- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Today’s reason Pink Floyd > The Beatles
Posted on 10/26/24 at 2:12 pm to TCO
Posted on 10/26/24 at 2:12 pm to TCO
quote:
PF were just on another level
And The Beatles were on a level above them. I’m a PF fan and think Comfortably Numb & Wish You Were Here are great songs. But, PF had maybe 8-9 good songs as compared to 50+ by The Beatles. Not even close.
3
Posted on 10/26/24 at 8:53 pm to Easye921
quote:
Mine too. Coming Back to Life, High Hopes, Poles Apart. Just killer guitar work throughout the whole album.
Marooned is a masterpiece. with a amazing video
Posted on 10/27/24 at 11:13 am to TCO
Come on, man...their music is so different. The Beatles could not do what Pink Floyd did, and Pink Floyd could not do what The Beatles did. I enjoy them bot. It's like saying Mozart was better than Hank Williams.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 4:33 pm to TexTigah81
quote:
But, PF had maybe 8-9 good songs
Wow. They have 8-9 good songs per album.
Posted on 10/27/24 at 5:40 pm to TexTigah81
quote:
But, PF had maybe 8-9 good songs
this is how I know that you have zero clue about Pink Floyd.
Posted on 10/28/24 at 8:13 am to Easye921
quote:they had a good guitar player
Just killer guitar work throughout the whole album.
Posted on 10/28/24 at 9:45 pm to LanierSpots
quote:
this is how I know that you have zero clue about Pink Floyd.
I saw them at the Maravich Assembly Center in 1977. Great show but their music is a little too gloomy and depressing for me to really get into. Just my opinion.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 11:35 am to TexTigah81
quote:
I saw them at the Maravich Assembly Center in 1977
Oh, well nevermind.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 11:58 am to TexTigah81
quote:I'm pretty much with you. Overall, very meh.
PF had maybe 8-9 good song
quote:120+, but yeah, you're in the right direction.
50+ by The Beatles. Not even close.
Posted on 10/29/24 at 4:50 pm to TCO
quote:
Well if you go that route, the early pioneers of rock made it possible for the Beatles to exist.
the beatles said that themselves
Posted on 10/29/24 at 10:05 pm to supatigah
60 years and still THE standard....signed The Beatles.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 10:59 am to tiger81
+1000
I just listened to the British release of A Hard Day's Night and couldn't agree more.
60 years old and could still very well be the best cover to cover album of all time.
Btw, listen to the mono releases of their early catalog. ... amazing
I just listened to the British release of A Hard Day's Night and couldn't agree more.
60 years old and could still very well be the best cover to cover album of all time.
Btw, listen to the mono releases of their early catalog. ... amazing
Posted on 10/30/24 at 11:58 am to hogcard1964
quote:
60 years old and could still very well be the best cover to cover album of all time.
This chap would like to have a word. 990 weeks on the Billboard Top 200
Posted on 10/30/24 at 1:49 pm to TCO
Ok
Based on your reasoning, Michael Jackson's -Thriller, Madonna's - "Who's That Girl", "Nevermind" by Nirvana, Metallica's first album, 1989 by Taylor Swift, Saturday Night Fever, and Bob Marley's greatest hits are all also better.
Based on your reasoning, Michael Jackson's -Thriller, Madonna's - "Who's That Girl", "Nevermind" by Nirvana, Metallica's first album, 1989 by Taylor Swift, Saturday Night Fever, and Bob Marley's greatest hits are all also better.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 4:49 pm to hogcard1964
Not my reasoning. I was responding to your specific statement about “greatest album.”
Most of the artists you mentioned aren't even “bands,” and Marley/Legend is not a studio album.
Most of the artists you mentioned aren't even “bands,” and Marley/Legend is not a studio album.
This post was edited on 10/30/24 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 10/30/24 at 5:51 pm to TCO
I think DSOTM is actually a pretty good album.
I just listed a few albums that were on the charts longer than A Hard Day's Night. Which if we used the same gauge you did, we could make the claim that they were better. While they obviously weren't.
I just listed a few albums that were on the charts longer than A Hard Day's Night. Which if we used the same gauge you did, we could make the claim that they were better. While they obviously weren't.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 7:00 pm to hogcard1964
Understood thanks for clarifying.
Didn’t mean to be jumpy. I fricked up and sparred with a few PT idiots this week.
We can agree to disagree. I think there’s enough global concensus that we’re both probably right. Gilmour wins on instrumental talent though :)
Cheers.
Didn’t mean to be jumpy. I fricked up and sparred with a few PT idiots this week.
We can agree to disagree. I think there’s enough global concensus that we’re both probably right. Gilmour wins on instrumental talent though :)
Cheers.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 8:01 pm to TCO
Who is this Gilmour of which you speak ? All the Beatles are known worlwide by their first name.
Posted on 10/30/24 at 9:19 pm to TCO
quote:Over whom? Paul? nah George? still maybe nah.
Gilmour wins on instrumental talent though
Posted on 10/30/24 at 9:59 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Over whom? Paul? nah George? still maybe nah.
Cmon dude. This is absurd. Gilmour’s guitar work is revered as some of the best of all time.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News