to lose by trying and publicly saying everything?
Posted by Lsuismyfav
Kentwood, LA
Member since Mar 2007
1784 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

He does not want to be in New Orleans. He does not want to be in a small market. He does not want to play in a small arena. He does not want to play for a team with a small market share.

He wants to be in a big market, in a big arena, with big endorsement possibilities. That's it.




So it's what he wants and not what KLUCH is pushing on him?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95350 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:27 pm to
He better be careful what he wishes for.

I have a feeling he is going to be in a big city, still not making endorsement money, getting yelled at by fans for him underperforming based on what they gave up for him.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:30 pm to
Right. Why even take a meeting with Griff if you’re hell bent on leaving? The door is cracked even if it’s only slightly cracked

But I still understand the skepticism from AD of staying in Nola. You’ve spent 7 years with a franchise & know how they operate. Hard to change your perception when you’ve got 7 years of examples of how an organization shouldn’t be run
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 1:34 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95350 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:33 pm to
You meet for two reasons.

One, AD is better than any trade return you get on him.

Two, making a big pitch for him and letting the belief be there that we will sit on him if trade offers aren’t good enough encourages teams to bid high rather than lowball us.


Chances of keeping AD aren’t high but I wouldn’t want to write them off completely.

I’d also want the implicit admission by AD and Klutch that this is all about market size and not winning or organizational quality. Us making such a big improvement push and doing all the right things helps perception while implicitly making AD look like a lying little bitch for continuing to claim it was about winning and not about money / exposure.
Posted by BilJ
Member since Sep 2003
158758 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:33 pm to
Which is fair but two of his preferred destinations are also ran horribly and then seemingly has no interest in Boston, an organization that is actually run well.
Posted by NolaJake
Member since Jul 2017
123 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:34 pm to
I think the other big things is being setup to win next season. Say AD comes back, replace Randle with Zion, add in another mid tier guy like Moore, resign Payton. How many more wins does this team have? Do they have fewer wins?

For as good as the franchise has done the past 40 days, they've still won 0 games.

Now, the Pels are setup better for the long-term. But if AD wants to win NEXT season, yeah, maybe it isn't here.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:40 pm to
quote:

Now, the Pels are setup better for the long-term. But if AD wants to win NEXT season, yeah, maybe it isn't here.


True. And I don’t think we will suddenly compete for a top 4 seed in the West. I mean the playoffs aren’t even guaranteed. But what team has a better projection after they trade for AD?

Will Boston compete for a title with Kyrie (assuming he comes back), Hayward, & Horford opting in?

The Lakers with LBJ and vet minimum guys?

Brooklyn if they trade D-Lo, Harris, & Allen?

You could argue that the Pels have as good of a upgrade trajectory as anyone. The question that AD needs answered (pure speculation) is what is your vision to get better?
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 1:44 pm
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166246 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:41 pm to
quote:

but two of his preferred destinations are also ran horribly and then seemingly


he wants visibility. winning is a far cry from what he's truly looking for.
Posted by Bronc
Member since Sep 2018
12646 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Right. Why even take a meeting with Griff if you’re hell bent on leaving? The door is cracked even if it’s only slightly cracked

But I still understand the skepticism from AD of staying in Nola. You’ve spent 7 years with a franchise & know how they operate. Hard to change your perception when you’ve got 7 years of examples of how an organization shouldn’t be run



I think any honest reading of AD's feelings right now is simple, he wants to win, and he wants to win in what he perceives as a glamour market. Maximizing money is important, but it isn't an overriding concern.

If faced with a tradeoff, winning or being in a glamour market, he clearly prefers the glamour market. Evidenced by his willingness to go to even more dysfunctional organizations that just so happen to be in glamour markets.

Which puts the Pelicans in a pretty difficult spot to persuade him. You're unlikely to convince him to both shift his priorities AND make the case that the organization he has grown distant from is where to do that. I think there is no downside to meeting with him, but I also think the probability of it working is probably below 30%. And that is likely being generous IMO.
Posted by NolaJake
Member since Jul 2017
123 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:46 pm to
The Knicks if they land 2 other stars. Even AD, Kemba and, say, Kyrie probably do in the short term. Especially with what that does to Boston and Leonard potentially not staying with the Raptors.

LeBron and AD would be a damn good start. Look at what LeBron was doing with that team up until his injury.

I don't see Brooklyn moving Russell.

So I think there are some better options for next season, or at least the appearance of better options since there are a lot of moving parts to them.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:47 pm to
we see all the pros and cons bc we are more emotionally detached. But it’s hard think about situations clearly when you’re emotionally involved and/or when you’ve got your mind made up about something. That’s just human nature
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95350 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:51 pm to
He goes with what his mind is made up about and it is just him and LeBron on the Lakers.

No picks for years (picks plus pick swaps in off years), no Ball, no Ingram, no Kuzma, no nothing.

And the Laker front office is a dumpster fire making Phoenix and New York look appealing.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:54 pm to
I think that’s the key. The appearance of what could be in NY or LA. Having his cake and eating it too. Competing for championships in big markets. That type of dopamine hit is an insanely strong motivator


So you’re right there are appearances of greener pastures, but how many moving parts do there need to be before AD thinks he has a better chance in nola?
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 1:58 pm
Posted by NolaJake
Member since Jul 2017
123 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:57 pm to
I'm probably the biggest believe in the grass isn't always greener you will ever meet (been burned a few times on that!).

But I also get it from AD's perspective. None of the changes likely mean much (at least today, Griff is a helluva salesman could change things when they meet) until it translates to wins. That can't happen till the season starts. Does AD want to take that chance here after the past 7 years?
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95350 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 1:58 pm to
I just find his choices interesting to say the least.

The Lakers and Knicks are two of the bigger dumpster fires right now in huge markets.

Why no Boston, Chicago, or other markets in play?

And don’t say it is because Chicago’s front office and ownership sucks. His top two choices are owned by Dolan and the Buss family, both of which are worse than Reisendorf.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 2:00 pm to
My opinion is that he doesn’t. He doesn’t owe us anything. Even though we as fans like to think he does.

So you can talk his ear off if youre David Griffin, but him and Langdon won’t be on the court.



A different thought, he might just want a change of scenary. Might not have anything to do with New Orleans. I have friends that move for no reason lol
This post was edited on 5/23/19 at 2:10 pm
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
95350 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 2:03 pm to
A change I can understand. Focusing only on the Lakers and Knicks defeats the claim of wanting to win.
Posted by DeionDeion
New Orleans, LA
Member since Apr 2010
6110 posts
Posted on 5/23/19 at 2:11 pm to
I agree. The inconsistency are abundant. I would rather AD say “I hate the city and I’m ready to move” than all this other posturing stuff. It insults our intelligence. But again hindsight is 20/20
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram