Started By
Message
locked post

Midnight in Paris

Posted on 7/8/11 at 12:50 pm
Posted by John Merlyn
Member since Oct 2009
2203 posts
Posted on 7/8/11 at 12:50 pm
Thought it was excellent and Owen Wilson was great. Cool movie in general.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13633 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 5:49 pm to
Its truly showing of the quality of this board that there is only one mention of Midnight in Paris while there are hundreds of mentions of stupid television shows and movies like Harry Potter.

The best way to see a movie is to know nothing at all about it before you enter. And that's how I approached this movie. I hadn't seen a single trailer, read a review, or even seen a movie poster. As soon as I sat down to the pleasant intro scene of the mundane snapshots of Paris life I knew I was in a movie worth seeing.

When Owen Wilson came on screen I had mixed feelings. He is a fuzzy, warm character who plays the same character in every movie that you can't help but to like, but is he the sort of character for an artsy movie? The more I watched, the more I felt I was Owen's character. He connected with at least one viewer.

Rachel McAdams is the anti-Woman: the woman every man should fear and hate, yet many men desire. You should grow to loathe such a woman, and, if you're like me, you will see many women in her. So sad that so many young girls aspire to be like McAdams' character.

The movie is a bit Field of Dreams, a bit Bill & Ted's Excellent Adventure, a bit Dead Poets Society. The cheesy parts don't ruin the movie, but they don't strengthen it either. To make up for the ignorance of many viewers, the writer thought it necessary for some of the characters to introduce themselves through a sort of encyclopedic monologue device. It's helpful if you are uneducated; annoying if you know the characters already.

I absolutely love the cinematography. The lighting and scenes are phenomenal. The acting is surprisingly high brow. The dialogue, particularly Hemmingway's is good and at times hilarious. At the end of the day, this movie succeeds in being a modern morality tale about living in the eternal now.

8/10
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
62446 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

The more I watched, the more I felt I was Owen's character.


I'm positive you're more like the pedantic a-hole.
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13633 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 5:56 pm to
Certainly not. If I wanted to impress you with my knowledge, I would.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

The best way to see a movie is to know nothing at all about it before you enter.



Too late I already know it's a Woody Allen movie. Thus my disinterest.
Posted by beachdude
FL
Member since Nov 2008
6471 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:00 pm to
I have not been to a feature film twice on its first run in decades until Midnight in Paris. It is an excellent film in all respects. I am not an Owen Wilson fan, but he is very good and convincing in this movie. I've had a copy of A Moveable Feast sitting around my book piles for years and picked it up to read as a result of viewing this film. I would highly recommend it.
Posted by Superior Pariah
Member since Jun 2009
8457 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

Its truly showing of the quality of this board that there is only one mention of Midnight in Paris


Woody Allen sucks for the most part

quote:

while there are hundreds of mentions of stupid movies like Harry Potter.


Brah, Harry Potter is legit

Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13633 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:03 pm to
Woody doesn't have anything on Michael Bay or Christopher Nolan
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:09 pm to
Woody has about 1 good movie for every 5 bad ones.

But when he's good, he's good. Manhattan, Hannah and Her Sisters, Crimes and Misdemeanors, and even recently with Mathpoint, are all good dramas.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

Woody doesn't have anything on Michael Bay or Christopher Nolan



I'm not sure I get the comparison I'm just not into Woody Allen movies. I've never seen one Harry Potter movie either.

I'm just saying for my part anyway that's why there's been no talk on the board of this movie from me.
In reference to:
quote:

Its truly showing of the quality of this board that there is only one mention of Midnight in Paris
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 6:13 pm
Posted by TulaneLSU
Member since Aug 2003
Member since Dec 2007
13633 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:18 pm to
It's all good. I mean, you might not like Allen, but for the entire board, except one, to ignore this movie like it has is pretty telling.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

It's all good. I mean, you might not like Allen, but for the entire board, except one, to ignore this movie like it has is pretty telling.



You're probably right don't listen to me. I doubt most people even know it's a Woody movie so I have no clue why nobody is talking about it.

I did hear Dennis Miller and a guest he had on his radio show raving about this movie the other day. That's pretty much the only buzz I've heard of it.

A lot of movies fly under the radar.
This post was edited on 7/18/11 at 6:24 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:25 pm to
Why are people suddenly talking about this movie? I saw it years ago and personally I thought it was overrated. All it was was a stupid spoiled whore and a steroid pumping frickhead going after it. And her lazy eye and her ridiculously annoying voice made me want to switch it to something else.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:27 pm to
quote:

Why are people suddenly talking about this movie? I saw it years ago and personally I thought it was overrated.



I thought it just came out?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:30 pm to
quote:

I thought it just came out?



I'm pretty sure it came out in the mid-2000s. I thought everyone had seen at least some portions of it. Watched it with a hooker a few years ago and we found it just awful for getting off on.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure it came out in the mid-2000s.



Are you?
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

Are you?



I'm pretty sure. Its the one where Paris Hilton starts swallowing cock like its her damn job right?
Posted by Leauxgan
Brooklyn
Member since Nov 2005
17324 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:35 pm to
It only came out around 4 months ago.

For the record there have been at least 3 or 4 other threads on this movie.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I'm pretty sure. Its the one where Paris Hilton starts swallowing cock like its her damn job right?


Ohhh.....


I'm slow on the uptake today.
Posted by Lakebound
Member since Nov 2004
3988 posts
Posted on 7/18/11 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

For the record there have been at least 3 or 4 other threads on this movie.


here's one of them...........
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram