- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sabbath Vs. Zeppelin
Posted on 8/2/25 at 2:10 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 8/2/25 at 2:10 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Did Sabbath rip any older artists off by not giving them proper credit until they were forced to?
What a lame take
1
Posted on 8/2/25 at 2:53 pm to Cdawg
More of a preference question. I should have been more clear in my OP.
I was gonna guess it would be more split but seems like more Zeppelin fans on here. I totally understand too.
I was gonna guess it would be more split but seems like more Zeppelin fans on here. I totally understand too.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 3:21 pm to 14&Counting
No, it's a legitimate question. I don't remember that ever happening to B.S.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 3:23 pm to BogeyTX
Led zeppelin all day everyday .
Posted on 8/2/25 at 3:48 pm to AuburnTigers
Yea if the mods could just shut this thread that’ll be great…
Haha. I thought there would be more of a balance. Boy was I wrong.
Haha. I thought there would be more of a balance. Boy was I wrong.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 5:07 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
No, it's a legitimate question. I don't remember that ever happening to B.S.
Meh……if anything Page ripped it off from the Jeff Beck Group who ripped it off.
Led Zepplin’s body of work>>>>>>Sabbath and I am big Sabbath and Ozzy fan.
This post was edited on 8/2/25 at 5:08 pm
Posted on 8/2/25 at 5:14 pm to 14&Counting
quote:
Led Zepplin’s body of work>>>>>>Sabbath
I don’t think this is true at all. Sabbath’s body of work stands up to LZ quite well.
Two very different bands though
Posted on 8/2/25 at 5:45 pm to BogeyTX
quote:
I like Sabbath better but I think Jimmy Page is better than Tony Iommi.
Who did Iommi plagiarize?
Posted on 8/2/25 at 6:51 pm to BogeyTX
I like both but prefer LZ with Led Zeppelin IV being the main reason.
Posted on 8/2/25 at 11:30 pm to BogeyTX
No fan of dark music so never cared for Sabbath.
Never a big fan of Zep but after learning of their thievery, kinda soured on them.
Never a big fan of Zep but after learning of their thievery, kinda soured on them.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 7:13 am to AlwysATgr
Can't imagine Robert Plant biting the head of a bat off
Posted on 8/3/25 at 7:47 am to Bayou
quote:
Can't imagine Robert Plant biting the head of a bat off
What’s this have to do with the music?
Posted on 8/3/25 at 8:28 am to Bayouboogaloocrew
quote:
I don’t think this is true at all. Sabbath’s body of work stands up to LZ quite well.
Two very different bands though
I love Sabbath too and they are really the godfathers of heavy metal but they were kind of a one trick pony,
No way Sabbath could ever write or perform some the acoustic, more melodic material that Zeppelin did.....and combined acoustic music with rock as exemplified by the greatest hit of all time: Stairway to Heaven. Jimmy Page had more talent and vision than all of them put together.
The plagiarism claim is a lame take: may have been sort of true on Led Zeppelin I but plenty of original hits on that first record and starting on LZ II there was no looking back.
There is no other band that sounds like Led Zeppelin they were their own unique thing.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 8:33 am to 14&Counting
quote:
acoustic,
Boring
Posted on 8/3/25 at 8:47 am to Kashmir
Though one.
I like both.
Just my opinion but I think Sabbath’s best is better than Zeppelin’s best. But Zeppelins lows are better than Sabbath’s.
Zeppelin to me was more consistent.
I like both.
Just my opinion but I think Sabbath’s best is better than Zeppelin’s best. But Zeppelins lows are better than Sabbath’s.
Zeppelin to me was more consistent.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 12:14 pm to 14&Counting
[quote]No way Sabbath could ever write or perform some the acoustic, more melodic material that Zeppelin did.[quote]
Once again I disagree. You aren’t giving Iommi enough credit. It’s not that they couldn’t have done it…they chose not to do it. Two different styles.
Once again I disagree. You aren’t giving Iommi enough credit. It’s not that they couldn’t have done it…they chose not to do it. Two different styles.
Posted on 8/3/25 at 12:30 pm to BogeyTX
Sabbath just because that’s more my taste in music.
Posted on 8/4/25 at 9:23 am to BogeyTX
Sabbath . But its close . Saw both in concert and Sabbath was better
Posted on 8/4/25 at 9:43 am to BogeyTX
By albums:
Black Sabbath vs. I = LZ
Paranoid vs. II =BS (this BS is perfection)
Master of Reality vs. III =BS (but close as both a bit of a let down)
Vol. 4 vs. IV =LZ and not really close
Sabbath B.S. vs. HOH =LZ
Sabotage vs. PG =BS (another awesome entry by BS and PG has some throw away material but lots of songs)
Technical Ecstasy vs. Presence =LZ
Pretty close by album and a tie if you leave off their respective seventh albums.
Black Sabbath vs. I = LZ
Paranoid vs. II =BS (this BS is perfection)
Master of Reality vs. III =BS (but close as both a bit of a let down)
Vol. 4 vs. IV =LZ and not really close
Sabbath B.S. vs. HOH =LZ
Sabotage vs. PG =BS (another awesome entry by BS and PG has some throw away material but lots of songs)
Technical Ecstasy vs. Presence =LZ
Pretty close by album and a tie if you leave off their respective seventh albums.
Posted on 8/4/25 at 11:17 am to rebelrouser
quote:
Sabotage vs. PG
Coincidentally, my two all time favorite albums. Just total perfection.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News