- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who's subscribed to Brie Larson's YouTube channel ?
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:04 am to dawgfan24348
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:04 am to dawgfan24348
quote:Birds of Prey was a failure. $201 mil with the advertising money spent on it and the box office SS had can't be labelled as anything else.
You're using these as positives?
Are we not listening to fan scores now? Also he said it was a failure but nothing indicates it was.
quote:
The majority of Marvel fans believe it was a middle of the road MCU film. Which is no where close to "trash"
quote:
It was mediocre. Average. Nothing special.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:10 am to LNCHBOX
Birds of Prey made $201 million off an $82 million budget and a solid fan score on RT
Why are you choosing this hill to die on?
Also please learn the difference between trash and average
Why are you choosing this hill to die on?
Also please learn the difference between trash and average
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:12 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Birds of Prey made $201 million off an $82 million budget and a solid fan score on RT
Why are you choosing this hill to die on?
You think the studio is happy with that? You're delusional.
quote:
Also please learn the difference between trash and average
I didn't call it trash you fricking halfwit.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:16 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You think the studio is happy with that?
Maybe not but considering the fans were generally happy with it calling it a failure is just dumb
quote:
didn't call it trash you fricking halfwit
Then why are you arguing with me? I said the majority of fans considered good to average in response to someone calling trash
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:17 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Maybe not but considering the fans were generally happy with it calling it a failure is just dumb
You also completely ignored the huge advertising costs that would need to be recouped for it to be a win.
quote:
Then why are you arguing with me? I said the majority of fans considered good to average in response to someone calling trash
You actually called it good. It wasn't.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:18 am to AURaptor
quote:
CM was trash, and only earned its bank because of the tie in to End Game. Now that fans have wised up, they won't be burned again.
Eh, I think this wanting this to be true.
CM2 could make 400 million less than CM1 and still do Winter Soldier numbers. 1.13 billion is the biggest solo MCU movie other than one Iron Man and Black Panther. It has a long ways to fall before it hits average revenue for the MCU.
Put another way, if CM2 makes half as much as CM1, it's still a middle of the road MCU box office movie.
On Larson having a Youtube channel, I'm sure it is a move to build her personal brand. I doubt she really plans to abandon acting to become a Youtuber.
Youtube is a safe format for celebrities to build their personality and win fans. Pretty much all the Youtuber vlogging is a fake version of their reality, and I'm sure Larson is no different.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:23 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
It wasn't.
That's an opinion
Also I said the majority of fans rank it in the middle of MCU films which is average.
quote:
You also completely ignored the huge advertising costs that would need to be recouped for it to be a win.
Financially it made at least double it's money back and probably more. But I care more about what the fans think and the ones that saw it liked it. Now if there was something poor about the film it was that marketing which has nothing to do with the film itself.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:25 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
Also I said the majority of fans rank it in the middle of MCU films which is average.
You literally said it was good. Your words are right there
quote:
Financially it made at least double it's money back and probably more
That should be easy for you to back up with proof then.
quote:
But I care more about what the fans think and the ones that saw it liked it. Now if there was something poor about the film it was that marketing which has nothing to do with the film itself.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:32 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
The budget was $84.5 million
LINK
And the box office was $201 million
LINK
Again, you're leaving out the advertising and marketing costs.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:34 am to LNCHBOX
If you can show me the marketing costs I'll add it in.
But you also ignore my claim that the low gross total has more to do with poor marketing than the film itself as it has a strong fan score
But you also ignore my claim that the low gross total has more to do with poor marketing than the film itself as it has a strong fan score
Posted on 7/8/20 at 10:38 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
If you can show me the marketing costs I'll add it in.
quote:
But you also ignore my claim that the low gross total has more to do with poor marketing than the film itself as it has a strong fan score
Poor marketing?
Posted on 7/8/20 at 11:00 am to dawgfan24348
quote:
The majority of Marvel fans believe it was a middle of the road MCU film. Which is no where close to "trash"
It's not "Trash", but I'd argue that Thor: The Dark World is the only "Trash" movie in the MCU, and even then that's probably a stretch.
Captain Marvel is just plain forgettable. No one gives a shite. It's not re-watchable, not really. I can watch Winter Soldier, Civil War, Avengers, Infinity War, Endgame, Ragnarok, Homecoming, Iron Man 1 & 3, etc many, many times. Even Age of Ultron and Black Panther will get the occasional re-watch from me. CM just isn't worth it.
When I first saw it, I wondered if it was Larson or the directors giving her little to work with. She was good on Community, and I liked her in the United States of Tara.
Nowadays about the only time I see her emote like a human being is when Samuel L. Jackson is with her (and not just his scenes in CM). It's like she doesn't know how to human unless he's in close proximity.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 1:33 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Poor marketing? It was heavily marketed.
Heavy marketing doesn't mean it can't be poor marketing. It's not the same thing.
John Carter had a large ad buy but it was a terrible campaign that absolutely hurt the movie at the box office.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 1:57 pm to AURaptor
Unless she's fully naked no reason for me to watch.
Posted on 7/8/20 at 2:20 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
If you can show me the marketing costs I'll add it in.
quote:
“Birds of Prey” cost a reported $82 million to produce. Executives at rival studios put that number as closer to $100 million (due to elaborate sets and CGI) and estimate the film needs to make around $100 million domestically and $300 million globally to break even. Sources close to the production say the breakeven number is closer to $250 million
Variety Source
Due to the uneven nature of box office splits. Typically films need more domestic box office numbers to make money. Usually overseas they are lucky to get a 50/50 split of the take
Posted on 7/8/20 at 5:02 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Has a 78% fan score on RT and made $201 million at the box office. Not sure what you're getting at.
And yet we're hearing the sequel is axed.
Because BoP did a full 1/3 less than expected.
And got beaten out by a remade movie about a fast rodent.
If you believe RT is accurate and honest, you also believed the pre election polls in 2016.
This post was edited on 7/8/20 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 7/8/20 at 5:40 pm to Boo Krewe
quote:
ron man 2 is trash
3 isn't great either. All of the suits suddenly start busting in to pieces like they are made from Legos.
Dumb.
Popular
Back to top


1







