- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: check in if you hate the trade
Posted on 6/28/13 at 12:49 pm to EarthwormJim
Posted on 6/28/13 at 12:49 pm to EarthwormJim
its not like you have to keep those draftees forever and ever.
continually selling picks for vet signings will get a non glamor team in trouble- see Phoenix or Hornets.
theyve got their core. its about fit and filling in the gaps now.
maybe the new cba changes the market and makes calvin booth/posey/gooden absurd signings less likely. but if not, id rather roll the dice on a locked in, cheap rookie shooter than overpay a guy like martell webster to be a complementary floor spreader.
edit: just to be clear, I like the jrue move. dont care about the 2014 pick that much becauss this team will be in the playoff hunt. but I do worry about the franchise's and demps's history of moving picks so frequently.
continually selling picks for vet signings will get a non glamor team in trouble- see Phoenix or Hornets.
theyve got their core. its about fit and filling in the gaps now.
maybe the new cba changes the market and makes calvin booth/posey/gooden absurd signings less likely. but if not, id rather roll the dice on a locked in, cheap rookie shooter than overpay a guy like martell webster to be a complementary floor spreader.
edit: just to be clear, I like the jrue move. dont care about the 2014 pick that much becauss this team will be in the playoff hunt. but I do worry about the franchise's and demps's history of moving picks so frequently.
This post was edited on 6/28/13 at 12:56 pm
Posted on 6/28/13 at 12:55 pm to tgr4ever
quote:
He's a beast.
with a slightly above average PER
Posted on 6/28/13 at 12:58 pm to corndeaux
quote:
its not like you have to keep those draftees forever and ever.
continually selling picks for vet signings will get a non glamor team in trouble- see Phoenix or Hornets.
theyve got their core. its about fit and filling in the gaps now.
I get it, and that's definitely one way to fill in around your core. But there's also teams out there like San Antonio that finds retreads, d-leaguers, and guys that have been cut to fill in around their core guys.
Trying to find lightning in a bottle continuously through the draft can get you in trouble fast.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 1:06 pm to lsuguy13
quote:
1 time all star by default. Go read rohans article. Path analysis thread to clear it up.
Read it and he admits that Holiday deserved to be there:
quote:
It's why I'm so wary of those running around yelling "All-Star!" Dig deeper, and whether or not he deserved to be one last year (he did), and things get far more troubling.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 1:26 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
But there's also teams out there like San Antonio that finds retreads, d-leaguers, and guys that have been cut to fill in around their core guys.
Never said they can only add on via draft. Dell has been great a finding lightly regarded players so far and I expect that to continue.
As for the Spurs, Green, Diaw, Mills, and Neal are the only rotation players that weren't drafted by the team or had their rights acquired on draft night (Leonard for Hill who was a pick of theirs too). Ignoring their big 3, that still leaves Leonard, Splitter, Bonner, Joseph, De Colo plus Blair who fell out of favor but isnt awful.
Seriously, when was the last time the Spurs traded a 1st, future or otherwise leaving themselves without a pick?
quote:
Trying to find lightning in a bottle continuously through the draft can get you in trouble fast
Anyone thay expects lightning in a bottle from where the Pels should be picking the next several years is just unreasonable. I do expect them to find rotation guys that fit to go along with the spare parts Dell has a way of finding.
Its about hedging bets with the picks and smart signings as the cap space shrinks around the core
Posted on 6/28/13 at 2:11 pm to Scrowe
I like holiday. Did we get better ? Yea. Are we a playoff team no. Without holiday I think we are picking around the same range as this year in the best draft in 10 years. Just didn't want to give up the 2014 pick.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 2:15 pm to lsuguy13
Where did you think we were picking next year, just wondering? Also, at what pick do you consider us getting better value with the trade we made?
Posted on 6/28/13 at 2:26 pm to Scrowe
With holiday well be in the dreaded 9th-11th place in west. Without him top 7 pick. I just think next year is loaded and didn't want to give up a pick next year. We are giving them a top 6 and a top 10-12 pick IMO. That's a lot. frick we could have gotten RR or cousins throwing inGV . It boils down to me raother get a top 5 pick then be 10-11 west. Again its my opinion. He's only a slight upgrade over GV
Posted on 6/28/13 at 2:27 pm to corndeaux
quote:
that still leaves Leonard, Splitter, Bonner, Joseph, De Colo plus Blair who fell out of favor but isnt awful.
Bonner was brought into the league by Toronto.
quote:
Seriously, when was the last time the Spurs traded a 1st, future or otherwise leaving themselves without a pick?
Stephen Jackson for a first in 2012 I believe. And 2009 they were also without a draft pick.
Since 2007 the only draft pick to make a major impact on the Spurs are Splitter, Leonard, and you can throw Hill in there as well. And all this goes back to prove my point that the draft is a crapshoot and you use it as one of the tools to help build your roster, but not the only one and not even necessarily the most important one.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 2:36 pm to EarthwormJim
And everyone's calling me stupid and all kind of other names for my opinion. You don't see me doing that to y'all. I respect respect y'all opinion
Posted on 6/28/13 at 3:48 pm to lsuguy13
quote:
He's only a slight upgrade over GV
This may be true offensively, even though Holiday is much faster, better at getting by defenders, and a better scorer, but Holiday is so much better defensively. The fact that you think he is only a slight upgrade pretty much says everything anyone needs to know about your basketball knowledge.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 3:57 pm to lsuguy13
There may be a reason as to why they're calling you that.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 4:20 pm to JayJay2
As said before look at james harden...look at cp3 and our deal...always take the known commodity...03 was loaded...the no 2 pick yielded what for detroit with darko? a young allstar with no injury history is a steal...in the same draft as mj and hakeem there was portland...our young corps cant get use to losing otherwise it becomes your identity....the bulls didnt draft pippen...sometimes the final piece comes along in time. even sniffing the playoffs means we are getting closer. besides dell isnt done.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 4:28 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
major impact
but thats the point. once your core is set you are limited in finding ways to get useful players. You aren't finding impact players outside of the top 5 most years unless you get lucky. You can find rotation guys and perhaps moveable assets (e.g.Tobias Harris was the pick the team gave up for Bayless)
Limiting those options on a consistent basis, as this franchise has done over the years, is short sighted IMO.
Its not like finding a Green or Neal to come in off the street and have a major impact is less of a crapshoot than the draft.
Again Im not against moving picks or the Jrue trade, and im not saying the draft is the only way to find help. Just concerned that the FO doesnt value 1sts as much as they should.
Posted on 6/28/13 at 4:43 pm to JohnnyKilroy
quote:
Yea. The HOU trade looked like it could have been positive for both teams. Turns out Houston got WAYYYYYYYYY better and OKC got worse.
I think that is likely what will happen here.
I agree
Posted on 6/28/13 at 4:48 pm to corndeaux
This is 100% a great trade for the pelicans and to be honest neither team got ripped off. A pg in this league is everything and a few years from now holiday will be the best in the league and if not he will be a top 3. This kid is young enough to be in this years draft and anyone who is on this thread saying this is a bad trade really does not know anything about basketball. For one ya we gave up our 2014 draft pick but you don't realize this stacked class of the can't miss players are in the top 5 which we are protected on in case we decide to tank. We are not missing out on anything not to mention we don't need the Harrison twins who would be the 6th or 7th pick in all likelihood. Having watched every game last year I know that the pelicans were in almost every game and barely lost to most even going up big on good teams. If you say that the stats between Vasquez and holiday make them the same player one more time then you don't ever deserve any respect on basketball topics ever again. Holiday is head and shoulders better than Vasquez purely because of his speed and all around athleticism... It's not even close. Great trade by demps and this is robbery. Once again if you think this trade sucks then you are a moron no other way to put it. We are serious playoff contenders and we really don't even need a new small forward all that much bc we have so many scorers surrounding aminu who is a great defensive player. This team has serious potential now just wait and see.
This post was edited on 6/28/13 at 4:59 pm
Posted on 6/28/13 at 4:49 pm to corndeaux
quote:
once your core is set you are limited in finding ways to get useful players
How'd Dallas get Tyson Chandler?
How'd New York get Tyson Chandler?
Even the Nets found a way to add 2 high priced players. I read their payroll with tax will be $170 million

It won't be easy, but if Demps can build a winner he should be able to find a way to keep it going.
quote:
Just concerned that the FO doesnt value 1sts as much as they should.
Demps has a scouting background and got his job largely because he came from an organization that valued drafting talent. But the numbers back up that Jrue is more valuable than the picks we gave up. I posted this in another thread earlier but it seems appropriate here.
Demps traded uncertainty for certainty. The odds of 6-10 being an A or B level player are 34%. LINK / So 66% of the time each pick we gave up will be C level or worse, the type of player Demps has shown quite capable of getting for cheap. I always sucked at probabilities so math nerds correct me if I'm wrong, but to have both 33% probabilities hit, the only situation in which we actually got worse instead of being better off or staying the same, is 11%. So the odds are 89% that Demps stayed the same or improved the franchise while shifting the window of winning ahead a few years.
This post was edited on 6/28/13 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 6/28/13 at 5:12 pm to lsuguy13
I just read this whole thread just to figure out.....
There's a whole lotta dumb in here...
There's a whole lotta dumb in here...
Posted on 6/28/13 at 5:26 pm to TigerBait2008
Love the trade, not too happy about giving up next year but we got a young franchise all star point guard. He's proven and thats all you got to know
Posted on 6/28/13 at 6:34 pm to TigerinATL
quote:
How'd Dallas get Tyson Chandler?How'd New York get Tyson Chandler? Even the Nets found a way to add 2 high priced players. I read their payroll with tax will be $170 million
Well if Tom's willing to pay the tax penalties like those teams, then they can hand out picks like roofies in a frat house for all I care.
I read somewhere that if BK were the only tax paying team, they would pay each team in the league about $3million

I like the Jrue move. I think it was a no brainer. I dont like the history the franchise has of giving up picks going back to the 08 draft. Thats all Im trying to say.
Again, I am all for the Jrue move and the price it took to get him
Popular
Back to top
