- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Are the Pelicans following the Bucks defensive model?
Posted on 12/29/20 at 12:51 pm to Fleur de Diable
Posted on 12/29/20 at 12:51 pm to Fleur de Diable
Like I said I'm not complaining. Just a little greedy because I feel we can be even better and I have an idea of why we aren't, which is why I'd like to see to on/off splits with Adams.
0
Posted on 12/29/20 at 12:53 pm to Fleur de Diable
Which is impressive when you take into account the enormous drop off in defensive talent that occurs when Hayes or Melli have been on the floor and Adams off.
The overall PITP dont get terrible, but they take a hit.
Fun fact, when we have replaced either Bledsoe or Lonzo with Josh Hart, our PITP drop to around 37 per 48 minutes. Which is incredible. All small sample sizes to draw anything too meaningful from yet, but it’s interesting stuff
The overall PITP dont get terrible, but they take a hit.
Fun fact, when we have replaced either Bledsoe or Lonzo with Josh Hart, our PITP drop to around 37 per 48 minutes. Which is incredible. All small sample sizes to draw anything too meaningful from yet, but it’s interesting stuff
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:13 pm to Bronc
quote:
Which is impressive when you take into account the enormous drop off in defensive talent that occurs when Hayes or Melli have been on the floor and Adams off.
Exactly, I was surprised when I looked it up.
Josh is playing like a top flight glue guy right now. Hope he keeps it up for the rest of the year/we can somehow hold on to him for the future.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:22 pm to Bronc
What site are y'all using for individual guy's on/off stuff?
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:24 pm to Fleur de Diable
I think the one thing in our favor for getting Hart back on a decent deal is he isn't a huge scoring guy and isn'ta lights out 3 pt shooter (but decent enough). Teams love to overpay for scoring.
He may be more valuable to us than to other teams.
He may be more valuable to us than to other teams.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:26 pm to bonethug0180
I was digging into the team/lineups/misc on NBA.com, adjusted to per 48 minutes to create an even comparison between our overall PITP numbers as a team with how individual 5 man lineups perform
Edit: wouldn’t recommend taking a whole lot from that stuff about Hart though, more just interesting to look at, sample size is really small and all, plus you have other variables.
Edit: wouldn’t recommend taking a whole lot from that stuff about Hart though, more just interesting to look at, sample size is really small and all, plus you have other variables.
This post was edited on 12/29/20 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:36 pm to Fun Bunch
I dug into the defense in today's podcast: LINK
It's really hard to contest the three point shot in the NBA, even running guys off the line doesn't really work. So may as well protect the paint--the Pels do a good job of limiting shots at the rim but not a good job of forcing misses there.
It's really hard to contest the three point shot in the NBA, even running guys off the line doesn't really work. So may as well protect the paint--the Pels do a good job of limiting shots at the rim but not a good job of forcing misses there.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 1:39 pm to NolaJake
Thanks, always appreciate your analysis and pods! Will put this on my playlist for the drive home.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 2:21 pm to Bronc
quote:
I was digging into the team/lineups/misc on NBA.com, adjusted to per 48 minutes to create an even comparison between our overall PITP numbers as a team with how individual 5 man lineups perform
Thanks. Didn't realize they updated that website that much. Been a minute since I really been on there.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 3:18 pm to Bronc
quote:
Thanks, always appreciate your analysis and pods! Will put this on my playlist for the drive home.
Appreciate you listening!
quote:
Thanks. Didn't realize they updated that website that much. Been a minute since I really been on there.
The NBA site updates daily and is an incredible tool for stats.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 3:22 pm to NolaJake
I listened this morning and at lunch today. I had happened to hear that Lowe talked about it so I had heard that first before yours.
Yours was much more in depth analysis as usual.
The stat regarding the amount of actual contested 3s in the NBA was eye opening.
Yours was much more in depth analysis as usual.
The stat regarding the amount of actual contested 3s in the NBA was eye opening.
This post was edited on 12/29/20 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 12/29/20 at 3:41 pm to Fun Bunch
This is not meant to throw stones at one or the other, but which do you prefer between Locked On and In the NO?
I feel I just can't take any more pods on right now, just too many in the pipeline. I listen to In the NO, but never heard the Locked On.
I feel I just can't take any more pods on right now, just too many in the pipeline. I listen to In the NO, but never heard the Locked On.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:06 pm to shel311
Locked On by a lot, and that is not to suck up to Jake or anything. 
I prefer the short form, daily podcast. Jake does them 5ish times a week so they tend to be far, far more to the point, with much more of an emphasis on data. I also appreciate that he essentially does a table of contents at the beginning of each podcast.
In the NO comes out too sporadically, and they are long and rambling. I don't mind that either and listen, but Locked On is a much better resource.
Pelicans Plus is another decent one, more similar to Locked On.
I prefer the short form, daily podcast. Jake does them 5ish times a week so they tend to be far, far more to the point, with much more of an emphasis on data. I also appreciate that he essentially does a table of contents at the beginning of each podcast.
In the NO comes out too sporadically, and they are long and rambling. I don't mind that either and listen, but Locked On is a much better resource.
Pelicans Plus is another decent one, more similar to Locked On.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:17 pm to Fun Bunch
Appreciate it! That's the goal. Lots of the national media is REALLY good. But they don't have the time to be as in depth and nuanced like the local media are. It's one of the reasons why I love what we're doing at Locked On. It's not a knock on anyone to say we know these teams better than the national folks.
And, yeah, many stats need context. Saying the Pels gave up open 3's doesn't tell the whole story. EVERY team gives up open three's. And explaining the issues around some of the numbers is important.
And, yeah, many stats need context. Saying the Pels gave up open 3's doesn't tell the whole story. EVERY team gives up open three's. And explaining the issues around some of the numbers is important.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:21 pm to NolaJake
There are actually a lot of good Pelicans or related podcasts right now. I don’t have time to listen to all but I thought about starting a thread linking a bunch of them.
It’s more a NOLA podcast that snarky covers a bunch of things, but the one Kushner does with his buddy is highly entertaining. Kush does not give a single frick.
It’s more a NOLA podcast that snarky covers a bunch of things, but the one Kushner does with his buddy is highly entertaining. Kush does not give a single frick.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:25 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Admittedly I'm going to complain about both, but I agree here. I don't like that In the NO just comes out whenever. Of course, not bashing the dudes, just saying.
In the NO comes out too sporadically,
On the other hand, a daily podcast may be a bit much for me also. Is it truly daily or is it after each game? Also, how long? Sorry for all the questions, i'm also just going to subscribe to it and check it out.
quote:Yea, that does sound great.
with much more of an emphasis on data. I also appreciate that he essentially does a table of contents at the beginning of each podcast.
Does this Jake fella have a Twitter account he posts about the Pels on?
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:35 pm to shel311
@NolaJake
Episodes are 5ish days a week. They are generally around 20-25 minutes I think.
Episodes are 5ish days a week. They are generally around 20-25 minutes I think.
Posted on 12/29/20 at 4:37 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:Yea, I like that a lot.
They are generally around 20-25 minutes I think.
Thanks!
Posted on 12/29/20 at 6:42 pm to shel311
Another great one is Bird Watch with Christian Clark and Jeff Nowak. They come out about once a week and both those guys are great.
A lot of good Pels podcast content out there
A lot of good Pels podcast content out there
Posted on 12/29/20 at 7:00 pm to Fun Bunch
Stan van gundy is such a good basketball coach.
He actually uses all of his resources and coaches the players.
Can't believe this team was allowed to fester for this long under great uncle al
He actually uses all of his resources and coaches the players.
Can't believe this team was allowed to fester for this long under great uncle al
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News