Started By
Message

OJ on ID

Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:37 pm
Posted by shamrock
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
3620 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:37 pm
Interesting facts about Jason Simpson who the PI says actually did it..always wondered about him and strangely enough LAPD never interviewed him
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76184 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 9:55 pm to
I got burnt out on OJ when it happened and still can't muster any interest in revisiting it.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108098 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 10:05 pm to
I bounced that idea with an old golfing buddy of OJ's. He said it was bullshite and the Juice had been acting weird for weeks before that. He knows that he killed her.
Posted by lsucoonass
shreveport and east texas
Member since Nov 2003
68446 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 10:10 pm to
I heard about this before

Was any of the sons dna discovered
Posted by shamrock
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
3620 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 10:28 pm to
No to the discovery of son's DNA and I'm kinda like the other posters in that I'm positive OJ did it and I'm burnt out on it as well..was just curious to see if additional info was actually coming out but looks pretty lame so far
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76184 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 10:41 pm to
I just can't see any new revelations coming out at this point. It's seems so obvious OJ did it. Maybe he had help. Who knows. But he did it and everyone knows it.
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 1/15/17 at 10:50 pm to
Watched it tonight. Still open to the possibility that his son may have played a part, but they've done nothing to eliminate OJ up to this point. So far, these episodes feel kinda padded, so I'm not holding my breath for any "big reveal"...

I'll admit that Lange guy seems protective to a fault, though...
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 7:42 am to
I will add this: most of what I've seen on this show (so far) is nothing I haven't already seen on the internet, EXCEPT the conversation with Goldman's friend who loaned him her car. She said LAPD returned her keys to her untouched in an evidence bag. According to the hosts, this is puzzling because if the keys were being used in self-defense to fend off the attacker(s) (she said the keys were soaked in blood), there'd be enough DNA on there to make it an open & shut case. When Lange found out they successfully talked to her, he called her a liar. She didn't come off as someone with an axe to grind, so I thought it was an interesting reaction by Lange...
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 8:14 am
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12722 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:16 am to
quote:


I got burnt out on OJ when it happened and still can't muster any interest in revisiting it.


So did I, but I kind of stumbled upon the espn 5 part oj series while my wife was watching it and it was fascinating
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
27668 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:27 am to
After watching all the OJ stuff last year, I'm done for a while

It will never change the verdict and it just gets my blood pressure up and pisses me off.

May he rot in jail
Posted by 417longhorn
Austin, TX
Member since Oct 2009
510 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:00 pm to
There is zero doubt OJ did it. Blood evidence, post-murder behavior, history of domestic violence, lack of alibi, OJ"s unexplained cut on his left hand, etc. all being coincidental would have astronomical odds.

Prosecution bungled the case and Ito allowed the trial to become a mockery, but the jury was still wrong.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 3:00 pm
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35447 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:10 pm to
Jason could have definitely done it.

Alibi was weak, had an alleged motive, was alleged to be slightly insane, carried chef knives on him, took meds and fit the description at the scene, he was always wearing a black wool cap.

And OJ's Bruno shoe footprints at the scene can definitely be explained by him going to the crime scene after Jason called him and told him what he allegedly did.

The key point, like in Making a Murderer...is that the almost total lack of blood (Despite what people remember or think because of what prosecutors said in the press prior to trial - trial showed pin prick blood stains) is that the lack of blood in the Bronco more supports someone checking out the scene to confirm a story than someone who was in a brutal knife fight with two people where apparently "gallons of blood were spilled everywhere" - unless OJ was wearing a Hazmat suit and dumped it into a storm drain, it's never made any sense.

Jason is just a theory but it's definitely plausible that OJ took the fall for his son.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 3:12 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76184 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:16 pm to
It was simply payback for the Rodney King fiasco. It was considered some sort of win for minorities as a whole. The evidence did not matter and I believe the jury (9 blacks, 1 Hispanic and two whites) would not have convicted even if OJ was caught on video. If Nicole Brown was black or if OJ was white, he's convicted quickly.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66891 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

will add this: most of what I've seen on this show (so far) is nothing I haven't already seen on the internet, EXCEPT the conversation with Goldman's friend who loaned him her car. She said LAPD returned her keys to her untouched in an evidence bag. According to the hosts, this is puzzling because if the keys were being used in self-defense to fend off the attacker(s) (she said the keys were soaked in blood), there'd be enough DNA on there to make it an open & shut case. When Lange found out they successfully talked to her, he called her a liar. She didn't come off as someone with an axe to grind, so I thought it was an interesting reaction by Lange...


I'd never heard that either. Crazy. At this point Lange is just an annoying windbag who can't stop making excuses for the investigation that was so poorly executed.
Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
12722 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:10 pm to
quote:

It was simply payback for the Rodney King fiasco. It was considered some sort of win for minorities as a whole. The evidence did not matter and I believe the jury (9 blacks, 1 Hispanic and two whites) would not have convicted even if OJ was caught on video. If Nicole Brown was black or if OJ was white, he's convicted quickly.


one of the juror's basically admitted this on the ESPN documentary
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86438 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

one of the juror's basically admitted this on the ESPN documentary


yeah and it's sickening. OJ was as guilty as guilty can possibly be but the prosecution fricked up so badly and it was made to be a black and white issue instead of actually trying the case at hand. Disgusting that he got off. Of course the minorities saw it as retribution for rodney king, while ignoring that this man heinously murdered another human being.



Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:19 pm to
It's pretty obvious Lange wants nothing to do with this show, and he probably drew the short straw as the LAPD's torch-bearer.

The title for this show is misleading. "Is OJ Innocent?". Of course he isn't, and they pretty much answered that question right out of the gate, lol...but I guess "Did OJ Have An Accomplice?" doesn't sound sexy enough...
Posted by vandelay industries
CSRA
Member since May 2012
2477 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:23 pm to
It's interesting, when the verdict was announced, none of my African-American friends were cheering for his acquittal as much as they were cheering for "the system", if that makes sense...
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

I'm kinda like the other posters in that I'm positive OJ did it and I'm burnt out on it as well.


One of the only things that made me question it was the complete lack of blood found in OJs truck. If he was at the scene and did the crime you'd think he'd have blood on him. Some of it would've made its way to the truck. I'm not saying he didn't know what happened and I'm not saying he was completely innocent, but the lack of blood on him and in his truck is what always left that doubt in my mind.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 5:39 pm
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76184 posts
Posted on 1/16/17 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

interesting, when the verdict was announced, none of my African-American friends were cheering for his acquittal as much as they were cheering for "the system", if that makes sense...

Of course. Cochran made the trial a referendum on civil rights. Once he managed 9 blacks on the jury, it was a foregone conclusion that he'd not be convicted.

And it's why all these shows about OJ are not interesting to me. And in a way, their existence gives credibility to that jury and that case.
This post was edited on 1/16/17 at 8:58 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram