Started By
Message

re: Masters of the Universe discussion | Rotten Tomatoes 75%

Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:40 pm to
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64402 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand why people dont wait til they see it to start debating how good it is gonna be. I probably wont see it in theaters but am looking forward to watching when it hits streaming.


Why do people have to pay money? Movie studios already burned that trust. Nobody should have to pay money anymore to see a movie that is written in hatred of a good chunk of its audience.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27400 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 5:45 pm to
I'm not saying you have to spend money, I'm saying you should watch a movie before you form an opinion so you aren't just trying to defend what you said before you saw it.

if you don't wanna pay money, dont. but then don't act like you know what you are talking about when discussing the movie.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24364 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 6:11 pm to
quote:

don't act like you know what you are talking about when discussing the movie.

You don't have to pay to see a movie if the complaints about that movie are widespread and universally agreed upon. Mando was for kids and it had no overarching story, that's pretty much agreed on whatever review or youtube review you look at from across the spectrum.

And, even if there is something bothersome politically and I paid to go see it, you'll never admit it and claim it doesn't say that anyway.

Not sure why you're discussing this movie when you aren't going to see it. see what I did there?
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27400 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

Not sure why you're discussing this movie when you aren't going to see it. see what I did there?

No, because i have not said anything about this movie other than ill wait and see it when it comes to streaming
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

I just don't understand why people dont wait til they see it to start debating how good it is gonna be.
Wait. . .what?

People shouldn't talk about film quality until they have seen it?

So if a review drops, or a casting decision, director hired, composer chosen, or plot leaks. . .you are wondering why can't people ignore all of that and only discuss after they have seen it? No judgements until they have seen the film?

That's. . .I mean. . .yeah. . .
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27400 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 9:21 pm to
quote:

So if a review drops

You absolutely shouldn't base your opinion of a movie off someone elses review....
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/2/26 at 11:00 pm to
quote:

You absolutely shouldn't base your opinion of a movie off someone elses review....
Entirely, no.

If a friend, who has similar tastes to your own and has yet to lead you astray, tells you that he loved or hated a movie. . .you telling me that doesn't color your opinion of the movie?

Because that means either you have no friends, or you are lying.

What you are suggesting effectively ends discussion of movies before they are released. . .

Leslie Jones and Chris Klein are hired to play the leads in a remake of Pretty Woman, directed by Uwe Bol, with score comprised entirely of Mongolian throat singing, and it leaks that all the dialogue will be in Pig Latin? Can't have an opinion. . .guess I will have to shell out 50 bucks before I can tell you I wasted my money?

Maybe you are just doing a bit, because that entire line of reasoning is completely ridiculous

You cats need to think about these arguments before you just throw out shite to "own the chuds/anti-wokes/{insert whatever group you want to feel bad for not liking a film}
This post was edited on 6/2/26 at 11:05 pm
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5270 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Has a GOTG-style, self-aware tone & a radical message at its core.


Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27400 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 4:52 am to
quote:

Leslie Jones and Chris Klein are hired to play the leads in a remake of Pretty Woman, directed by Uwe Bol, with score comprised entirely of Mongolian throat singing, and it leaks that all the dialogue will be in Pig Latin? Can't have an opinion. . .guess I will have to shell out 50 bucks before I can tell you I wasted my money?


I would just choose not to watch it. It would be weirder to go around talking like i had seen the movie by calling it good or bad. I haven't seen the new Mortal Kombat, or Super Mario Galaxy, or the bone temple. You dont see me in any of those threads talking about how good or bad the movie is.

Im pretty sure i wouldn't enjoy the Michael Jackson movie, but i can't comment on its quality or lack thereof without seeing it and i dont plan on seeing it.

You dont have to have an opinion on everything, especially if you are just gonna regurgitate someone else's.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 4:57 am
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24364 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 5:00 am to
quote:

it. It would be weirder to go around talking like i had seen the movie by calling it good or bad

What you’re referring to is when I posted the Mando reactions, prior to the movie’s release, where many said it’s a kids movie that doesn’t have a plot. ONLY critics saw it at the time so nobody here could talk about the movie is your position?

Turns out the complaints were true. We don’t need to see that movie to talk about what every critic is saying.

As for He-Man, everyone seems to be liking it so I’m looking forward to it. And it’s not Disney so that’s a plus
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
27400 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:16 am to
quote:

Turns out the complaints were true.

quote:

movie that doesn’t have a plot

No, turns out they weren't.

Perfect example of how you can't have a valid opinion on something you havent seen.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 6:36 am
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
24364 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 1:43 pm to


Early release tonight, anyone else going?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70626 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

I haven't seen the new Mortal Kombat, or Super Mario Galaxy, or the bone temple. You dont see me in any of those threads talking about how good or bad the movie is.


I don’t understand why more people on this board aren’t like this. If I haven’t seen a movie and don’t want to see it because it looks bad, I’ll just maybe say that in a thread about the trailer and then ignore future threads about it. I’m not going to argue with people who did see it and enjoyed it to try and convince them that it sucks. Like, what is even the point of that?

Also, MK2 was awesome dumb fun. If you liked the games, it’s literally everything you could ever want from a MK movie. Granted, this board might not trust my judgement because I bought a ticket to see “The Mandalorian & Grogu” and enjoyed it FOR ITS PLOT.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I would just choose not to watch it.
What if it is an IP you really care about, invested a great deal of your childhood into, and thousands of dollars?

Just say nothing?

quote:

You dont have to have an opinion on everything
Sure. But you should have opinions on whatever is important to you. No?

quote:

You dont see me in any of those threads talking about how good or bad the movie is.
Because the things aren't very important to you. Plus you seem to have a problem with people having negative opinions on movies.

Where does your philosophy jibe when people are excited for an upcoming movie, or about casting news, director hires, plot leaks, etc? No talking about it until it comes out?

You may want to refine this point more, it isn't quite there yet.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:38 pm to
Wife wants to go see Backrooms again Saturday

After all the early reviews, going to see this on Sunday, probably
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

If I haven’t seen a movie and don’t want to see it because it looks bad, I’ll just maybe say that in a thread about the trailer and then ignore future threads about it.
I am the same way, unless the IP is important to me

Most people on this board are that way.

What gets all the engagement? IPs with hardcore adult fanbases or nostalgia bait IPs.
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 6:54 pm to
Jahns and Gore both said the best way to view the film is not as an "Action-Comedy", but as a straight up comedy, with a little action
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70626 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:29 pm to
quote:

What if it is an IP you really care about, invested a great deal of your childhood into, and thousands of dollars?


I’m going to say “hey, that looks really dumb, I’m not gonna pay to see that in theaters.” Then watch it for free at some point after it’s on streaming/video and maybe post about it once I have an actual opinion on the movie.

I’m not going to argue with people who did see a movie about its quality if I didn’t see it.

quote:

But you should have opinions on whatever is important to you.


I have opinions on everything, but I keep them to myself unless it’s relevant to the discussion at hand and I have knowledge relevant to the discussion. If I didn’t see a movie, I am not going to tell people who did see it how much it sucks. I’m just going to ask them what they liked about it, so when I eventually watch it, I can make up my own mind.

quote:

Because the things aren't very important to you.


It’s a movie, man. It’s worth the time and money I spend to watch it vs how else that time/money could have been spent. It’s not my identity, it’s not a political decision that has consequences for my way of life, it’s not a sports team that has relevance for the mood of the town I live in, it’s a movie.

quote:

Plus you seem to have a problem with people having negative opinions on movies.


I have no issues with negative opinions by people who actually saw the movie at issue. The people who didn’t see it seem to be the ones complaining on this board. Almost every poster who watched The Mandalorian & Grogu left a positive review. They weren’t calling it a 10/10 instant classic, but they by and large enjoyed it. The negative opinions were people who hadn’t seen the movie quoting reviews from youtubers.

quote:

Where does your philosophy jibe when people are excited for an upcoming movie, or about casting news, director hires, plot leaks, etc? No talking about it until it comes out?


You talk about expectations and anticipation in threads about the trailers. In review threads, you can share reviews from others or ask questions but refrain from debating others’ opinions when they are reviewing a movie they watched if you didn’t. You can’t review a movie you haven’t seen. You can review a trailer if you’ve seen that, so review the trailers in the trailer threads not the movie in the review threads.

This shitte ain’t rocket science!

For example: this Masters of the Universe movie looks like it might be good. The reviews are somewhat promising. I might go see it if more people I know say they liked it. If someone says it sucks, I might ask them why, but I am not going to tell them they’re wrong. Why? BECAUSE I HAVE NOT SEEN THIS MOVIE!!!
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 7:36 pm
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84339 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

I’m going to say “hey, that looks really dumb, I’m not gonna pay to see that in theaters.” Then watch it for free at some point after it’s on streaming/video and maybe post about it once I have an actual opinion on the movie.

I’m not going to argue with people who did see a movie about its quality if I didn’t see it.
Because you aren't very passionate about the IP

Some people really care about things like this. They are important to them.

I understand that is beyond you, but there are so many people who understand this fully

quote:

It’s a movie, man.
Exactly, you don't understand passionate fans

And that is OK

Takes all kinds



quote:

I have no issues with negative opinions
This isn't directed at you, or in reply to you. I don't know anything about your prior opinions on things.

quote:

You talk about expectations and anticipation in threads about the trailers. In review threads, you can share reviews from others or ask questions but refrain from debating others’ opinions when they are reviewing a movie they watched if you didn’t.
Or you ask questions about the movie or react to others' reviews

Some of those reactions are negative, and that is OK

Some are still trying to decide to see the movie. . .or maybe there was a controversy they are concerned about. . .or any number of other things.

This just reeks of "I am not ready for the internet"
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 7:49 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70626 posts
Posted on 6/3/26 at 8:12 pm to
quote:

Because you aren't very passionate about the IP


Even if I saw every Star Wars movie and tv show, played with the action figures, built a bunch of the lego sets, played a lot of the video games, read a bunch of the eu, grew up playing with lightsabers in the yard, dressed up as Darth Vader for Halloween, can quote Spaceballs and Fanboys religiously, at the end of the day, it’s still a movie. My expectations are that it will entertain me while I watch it. I would love every Star Wars movie to be a 10/10 masterpiece, but that ain’t been the case since 1997.

It sucks that 2/3 of the prequels were mid-bad movies, and that the one good one is really only so bad it’s good. It sucks that the tv shows are of inconsistent quality. It sucks that Disney decanonized the EU and then made a sequel trilogy with no plan which completely ruined pre-existing characters. It sucks that the best Star Wars we’ve gotten since 1983 is a prestige spy drama prequel to a movie where every character dies. It sucks that Disney has overseen such inconsistent quality that I cannot trust a Star Wars release to be good by default.

However, when a Star Wars movie gets made, if it’s bad, it’s not gonna ruin my life. If it’s good, it’s a good day. If it’s mid, it’s a mid day. If I want to see it, I will, but if I am afraid it will suck, I’ll wait until it’s out on streaming or rent it from the library. If reviews seem positive, I’ll see it in the theater.

I’m not going to make my mind up and tell others how they should think about a movie if I haven’t seen it. That’s just not logical behavior no matter how much I care about an IP.
This post was edited on 6/3/26 at 8:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram