Started By
Message

re: Do you consider Britney Spears a "musician"?

Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:09 pm to

quote:

A musician who plays no musical instrument



Good. You agree
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:11 pm to
No, I don't agree. I was using your context.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5365 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:17 pm to
quote:

a person who makes music a profession, especially as a performer of music.



So yes, technically Britney (and Celine and Adele) are musicians. Im OK with that. My kindergartener is also technically an "artist", btw.

Britney is a very shitty one (although an excellent sex symbol/performer of dance routines and image creation etc). I give her full credit and deny her none of her achievements.

Celine is much better (although not really my cup of tea) and Adele is way better IMO.

My original point was that the human voice can reasonably be thought of as an instrument, with all the accordant training, skill, creativity, and expressiveness of a clarinet etc. Singing well is definitely a skill, just like playing the piano or guitar. Some work years on it, some are naturals and pick it up easily. Some have better equipment than others.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59087 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:19 pm to
i love love love love love britney spears!!!
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:22 pm to
quote:


So yes, technically Britney (and Celine and Adele) are musicians. Im OK with that. My kindergartener is also technically an "artist", btw.


If you say so.


quote:

My original point was that the human voice can reasonably be thought of as an instrument, with all the accordant training, skill, creativity, and expressiveness of a clarinet etc. Singing well is definitely a skill, just like playing the piano or guitar. Some work years on it, some are naturals and pick it up easily. Some have better equipment than others.



A person who sings for a living can reasonably be considered a musician. It's my understanding IRL she has a pretty damn good voice, but like lady Gaga, just puts out shitty music.
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 1:25 pm
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:24 pm to
No. I don't consider any of that pop shite to be music.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

No. I don't consider any of that pop shite to be music.


I figured it would come to this and in this case, you may have a point.
Posted by FinleyStreet
Member since Aug 2011
8000 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:34 pm to
Looks like she technically fits the definition, but that doesn't mean she's in the same category as BB King.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

No. I don't consider any of that pop shite to be music.


Well it's music, but I don't consider her a musician of any type.
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5365 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

A person who sings for a living can reasonably be considered a musician.



agreed


quote:

It's my understanding IRL she has a pretty damn good voice, but like lady Gaga, just puts out shitty music.


Link?

There are lots of examples of Gaga showing off her legit skills (when all the crappy pop production is stripped from her songs - see other thread, esp the Howard Stern appearance).

I am not aware of any vocal performance by Britney that was other than whiny and whimpering and overproduced. The closest to actual singing would be "Sometimes", but even that is very weak singing. (I really only know her hits, in fairness). I heard her sing in Kentwood when she was little (92-93 maybe) and even then it was like "awww look how cute", she carried a tune which is awesome for a small child, but thats about it.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298305 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 1:45 pm to
quote:


There are lots of examples of Gaga showing off her legit skills (when all the crappy pop production is stripped from her songs - see other thread, esp the Howard Stern appearance).


Lady Gaga is a created persona who puts out sugary teen stuff. Stefani Germanotta is a talented musician.

Like most talented people, she will forever be known by her stage persona and the music she puts out that people purchase.
This post was edited on 4/30/12 at 1:48 pm
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29537 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:16 pm to
Musician yes...


She makes her money performing music therefore she is a musician.


However she is no artist.
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:21 pm to
Wouldn't she just be a singer?

There's a difference between musician and singer
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29537 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:22 pm to
No there is not. A singer creates musical notes set to time. That is music.


Was Freddie Mercury a musician or just a singer?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:28 pm to
quote:


Was Freddie Mercury a musician or just a singer?


He was both. He played piano. Remember?
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29537 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

He was both. He played piano. Remember?



Correct. Bad example.


However I am sure britney plays an instrument of some sort as well. Very few people who make music for a living don't know how to play a musical instrument of some sort.

However even if she doesn't that doesn't change the fact that the human singing voice is indeed a musical instrument which by definition would make her a musician.

Why do you not consider the singing voice an instrument? When it has all the requirements necessary to make music?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:33 pm to
A singer is a singer. A vocalist.

That doesn't make them a musician.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29537 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

A singer is a singer. A vocalist.

That doesn't make them a musician



Is this not music then?
Posted by TheDoc
doc is no more
Member since Dec 2005
99297 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:39 pm to
Son house played guitar

Anymore bad examples?
Posted by TigerRad
Columbia, SC
Member since Jan 2007
5365 posts
Posted on 4/30/12 at 3:40 pm to
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram