Started By
Message
locked post

The Mist

Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:28 am
Posted by Archie Bengal Bunker
Member since Jun 2008
15520 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:28 am
People like to throw around the title of "worst movie ever" a lot on this board... but I will refrain from doing so.

I confidently rate The Mist... easily in my top 5 shitiest movies ever.


I did not cut it off, even though I wanted to at times. However, I did fast forward multiple times.


















/Spoilers/






I was fast forwarding hoping for some semblance of a decent ending, that would make this movie redeemable from the rating of one of the shitiest movies ever... BUT in true form, it goes and has an ending like that. Solidifying itself as one of the all time great shitfest.

/end rant
Posted by LSUtigahs28
Member since Sep 2008
14561 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:31 am to
WTF Are you talking about?
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39730 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:34 am to
I liked it. A little over the top with religion but who the hell knows how anyone would really respond if it looked like the world was ending.

For it to be in you worst top 5 you really must not have seen many movies.

Heck it is better than at least 5 of the last 10 Pacino films along. Righteous Kill, 88 Minutes, Gigli, The Recruit and S1mone.
This post was edited on 2/9/09 at 12:40 am
Posted by BBMcGee
TEAM BOOB
Member since Dec 2008
28500 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:48 am to
Watching "The Mist" one time was one time too many for me.

It had a completely different ending than the Stephen King story did, if I remember correctly.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39730 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 12:56 am to
Yes but King said he wished he had thought of that ending. I still think his ending was more grim for humanity as opposed to just a few people.
Posted by BOSCEAUX
Where the Down Boys go.
Member since Mar 2008
47734 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 1:10 am to
I liked it. I'm rarely fooled at how a movie will end but this one got me.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51903 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 6:16 am to
Spoilers

I liked it as well. Actually picked up the DVD the other day. Probably one of my favorite low budget films behind the Evil Dead series.

quote:


It had a completely different ending than the Stephen King story did, if I remember correctly.


FWIW, not only did King whole heartedly approve of the film ending, the movie ending was implied in the short story (outside of the final twist that is, which was added to make the ending provocative rather than just straight up depressing.)
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39730 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 6:59 am to
No. That ending was not even close to implied in the story.

SPOILERSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS


In the story, the mist is still out there and potential the whole world is covered in mist and monsters. That is what is implied at the end of the story.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51903 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 7:28 am to
SPOILERS


I didn't say that it was implied at the end.


There is a line in the short story after they leave the store when the main character notes that he has one bullet short of passengers and that if needed he would do the others and "figure" something out for himself.

The only original part to the Mist ending was the military coming in 5 seconds after he murdered folks.
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
39730 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 7:44 am to
Spoilersssssssssssssssssss.

THe mist going away was also new. In the book the mist did not evaporate. Basically the book was more bleak because all of humanity was covered in mist and monsters.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51903 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 7:48 am to
Yeah, that too....I just tied that in with the military bit though.
This post was edited on 2/9/09 at 8:06 am
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 8:00 am to
I was pleasantly surprised and liked it a lot.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150693 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 8:25 am to
quote:

I was pleasantly surprised and liked it a lot.

Same here.

It's been discussed on here before that the movie is less about the mist and what's in it, and more of a story of how quickly humans delve into their primal emotions when everything "normal" is stripped away.

I thought it was great.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
51903 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 8:36 am to
+1

The social commentary is the only thing that makes it notable.

Without it, it is just a very bad monster horror flick.
Posted by Augustus
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2006
8290 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:01 am to
Loved the movie, loved the ending. I also own it on DVD.
Posted by NoBama
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2008
678 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:04 am to
quote:

loved the ending


Your a sick frick if thats the case.
Posted by Augustus
North Carolina
Member since Sep 2006
8290 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:08 am to
quote:

Your a sick frick if thats the case.

I appreciate creativity and not the same cookie cutter shite that's at the end of every horror movie.
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
150693 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:11 am to
quote:

Your a sick frick if thats the case.

Why?
quote:

Your

Posted by NoBama
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2008
678 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 9:28 am to
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37263 posts
Posted on 2/9/09 at 10:18 am to
quote:

Without it, it is just a very bad monster horror flick.


I even disagree on this part. Darabont stated that he wanted an over the top 1950's feel for the film. I think he nailed it, particularly in the b&w version.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram