- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 4/30/14 at 10:12 pm to CheeseburgerEddie
Posted on 5/1/14 at 12:18 am to Kafka
Posted on 5/1/14 at 1:24 am to The Boat
love the falsetto singing in White Room...not.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 2:41 am to Burt Reynolds
one last troll before you pass out?
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:11 pm to The Boat
Just listened to the Little Steven's Underground Garage episode paying tribute to the Ed Sullivan Show.
Learned a fascinating bit o' trivia.
Due to lack of interest from a Capitol Records executive (he hated both rock & roll and harmonicas), that label did not release the Beatles' early singles and they ended up on a Chicago Blues/R&B label called Vee Jay. They didn't sell -- then.
Later, after the spectacular success of the Sullivan Show and "I Want To Hold Your Hand" going to #1, Vee Jay tried to release an album's worth of Beatles material they had. Capitol sued, and Vee Jay lost not only the album, but in a related development also lost their right to 10% of all money from the Beatles records for the next four years, because they hadn't paid back royalties of $859.
Learned a fascinating bit o' trivia.
Due to lack of interest from a Capitol Records executive (he hated both rock & roll and harmonicas), that label did not release the Beatles' early singles and they ended up on a Chicago Blues/R&B label called Vee Jay. They didn't sell -- then.
Later, after the spectacular success of the Sullivan Show and "I Want To Hold Your Hand" going to #1, Vee Jay tried to release an album's worth of Beatles material they had. Capitol sued, and Vee Jay lost not only the album, but in a related development also lost their right to 10% of all money from the Beatles records for the next four years, because they hadn't paid back royalties of $859.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:16 pm to OldTigahFot
quote:
Badge is actually a better song than White Room.
Written by....wait for it....George Harrison.
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:23 pm to The Boat
quote:
White Room is better and more innovative than anything the Beatles ever wrote
That's not even a top 5 Cream song
Posted on 5/1/14 at 7:27 pm to The Boat
Cream can have the Beatles' sloppy seconds
Posted on 5/2/14 at 12:39 am to WW
Why?
Cause they are the fricking Beatles, that's why.
Seriously, sheesh.
Cause they are the fricking Beatles, that's why.
Seriously, sheesh.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:35 am to OldTigahFot
quote:
to say it is more innovative than anything the Beatles did is pure lunacy (IMHO). Badge is actually a better song than White Room.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:38 am to HeadyBrosevelt
quote:
Burning of the Midnight Lamp >>>> White Room
Tales of Brave Ulysses FTMFW
Posted on 5/2/14 at 8:39 am to liquid rabbit
quote:No, it was EC and Harrison (well, officially), but the mention of it in this thread is pretty cheeky.
Written by....wait for it....George Harrison.
This post was edited on 5/2/14 at 8:42 am
Posted on 5/2/14 at 10:23 am to The Boat
quote:
White Room is better and more innovative than anything the Beatles ever wrote? It was recorded in the middle of 1967.
Notice nobody even tries to dispute the initial proposition (because any attempt to argue otherwise would be ludicrous). Just ad hominems and "OMG no wai I ? the Beatles 4 eva!"
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:01 am to Cold Cous Cous
quote:quote:Notice nobody even tries to dispute the initial proposition (because any attempt to argue otherwise would be ludicrous)
White Room is better and more innovative than anything the Beatles ever wrote? It was recorded in the middle of 1967.
What are we supposed to argue about? Who is "better"? That takes us into pointless bobbyray territory. IMHO The Monkees are better (i.e. I'd rather listen to them) than Led Zeppelin. Nothing you say is going to change my mind.
And what exactly is meant by "innovative"? I've already posted "Rain", which uses backwards tapes, droning Eastern rhythm and multiple drum tracks, and was released in 1966.
Are you saying the guitar work is superior? No one have ever claimed Clapton wasn't >>>>> Harrison, even George himself.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 11:19 am to Kafka
quote:
What are we supposed to argue about?
Exactly, there's nothing to argue about because it'd be preposterous.
quote:
The Monkees are better (i.e. I'd rather listen to them) than Led Zeppelin.
This guy gets it.
Posted on 5/2/14 at 12:35 pm to Cold Cous Cous
The Beatles less than 10 year run and what they accomplished in that short span is the very definition of innovative.
And I love Cream.
And I love Cream.
Popular
Back to top



0









