- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/29/12 at 4:27 pm to Rittdog
quote:
Can this actually be better than TDKR?
No way in hell Avengers is better than any of the Nolan directed movies.
However, it's going to be badass to see the Avengers all together on the big screen.
Marvel was smart to release this movie more than two months ahead of TDKR.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 6:06 pm to schexyoung
Once again...little pistol gonna do work.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 6:37 pm to schexyoung
I just got a huge nerd boner.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 6:44 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
How can Hulk fight on a team when Hulk is Hulk?
Posted on 2/29/12 at 6:45 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
My only wish is that they figure out some way to make hulk non cgi
Posted on 2/29/12 at 6:45 pm to jojothetireguy
At how many times boner was used in this thread!
Posted on 2/29/12 at 7:12 pm to Vood
quote:
I just don't know about this one. It is going to be too little of everyone in my opinion.
In Whedon we trust.
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:10 pm to Ibleedblackandgold
I've never said this before for a trailer, but...
:boner:
:boner:
Posted on 2/29/12 at 9:21 pm to Freauxzen
As long as it doesn't feel rushed I think it should be a decent flick like all the previous Marvel movies, Thor, Captain America, Iron man, etc. Their acting isn't great but it's better than some other movies. Plus this a popcorn flick, not really trying to tell a story other than the main guys blowing shite up unlike TDKR
Posted on 3/1/12 at 1:01 am to KingwoodLsuFan
quote:
I'm afraid everything is going to feel rushed though. A lot of characters to fill in and I don't think they are willing to do a 3 hr + movie.
Which is how i felt about spiderman 3.
Posted on 3/1/12 at 1:07 am to Ibleedblackandgold
That looks badass. Marvel has done a good job with casting.
The chick looks like a waste of space though. Loki is a good villain for this movie. Being a god and all. Finding good villains was always the problem with Superman IMO.
The chick looks like a waste of space though. Loki is a good villain for this movie. Being a god and all. Finding good villains was always the problem with Superman IMO.
Posted on 3/1/12 at 1:20 am to biglego
quote:
I'm afraid everything is going to feel rushed though. A lot of characters to fill in and I don't think they are willing to do a 3 hr + movie.
Which I always say is unfortunate. If there is a damn good story, I can easily sit through a 3+ hour movie and I feel like many people are the same. LOTR were all long, but fricking awesome.
To really do The Avengers justice it needs to at least be 2 hours, 15 minutes or so imo.
quote:
Finding good villains was always the problem with Superman IMO.
Off topic but I don't think this is the case. They just overused Luthor. I'm looking forward to The Man of Steel but would rather see a true version of Brainiac than Zod.
This post was edited on 3/1/12 at 1:21 am
Posted on 3/1/12 at 1:51 am to Starchild
quote:
f topic but I don't think this is the case. They just overused Luthor. I'm looking forward to The Man of Steel but would rather see a true version of Brainiac than Zod
luthor just seems to lame to be fighting superman. He's a bumbling mastermind obsessed with killing Supes with kryptonite. You're right, overused.
Any Superman sequels should have some physicaly formidable enemy.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News