Started By
Message

Celtics will be the best trade partner

Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:13 pm
Posted by GeauxZone90
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2010
2922 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:13 pm
Give us a proven player like Tatum and add in brown. We would be set
Posted by dj30
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2006
28724 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:15 pm to
Was just about to start a thread. Im all back on the Celtics wagon now.
Posted by Large Farva
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2013
8317 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:16 pm to
I’m a Knicks lean.
Posted by Kato
Sec 102
Member since Nov 2006
2773 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:16 pm to
If I can’t have Ja then I agree, I want Tatum
Posted by Parrish
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2014
2125 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:16 pm to
quote:

proven player like Tatum


Not necessarily a universal opinion
Posted by supe12sta12z
Tiger Town
Member since Apr 2012
10389 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:17 pm to
Rights to the future Memphis pick, the Sacramento pick, and Boston’s own pick, both Brown and Tatum, and go from there. With Williamson on board, Boston’s package would have to be massive.
Posted by MCrun2
Member since Mar 2004
473 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:18 pm to
Kyrie won’t stay so no way they trade Tatum
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30290 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:19 pm to
AD to NYK for three #1s and a roster player..4 for 1..

Zion and Barrett together







Posted by burdman
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
20685 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:19 pm to
Kyrie’s decision is gonna have a lot to do with what the Celtics offer IMO
Posted by kadillak
Member since Nov 2007
7641 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:20 pm to
This kind of sours me on Boston, tbh. With Jrue and Zion, we need shooters and guys that can play well off the ball. I don't know if I see that with Tatum. I'm still open to it though.
Posted by TheRoarRestoredInBR
Member since Dec 2004
30290 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:28 pm to
Barrett can shoot!
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31587 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:35 pm to
I’d much rather Tatum than RJ Barrett.

Barrett COULD be a player like Tatum but he could very well be a bust. I’d rather the proven commodity.



ETA: but I also don’t think the Celtics trade Tatum once Kyrie bolts for LA or NYK. I’ll take the pic and Knox
This post was edited on 5/14/19 at 9:37 pm
Posted by Chalkywhite84
New orleans
Member since Dec 2016
27222 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:35 pm to
how would we possibly get ja if he goes 2.

Also I hope we take the Celtics deal unless they really just live the player they would pick at 3
I don't love rj Barrett as much as everyone else
Posted by Vegas Buffet
The Sierra
Member since Feb 2019
169 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Rights to the future Memphis pick, the Sacramento pick, and Boston’s own pick, both Brown and Tatum, and go from there. With Williamson on board, Boston’s package would have to be massive.


While more than offset by landing Zion, AD's trade market took a massive gunshot tonight.

Celts way in lead even without including Jaylen.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34900 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

AD's trade market took a massive gunshot tonight.


Wait what?
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115826 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:56 pm to
Agreed. I think Tatum is better than Barrett.

The only thing I see is price control and the fact that they are were teammates.

I like Knicks assets though.
Posted by Vegas Buffet
The Sierra
Member since Feb 2019
169 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Wait what?


Of course it did. I thought Crewz had you guys schooled by now.

Barrett, Knox, DSJ, Robinson, and a Mavs pick in either 2021 or 2022.

Ingram, Ball, #4, Kuzma, Ball, Lakers 2020.

Unless a dark horse emerges, that market is weak af.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34900 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:00 pm to
So giving our two weakest trade suitors better pieces to drive up competition from our 3rd biggest suitor is - in your opinion - a bad thing?

Posted by Vegas Buffet
The Sierra
Member since Feb 2019
169 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:01 pm to
quote:

So giving our two weakest trade suitors better pieces to drive up competition from our 3rd biggest suitor is - in your opinion - a bad thing?


You think the Knicks landing outside of the top 2 was good for AD's trade market.

Is that honestly your take here? LMAOOOO
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34900 posts
Posted on 5/14/19 at 10:02 pm to
Is that the only variable you’re considering?

And you’re laughing at me?

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram