Started By
Message

re: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood opening day check in thread ***Spoilers Inevitable***

Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:23 pm to
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11751 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Literally the three best scenes


Cliffs flashback
Spahn Ranch
Final showdown

Those it? Because I agree
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59353 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:54 pm to
Replace Leonardo live scene redemption with girl as 1 and I agree.
Posted by MF Doom
I'm only Joshin'
Member since Oct 2008
11751 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 9:58 pm to
Man I thought those acting scenes were boooooooring
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
59353 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:02 pm to
I intended to mean that was three, but that is the scene that keeps Leo from offing himself (plot wise).
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37872 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:06 pm to
quote:

Dyke Van Dyke's show ended in 1966 so nobody was interviewing Morey Amsterdam and Rose Marie in 1969 dammit!

When CBS lost DVD, they reran it as a part of their daytime schedule (through 1969).

Rose Marie and Amsterdam were being interviewed together into the 90’s. They were both doing Sullivan, sitcoms, and talk shows in ‘69. They were good friends, she actually insisted that he was the only person they should bring in for the role.
This post was edited on 7/27/19 at 10:14 pm
Posted by McCaigBro69
TigerDroppings Premium Member
Member since Oct 2014
45288 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

Man I thought those acting scenes were boooooooring


I liked them.
Posted by LovemyTigers57
Member since Oct 2013
166 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:29 pm to
That interview of Rick and Cliff at the beginning was on the set of Bounty Law....but it was from the past since Bounty Law had been canceled by 1969, and that’s why Leo’s character was now doing guest spots on FBI, Lancer, etc. So that interview could have been done anytime from 1961-1966, when the Dick Van Dyke show was still airing new episodes and why the guy said he would be interviewing Morey Amsterdam and Rose Marie next time.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37872 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:33 pm to
You’re right.
Posted by Delacroix22
Member since Aug 2013
4537 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 10:58 pm to
Loved it

Absolutely loved it

The movie isn't about the Manson family.

It's a euphemism for "Old Hollywood" of Doris Day and how the Manson murders marked the end of golden Hollywood and transitioning into the pessimistic movies of the 1970s.

Leo is an old aging bastion of Old Hollywood and seeing the end coming. He IS old Hollywood. He's on the verge of tears, a nervous wreck, hiding a slight stutter.

But I digress

Brad Pitt's performance was strong as all hell. But goddamn Leo's performance I think was so underappreciated.

When he flubs his lines, then has his blowup in his trailer, and that scene where he's negotiating the ransom for that girl he kidnapped... holy shite that scene I thought to myself "now this is some fricking fantastic acting" and the little girl literally tells him "that was the best acting I've ever seen" .

"And you... I remember you what's your name?"
"I'm the Devil. And I'm here to do the Devil's work."
"...... nah it was dumber than that."

That last scene was UNREAL. I'd never imagine you could get a theater full of senior citizens to laugh and chuckle while Brad Pitt smashes people's faces in and people get their faces mauled by a Pit Bull and Leo torches a girl with a flame thrower.

Would see again, no doubt
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
32992 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 11:00 pm to
I put this film at the bottom of the QT collection. Maybe right above Django.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
41550 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 11:12 pm to
There's a scene where Leo is describing the book he's reading and he starts crying because it reminds him of himself. The more I think about it, the more I think that book is actually about Brad Pitt's character. He's the one who's useless after his stunt career is basically over and just finding ways to hang on and make himself valuable. He even gets his hip injured at the end. Leo is not the star he used to be but still has an ok career.
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 7/27/19 at 11:41 pm to
Passable but underwhelming.

Describes each of Tarantino's last 3 movies IMO.
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:23 am to
quote:

Reservoir dogs: great Pulp fiction: very good Jackie brown: bad Kill bill 1: great Kill bill 2: great Death proof awful Django: bad Hateful eight: good Basterds: bad


IB is 2nd to PF
Jackie Brown is an excellent movie
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
39841 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:32 am to
quote:

It's a euphemism for "Old Hollywood" of Doris Day and how the Manson murders marked the end of golden Hollywood and transitioning into the pessimistic movies of the 1970s.

Leo is an old aging bastion of Old Hollywood and seeing the end coming. He IS old Hollywood. He's on the verge of tears, a nervous wreck, hiding a slight stutter.




Everyone in this movie just wants to work in Hollywood. Everyone’s relationship with Hollywood is romantic but we all know there is something awful coming.

I might be reading too much into this but I kinda think QT sees himself in all the actors. He is just a humble filmmaker and wants Hollywood to be what it never was. I am not a wordsmith but I am curious to see how people connect this movie with QT/harvery Weinstein’s relationship and what we know about Polanski’s future legal troubles.
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35502 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 8:33 am to
Saw it yesterday. I’d describe it as ugh.

The acting was great. Seriously, the acting is fantastic by everyone.

The story is...non-existent. It’s like stuff is happening, but nothing is happening. And the movie was so long. If it was going somewhere, I wouldn’t have minded the time, but that’s a lot of time for such little payoff, story wise.

It’s watchable, but watch it at home and don’t waste your time at the theater.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
94724 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

It's a euphemism for "Old Hollywood" of Doris Day and how the Manson murders


1969 was such an important year. Certainly 1968 was no slouch with assassinations of MLK and RFK, riots, but 1969 had Woodstock, the Moon Landings and the Tate-Labianca killings all within a 4-week window.

That was "Peak Hippie" - and while 1969 was literally the last year of the 60s, that 4-week window marked the end of that whole era.

Film, television, music, discourse, American culture all turned stark and gritty almost overnight. This abrupt transition/change is largely what Hunter S. Thompson was talking about in the wave speech from Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas.

quote:

Strange memories on this nervous night in Las Vegas. Five years later? Six? It seems like a lifetime, or at least a Main Era—the kind of peak that never comes again. San Francisco in the middle sixties was a very special time and place to be a part of. Maybe it meant something. Maybe not, in the long run . . . but no explanation, no mix of words or music or memories can touch that sense of knowing that you were there and alive in that corner of time and the world. Whatever it meant. . . .

History is hard to know, because of all the hired bullshite, but even without being sure of “history” it seems entirely reasonable to think that every now and then the energy of a whole generation comes to a head in a long fine flash, for reasons that nobody really understands at the time—and which never explain, in retrospect, what actually happened.

My central memory of that time seems to hang on one or five or maybe forty nights—or very early mornings—when I left the Fillmore half-crazy and, instead of going home, aimed the big 650 Lightning across the Bay Bridge at a hundred miles an hour wearing L. L. Bean shorts and a Butte sheepherder's jacket . . . booming through the Treasure Island tunnel at the lights of Oakland and Berkeley and Richmond, not quite sure which turn-off to take when I got to the other end (always stalling at the toll-gate, too twisted to find neutral while I fumbled for change) . . . but being absolutely certain that no matter which way I went I would come to a place where people were just as high and wild as I was: No doubt at all about that. . . .

There was madness in any direction, at any hour. If not across the Bay, then up the Golden Gate or down 101 to Los Altos or La Honda. . . . You could strike sparks anywhere. There was a fantastic universal sense that whatever we were doing was right, that we were winning. . . .

And that, I think, was the handle—that sense of inevitable victory over the forces of Old and Evil. Not in any mean or military sense; we didn’t need that. Our energy would simply prevail. There was no point in fighting—on our side or theirs. We had all the momentum; we were riding the crest of a high and beautiful wave. . . .

So now, less than five years later, you can go up on a steep hill in Las Vegas and look West, and with the right kind of eyes you can almost see the high-water mark—that place where the wave finally broke and rolled back.


This post was edited on 7/28/19 at 12:58 pm
Posted by Suntiger
STG or BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
35502 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:02 pm to
quote:

It's a euphemism for "Old Hollywood" of Doris Day and how the Manson murders marked the end of golden Hollywood and transitioning into the pessimistic movies of the 1970s.


Maybe, if the ending were more true to life. Not sure what the ending here represents.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37872 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The story is...non-existent. It’s like stuff is happening, but nothing is happening.

Sometimes I think people need the plot to have a literal goal for the characters to strive for. Start the film with Morgan Freeman explaining what the End Zone is and each reel is the characters advancing twenty five yards. Character development is a wasted art.
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37872 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:15 pm to
By the way, this is Tarantino’s best opening weekend ever. So we may get a sequel where Cliff and Rick torch the terrorists at the Munich Olympics.
Posted by LSUGlory16
Mville
Member since Jun 2014
1165 posts
Posted on 7/28/19 at 2:47 pm to
Anybody catch the throwback character to Bastards with Antonio Margaritti???
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram