- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clips building offer for AD?
Posted on 2/6/19 at 6:59 am to teke184
Posted on 2/6/19 at 6:59 am to teke184
The Clippers just traded arguably their best player while they're on the playoff bubble because they weren't planning to resign him anyway because they plan to get 2 max guys this offseason. Balmer dropped $2 Billion for the team without blinking an eye. He will be all in on trading for AD. An added bonus is if the Clippers drop out of the playoffs this year they keep their pick which weakens Boston's non Tatum asset portfolio. I don't really want the Clippers package but I think they leap frogged the Lakers and will push the Celtics to give a strong offer.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:01 am to teke184
quote:
Is Bledsoe hurt?
I’d take him for salary purposes plus a sweetener such as a young guy or a pick.
what in the world
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:04 am to MrPappagiorgio
Point right now is to get young prospects and tank the rest of the season.
Taking the expiring contract of an injured guy plus getting a pick or a young player accomplishes that.
Taking the expiring contract of an injured guy plus getting a pick or a young player accomplishes that.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:05 am to TigerinATL
Honestly, I think most serious bidders would leapfrog the Lakers if only because they aren’t trying to sell us a shite sandwich and tell us it is fine dining.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:13 am to teke184
Trading expiring for expiring doesnt make sense for either team
also, Eric Bledsoe is the Bucks best guard and isnt hurt. They arent moving him and a 2nd piece for a 6th man type PF
also, Eric Bledsoe is the Bucks best guard and isnt hurt. They arent moving him and a 2nd piece for a 6th man type PF
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:18 am to teke184
You pointed out in another thread the Clippers bowing out of the playoff race makes the Kings more likely to get in, so that's 2 of Boston's non Tatum trade assets that this move weakens. I still take Tatum and stuff over the Clippers, but the Clippers having a real offer while weakening Boston's other assets really helps the Pels if Tatum is the primary goal.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:23 am to teke184
Bledsoe and Maker (Maker isnt good, but better than Diallo)
Bledsoe
Jrue
Knox
Zion
Okafor
Or
Bledsoe
Jrue
Brown
Tatum
Okafor
Wouldnt be a bad team to build on as long as Bledsoe doesnt demand much money in a new deal
Bledsoe
Jrue
Knox
Zion
Okafor
Or
Bledsoe
Jrue
Brown
Tatum
Okafor
Wouldnt be a bad team to build on as long as Bledsoe doesnt demand much money in a new deal
Posted on 2/6/19 at 7:24 am to Soggymoss
quote:
Bledsoe doesnt demand much money in a new deal
wait for it...
Klutch client
Posted on 2/6/19 at 8:49 am to MrPappagiorgio
I don’t actually want Bledsoe if he is healthy.
I want injured players or shite players on expirings PLUS a sweetener of either a young player or a pick.
I’d take Teletovic but I think they aren’t allowed to trade him since he is considered medically retired.
Jason Smith is on a small deal and may be expendable if they get Niko.
Maker is the kind of guy I want as he has made it clear he isn’t happy with his playing time there. Not that we need a malcontent as much as he is on a rookie deal for another season and they don’t necessarily need him.
I want injured players or shite players on expirings PLUS a sweetener of either a young player or a pick.
I’d take Teletovic but I think they aren’t allowed to trade him since he is considered medically retired.
Jason Smith is on a small deal and may be expendable if they get Niko.
Maker is the kind of guy I want as he has made it clear he isn’t happy with his playing time there. Not that we need a malcontent as much as he is on a rookie deal for another season and they don’t necessarily need him.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 9:24 am to TigerinATL
quote:I don't see where the Clippers have top level players. Harrell is a nice player on a great contract, but SGA is a project.
You pointed out in another thread the Clippers bowing out of the playoff race makes the Kings more likely to get in, so that's 2 of Boston's non Tatum trade assets that this move weakens. I still take Tatum and stuff over the Clippers, but the Clippers having a real offer while weakening Boston's other assets really helps the Pels if Tatum is the primary goal.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 9:27 am to NOSHAU
It doesn't matter. The bottom line is they will probably be willing to give you all of their assets which in the process has diminished Boston's non Tatum assets which should put more pressure on Boston to include Tatum.
I want all the extra picks and players we can squeeze out of any deal because those can be flipped for other things, but since this team has no intention of starting a Process, it's really important to get a Tatum or Zion out of trading AD.
I want all the extra picks and players we can squeeze out of any deal because those can be flipped for other things, but since this team has no intention of starting a Process, it's really important to get a Tatum or Zion out of trading AD.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 9:36 am to NOSHAU
They have SGA, Harrell, Shamet, Gallo, Jerome Robinson (they are high on him but he's barely played), plus the two picks they just got from the Harris trade. It isn't anything jaw dropping but it could drive the other offers up for sure
Posted on 2/6/19 at 9:41 am to Not Cooper
And to piggyback, they still can turn Lou Will and Beverley into more assets before the deadline.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 10:12 am to TigerinATL
Agreed more buyers in the market mean that the asking price is driven up. I wasn't sure what the protection was on the Boston pick but now that I know, I'm sure Boston isn't happy with this trade.
I do think Harrel, Sweet Lou, Gallo, and a few picks for AD & Solo is a better package than LAL though not ideal because we get older & don't accumulate many future assets (Harrel - 25; Gallo - 30; Lou - 32). But It would still allow the LAC to have enough space to pair AD with say Kawhi Leonard.
I do think Harrel, Sweet Lou, Gallo, and a few picks for AD & Solo is a better package than LAL though not ideal because we get older & don't accumulate many future assets (Harrel - 25; Gallo - 30; Lou - 32). But It would still allow the LAC to have enough space to pair AD with say Kawhi Leonard.
Posted on 2/6/19 at 10:14 am to DeionDeion
You don't want Gallo. Wrong side of 30 plus injured a lot
I suggested Harris, Harrell and SGA a few months ago but that can't happen now
I suggested Harris, Harrell and SGA a few months ago but that can't happen now
This post was edited on 2/6/19 at 10:15 am
Popular
Back to top


2






