- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/21/16 at 3:15 pm to abellsujr
A judge is duty bound to recuse himself from a case if he has a conflict of interest and a stake in the outcome. Seems to me we should expect the same of sheriff's departments and crime investigators. This case should never have gone to trial, even when there's a substantial chance that Avery committed a murder. This case should have been dropped the very moment the Manitowoc Sheriff's Department and the District Attorney broke their vow that Manitowoc would not participate in the investigation. They should have been made to apologize to the Halbach family for any lack of justice.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 3:22 pm to Jester
quote:
Deputy Corruptasfrick obviously shook the table vigorously enough for the key to defy quantum physics and pass through solid wood.
lets not forget the dip shite calling the license plate in and describing the vehicle to dispatch days before the car was found.
and saying oh someone must have described it to me.......
but why where you calling it in on patrol ??????????????
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 1/21/16 at 3:38 pm to abellsujr
You right.
Steve Avery's fated has been decided, he's locked up for life.
I have no problem with that, he's a pos, scumbag.
This is a pos, scumbag also. He is the root cause an innocent man went to prison and the actual prep remained free. Absolutely nothing will ever be done to this dude.
Kenneth Peterson
These cops are likely scumbags, they should be investigated.
However, they won't ever even be questioned.
Steve Avery's fated has been decided, he's locked up for life.
I have no problem with that, he's a pos, scumbag.
This is a pos, scumbag also. He is the root cause an innocent man went to prison and the actual prep remained free. Absolutely nothing will ever be done to this dude.
Kenneth Peterson
These cops are likely scumbags, they should be investigated.
However, they won't ever even be questioned.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 3:51 pm to StickD
Agreed. Regardless of Avery's guilt or innocence, the process was abused and there is no recourse for that. Which is bullshite.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:44 pm to JohnnyKilroy
I'm going to keep pounding this point, because a lot of people don't seem to understand it. Avery is guilty and is where he belongs. No matter what, he possessed a gun and is a felon. Nobody is denying this point and they have multiple witnesses to this fact. In the state of Wisconsin, that is a felony. That would be the forth time he has been arrested and served time for a felony. That qualifies him for the 3 strike law, which Wisconsin adopted in 1994. Maximum penalty for the gun charges is 10 years. Maximum additional penalty for repeater status is life. He has been in prison for 8 years. How did he get screwed over? Also, why should he be let go? I'd like one person to tell me how the gun charges aren't valid and he should be let go.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:47 pm to brmark70816
quote:
I'm going to keep pounding this point, because a lot of people don't seem to understand it. Avery is guilty and is where he belongs. No matter what, he possessed a gun and is a felon.
That's so lame of an argument.
This isn't Red China, bro. That's what you're hanging your hat on...life, for possessing a firearm?
Who cares? He was also a felon because the system screwed him.
This is an anti-NRA argument, not a legal argument.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 5:49 pm
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:52 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
He was also a felon because the system screwed him
He had felony convictions before the wrongful rape conviction, idiot
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 1/21/16 at 5:56 pm to brmark70816
Is someone in your family in law enforcement?
Do you have to believe in the system and it always works?
I'd argue that Steve was framed or really put on his course in life bc of sheriff Petetson, but unfortunately I don't care.
The system failed. It's not infallible. I'm speaking directly to Steve Avery initial 18 years in jail. How is no person held accountable for that. Well they were going to be, then who knows what happened. He snapped or he was railroaded again. It doesn't matter, he was already bent over.
Do you have to believe in the system and it always works?
I'd argue that Steve was framed or really put on his course in life bc of sheriff Petetson, but unfortunately I don't care.
The system failed. It's not infallible. I'm speaking directly to Steve Avery initial 18 years in jail. How is no person held accountable for that. Well they were going to be, then who knows what happened. He snapped or he was railroaded again. It doesn't matter, he was already bent over.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 6:06 pm to StickD
quote:
Is someone in your family in law enforcement? Do you have to believe in the system and it always works?
Hell no and I want the cops punished for tampering with the evidence (if it can be proven). I keep saying though that the guy should be in jail and nobody can deny that. You just can't throw out the laws that don't help him. He owned a firearm. That is illegal. My favorite player, S. Taylor, was murdered because he couldn't own a gun and defend himself. If a millionaire all-pro player can't own a gun, because of an old felony from college. Then a 3 time felon with a mile long rap sheet shouldn't own one either.
quote:
I'm speaking directly to Steve Avery initial 18 years in jail
I keep telling people, it's 12 years, not 18. He got 6 years for the assault charges on the cop's wife. That was his 3rd felony. There are no BS charges on his record. In the documentary, he admit to the first two and tries to deflect the 3rd case. But all of that stands. Not counting all of his other run ins with the law.
The one conviction is a bad deal. But you know what, he took 400k for that. If he wouldn't have broke the law, he would have probably got 4-5 million. But he's been made whole on that now. If he took the settlement, then he can't bitch about it anymore. It's just sour grapes and I don't feel any sympathy for him.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 6:35 pm to brmark70816
quote:So if Avery would have been exonerated after 6 years, you would say that he was never really served any time for the wrongful conviction? You also have to ignore that it's highly unlikely a person would have served anywhere close to 6 years for the gun change.
He got 6 years for the assault charges on the cop's wife.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 6:37 pm to brmark70816
quote:Did you measure it yourself?
mile long rap sheet
Posted on 1/21/16 at 6:55 pm to brmark70816
quote:By the way, what are all of these "felonies?" We have:
Then a 3 time felon
1. The gun incident with his cousin.
2. The wrongful conviction (doesn't count).
3. Teresa Halbach's murder.
Are there some unknown felonies OR are you misrepresenting misdemeanors as felonies (breaking and entering) to support your argument? If it's the latter, that would be very hackish.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:06 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
He had felony convictions before the wrongful rape conviction,
Your argument is still weak as hell and rings as nothing but vindictiveness...and to support his murder conviction because he was a "felon" in possession of a firearm is again, pretty vindictive and quite petty.
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). It says that anyone "who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" is barred from possessing a gun.
But Federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(20)(B), also says that a "crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" does not include "any State offense classified by the laws of the State as a misdemeanor and punishable by a term of imprisonment of two years or less."
The Supreme Court held that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms" protected by the Second Amendment is incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and applies to the states. [McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 3025 (2010)]
The inalienable right ratified in the second amendment, nor any part of the Constitution does not say a felon can't own a weapon.
Then that right, becomes a mere privilege.
But laws were passed - and yet nothing Avery was purported to do in the DOC rises to that level of violent Felon gun crimes. Unless you are bootstrapping his false rape conviction or worse his post-murder conviction...and just making character judgments.
Where in the Constitution does it say that government can disenfranchise a citizen of their inalienable rights after they have paid for their crime?
Whatever you feel about this issue, supporting the conviction of Avery because he simply owned a gun is preposterous.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:20 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
The plot thickens.
quote:
Former police sergeant and cold-case expert John Cameron believes he knows who killed Teresa Halbach — and it isn't "Making a Murderer" subject Steven Avery.
Cameron has a theory outlined on his website, as Uproxx previously reported, that an infamous serial killer named Edward Wayne Edwards, who's known to frame others for his murders, is behind the killing that's at the center of the Netflix docuseries.
And there are certainly some interesting connections.
What would connect Edwards to the murder?
1. Edwards is known to find victims or people to frame who have been spotlighted in the media. He may have discovered Avery through any of many stories on TV and other media when he was first exonerated for the brutal assault of a local female while she was jogging.
2. It's believed that Edwards is connected to many unsolved murder cases. Edwards' blog posts and letters to police, family of victims, and the press have led many to believe that he's guilty of murders he was never tried for. Investigators have long suspected Edwards may be involved in the Zodiac slayings.
3. Edwards liked to kill on Halloween. Halbach disappeared on that day in 2005.
4. Edwards had killed in Wisconsin before. In 1980, he killed Wisconsin couple Tim Hack and Kelly Drew. The crime would be called the "sweetheart murders." And it's believed he was an hour away from where Avery lived at the time of Halbach's murder.
5. Edwards likes to attend his victims' funerals and trials. He is believed to have been caught on HBO's documentary about the West Memphis Three. And Cameron discovered the below shot during the sixth episode of "Making a Murderer," with a man who looks like Edwards.
![]()
Is that Edwards standing behind prosecutor Ken Kratz?
Cameron spent some time in Wisconsin to try and identify the man, but was unable to do so.
Edwards died in 2011 while serving time in Ohio.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:26 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Whatever you feel about this issue, supporting the conviction of Avery because he simply owned a gun is preposterous.
I support his fricking conviction because he fricking did it.
Nevertheless, he was a felon, in possession of a firearm, and he was caught. Whether I agree with his right to own a gun or not is irrelevant.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:27 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
I support his fricking conviction because he fricking did it.
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:44 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Why do you hate the Constitution?
Why do you love murderers?
Why do you love child molesters?
Why do you hate black people?
Why do you hate women, children and puppies?
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:45 pm to Vols&Shaft83
You just don't understand it. Got it.
Posted on 1/21/16 at 7:46 pm to mizzoubuckeyeiowa
quote:
Whatever you feel about this issue, supporting the conviction of Avery because he simply owned a gun is preposterous.
So, let me get this straight. He was charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm. There were two rifles in his home. He invited the cops to search his home. His name was actually on the stock of one of the guns. Is he not guilty of being a felon in possession of a gun? Please answer this question. That was one of the two charges he was convicted of. So, how is that preposterous?
Also, his first 3 felonies. Breaking and entering into a bar, cruelty to an animal and endangering the safety of another person. The last is a definite felony, as he was sentenced to 6 years. Also, when he was arrested for the assault, part of the charges were that he was a felon in possession of a firearm. So, he had been down that road before.
You going to keep fighting for him?
Popular
Back to top


0







