Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

To Kill a Mockingbird TCM

Posted on 5/1/26 at 7:02 pm
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
196424 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 7:02 pm
now
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
157193 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 9:06 pm to
quote:

To Kill a Mockingbird
In a small Southern town, a youth watches a relative protect a proud black man from a lynch mob










































































Filmed on location in Oxford MS (1949)



Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26491 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26491 posts
Posted on 5/1/26 at 11:32 pm to
quote:

Filmed on location in Oxford MS (1949)


I just found this one on Max
Posted by Boomdaddy65201
BoCoMo
Member since Mar 2020
4507 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 2:36 am to
“Thank you for my children, Arthur"
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63532 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 5:42 am to
quote:

To Kill a Mockingbird


One of Capote’s worst novels.
Posted by BabysArmHoldingApple
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2016
1339 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 6:56 am to
Naming a dog or child Atticus was a nascent form of virtue signaling.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
61001 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 8:25 am to
In any other year that would have won best picture, of course in any other year Peter O Toole would have won best actor for Lawrence of Arabia
Posted by Aeolian Vocalion
Texas
Member since Jul 2022
503 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 8:41 am to
I always vastly preferred "Intruder in the Dust" (1949). It seemed vibrant and realistic. It grabs you by the collar, and doesn't couch things. "Mockingbird" always struck me as a mopey, inward-looking tone-poem with self-conscious messaging, and shares a dreary-spooky aesthetic similar to "The Miracle Worker" (1961). Both those latter two are well-made and quite beloved, and I don't really knock them, but they just really aren't my cup of tea.
Posted by meansonny
ATL
Member since Sep 2012
26793 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 1:17 pm to
I dont know intruder in the dust.

Is it from a child's perspective?

Your issue with TKAM seems to be the writer's decision to take the voice of a 9/10 year old.

Fwiw, those are some of the reasons why I love the book and movie so much.
But I dont have a comparison to intruder in the dust to draw from
Posted by Aeolian Vocalion
Texas
Member since Jul 2022
503 posts
Posted on 5/2/26 at 7:12 pm to
No, I don't really mind the narrative from a child's perspective, nor the somewhat stylized approach to reality. Those can and often do resonate with me. Maybe it's partially because of the meshing of these elements with the heavy subject-matter that I found the results a little unappetizing. I don't know. Usually I also expect a child's perspective to be a bit more expressive of joyful wonderment, but the film's approach was more dark and moody and typical of post-war psychology, despite its earlier-era setting. A certain brand of unctuous artificiality that was common the dramas of that period, which I've never really cottoned to.

Probably also didn't help that my first introduction to the film was divided into two parts over two days, when it was screened on 16mm for us school students, during a teacher-workday period. Not saying that I have an active, total dislike for the film. It's tolerable enough. But I wish I could warm up to it more, especially since I had a nice chat one time with Mary Badham, about thirty years ago, and found her most pleasant.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram