- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Marvel Is Rebranding Its Television and animation Shows to help with audience confusion
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:37 pm
LINK
![](https://i.postimg.cc/G2Gwtk19/20240521-124026.jpg)
quote:
The rebrands are meant to help Marvel disabuse audiences from the pervasive impression that its content is one unified narrative experience that must be consumed in its totality.
“There was a lot of pressure post-‘Avengers: Endgame’ on the public to feel obligated to watch absolutely everything in order to watch anything,” says Brad Winderbaum, Marvel’s head of streaming, television and animation. “Part of the rebranding was a signal to the general audience that we’re creating a lot of options, and you can follow your tastes within this brand. Some will be more comedic, some will be more dramatic, some will be animated, some will be live-action. Marvel is more than just one thing — it is actually many different genres that just happened to coexist in a single narrative.”
When Marvel Studios first launched into streaming, Feige made a point to note that the shows were part of the Marvel Cinematic Universe and their storylines would be integrated with the feature films. The events of 2021’s “WandaVision” carried over into 2022’s “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” and 2023’s “The Marvels,” for example, while the first season of “Loki” in 2021 fed into “Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania” in 2023, which in turn led into the events of “Loki” Season 2 later that year.
Moving forward, however, Marvel intends to de-emphasize those connections, as some audiences have come to see the 46 titles that currently make up the MCU as a barrier of entry.
“The characters still live and breathe in the same universe, but the interconnectivity is not so rigid that you need to watch Project A to understand Project B,” Winderbaum says. “The hope is that, like the comics, you can just pop in anywhere and have a satisfying experience. We’re trying to dispel the idea that you need to do any kind of setup work to watch anything else.”
![](https://i.postimg.cc/G2Gwtk19/20240521-124026.jpg)
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 2:41 pm
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:42 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
“There was a lot of pressure post-‘Avengers: Endgame’ on the public to feel obligated to watch absolutely everything in order to watch anything,” says Brad Winderbaum, Marvel’s head of streaming, television and animation. “Part of the rebranding was a signal to the general audience that we’re creating a lot of options, and you can follow your tastes within this brand. Some will be more comedic, some will be more dramatic, some will be animated, some will be live-action. Marvel is more than just one thing — it is actually many different genres that just happened to coexist in a single narrative.”
For some, Endgame was an appropriate finale to all things Marvel.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:50 pm to BugAC
quote:
For some, Endgame was an appropriate finale to all things Marvel.
Thanks for the fresh take. Never heard this once before.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 2:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
This is great to read, because I barely have time to watch the movies, much less a TV series.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:21 pm to RLDSC FAN
interesting
if you’re going to make everyone watch every movie and show, then you probably need to make them all general audience pleasers.
If you want to experiment and go with a “something for everyone” approach then let them be their own things.
if you’re going to make everyone watch every movie and show, then you probably need to make them all general audience pleasers.
If you want to experiment and go with a “something for everyone” approach then let them be their own things.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:28 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
The rebrands are meant to help Marvel disabuse audiences from the pervasive impression that its content is one unified narrative experience that must be consumed in its totality.
That was literally the angle. That wasn’t the impression….that was the pitch when it got started. That it was all one big interwoven narrative.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:35 pm to RLDSC FAN
call it like it is. you publicly announced it's all connected so people would watch. No intention to connect and shoved DEI down our throats
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:43 pm to hirematthouse
quote:
No intention to connect and shoved DEI down our throats
Not yours because there’s alway a dick in there. BING BONG
Posted on 5/21/24 at 3:59 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:
There was a lot of pressure post-‘Avengers: Endgame’ on the public to feel obligated to watch absolutely everything in order to watch anything,” says Brad Winderbaum, Marvel’s head
Yep. Then you fall behind and can’t catch up and just give up on it all.
That’s where I fall.
As an example that’s not accurate but this what it feels like to see the internet discourse on some of this..
To understand a throwaway line in antman quantamania I need to see episode 3 of she hulk which is a spin off for What if and then Loki season 2 wraps it all up and blah blah blah
I start to glaze over and I lose interest
This post was edited on 5/21/24 at 4:01 pm
Posted on 5/21/24 at 5:56 pm to RLDSC FAN
quote:It is a big issue. Glad they are addressing it.
feel obligated to watch absolutely everything in order to watch anything
The other 3 are:
-DEI/Woke prioritization, or at least the public perception of same
-God awful writing/direction (hiring for reasons other than talent and resume')
-Stupid story decisions (nobody gives a pebble of a shite about Falcon/Captain Marvel/Ant-man/Ironheart/Girl Panther. . .nobody)
Posted on 5/21/24 at 7:59 pm to Roaad
Hey now the first two AntMan movies were very good.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:06 pm to Dairy Sanders
quote:The first one was passably fine.
Hey now the first two AntMan movies were very good.
Ant Man and the Wasp was dogshit.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:07 pm to Roaad
Sounds like your tastes are shite but you do you.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:14 pm to Dairy Sanders
Watched it twice, and all I can remember is maybe Michelle Pfeiffer was in it?
It was a movie I trudged through.
You liked it, great!
K, frick off.
It was a movie I trudged through.
You liked it, great!
quote:So it's like that?
Sounds like your tastes are shite
K, frick off.
Posted on 5/21/24 at 8:42 pm to hirematthouse
quote:
you publicly announced it's all connected so people would watch. No intention to connect and shoved DEI down our throats
What?
It was all connected, just like they said it would be, and it became too much homework for everyone. You missed or ignored a point just so you could make a nonsensical one.
Posted on 5/22/24 at 1:59 pm to BugAC
quote:
For some, Endgame was an appropriate finale to all things Marvel.
Which is pretty silly considering a large chunk of Marvel’s best characters didn’t make an appearance during the Infinity Saga.
Give these unused characters coherent storytelling + writers who understand them (and keep them semi close to the source material), and I still believe they could create something better than the Infinity Saga imo
Posted on 5/22/24 at 3:21 pm to David Ricky
quote:
Which is pretty silly considering a large chunk of Marvel’s best characters didn’t make an appearance during the Infinity Saga.
Yeah, i really missed out on she-hulk, Lady Hawkeye, Eternals, The Marvels....
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 5/22/24 at 3:26 pm to BugAC
I think he means characters like the X-Men and Fantastic Four
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)