Started By
Message

is there a worse abomination of a movie then "cowboys vs aliens"?

Posted on 2/12/18 at 8:52 pm
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30018 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 8:52 pm
it was on the TV today and every time i watch it i am amazed that you can tell they were trying to make a serious movie here and yet is so bad its laughable.

i watch it for laughs if there is absolutely nothing else on but it was straight up intended to be a serious movie
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 8:54 pm
Posted by Tactical1
Denham Springs
Member since May 2010
27104 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:00 pm to
Yeah, it's called Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 9:01 pm
Posted by craigbiggio
Member since Dec 2009
31805 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:01 pm to
quote:

Batman V Superman
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99005 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:03 pm to
The Last Airbender

Skyline
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 9:04 pm
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:05 pm to
Batman v Superman
The Last Jedi
DragonBall: Evolution
A.I.
Ironman 3
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108398 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:07 pm to
“Cowboys vs Aliens” is schlock. I watched it drunk once, but I somewhat enjoyed myself mocking the movie. It’s a silly concept which makes it kind of fun. If it classifies as this, it’s not the worst movie. True irredeemable disasters have none of this going on and spit in the face of the audience. As mentioned BvS and TLA are far, far worse.
Posted by Dr RC
The Money Pit
Member since Aug 2011
58071 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:17 pm to
Go watch Alien vs Zombies on Hulu if you want to see a truly horrid alien movie. Even for a low budget direct to video effort the film is laughably bad. Late night Cinemax softcore porn has higher production values, better acting, and better special effects. AvZ has terrible lighting, terrible acting, terrible plot, terrible special effects and a writer/producer/director who has worked as a location scout for most of his career. It's simultaneously one of the worst zombie and worst alien movies ever made.

After you suffer through that, try another crapfest on Hulu called The Lodge. This movie would be bad even by student film standards. Somehow, someway, nearly all of the movie was shot out of focus. At first I thought may it was some kind of weird artistic choice but every so often a shot is in focus which means nobody from the director, to the DPA, to the camera op, to the 1st camera assistant (if they even had one) didn't know how to use the camera. Toss in some terrible acting, awful script, and piss poor editing and you get a movie so terrible that it makes trash like the Evil Bong series look Kubrick level by comparison.
Posted by ElectricWizard0
Member since Jul 2017
2702 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:20 pm to
The hobbit parts 1, 2, and 3. Tolkien is rolling in his grave
Posted by weagle99
Member since Nov 2011
35893 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:29 pm to
I thought it was entertaining.

Have you ever seen Dirty Dancing: Havana Nights?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76309 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:46 pm to
Wolfman
Indiana Jones Crystal Skull
The last Die Hard
Legion
Independence Day 2
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108398 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

The hobbit parts 1, 2, and 3. Tolkien is rolling in his grave



This doesn’t qualify. I’ve seen the single cut, and it is fricking amazing. It’s 3 and a half hours with all 3 movies edited to be the same length as “Return of the King”. The studio forced Jackson to make this into 3 movies, and since Del Toro dropped out, it would have been a garbage fire if almost anyone else had done it.

He had less than a year to write 3 movies and get all the logistics set up to shoot within the year. For “The Lord of the Rings” he had 4 years, which barely got done in time. So the scenes that Jackson didn’t give a frick about he wrote in one draft and then focused his time on the scenes he knew he couldn’t frick up. He doesn’t frick up on any of them. An Unexpected Party, the troll scene, Riddles in Dark, the spiders of Mirkwood, Bilbo meeting Smaug, Smaug’s death, and Thorin’s death were all perfectly rendered onto the screen.

So with good and quite frankly easy editing, you’ve got a damn fine film which can hold up to the standards set by The Lord of the Rings. Yeah the set design and costumes are no where near as good as the first, but I’m incredibly sympathetic to Jackson here given the task and the studios being incompetent as frick. There’s really nothing save for the podrace or the Duel of the Fates that you can salvage from the first two prequels, and those two scenes I mentioned are rendered pointless by the end.

The Hobbit was overly long drivel, but it gave the fans something wonderful to work with and give us a definitive Hobbit film, and it flows pretty gloriously. The only part that took me out of the fan edited movie is when Smaug busts out of the Lonely Mountain covered in gold, but other than that the fan edit is flawless, and I think this is intentional by Jackson. So I have to say “Thank you Peter Jackson for the Hobbit.”
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65088 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:48 pm to
I can't think of a more disappointing movie from this decade. That film had everything going for it. A fun and goofy premise, Harrison Ford and Daniel Craig, as well as Jon Favreau in the director's chair. Had it been 50s sci-fi camp set in the Old West it would have worked. But the film took its premise way too seriously....and that was its ultimate downfall.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 9:50 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108398 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

I can't think of a more disappointing movie from this decade.


Then I suggest you read more or watch more television. I really haven’t thought of this movie in quite a few years.

If you want something that should have been gloriously schlock, “Sucker Punch” was far more disappointing. Really, it had just about everything I look for in a film: smoking hot chicks in skimpy skirts, samurai, insane asylums, cyborgs, Nazi zombies, dragons, steampunk, cyberpunk, lobotomies, Oscar Issac... and I still didn’t like it. You fricked up hardcore if I find myself not liking that movie.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 9:56 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65088 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:10 pm to
quote:

“Sucker Punch” was far more disappointing


Not to me.

I had a low opinion of Zack Snyder as a filmmaker before that film was even released. I thought Dawn of the Dead and 300 (especially on second viewing) were both meh and I really found myself not liking the theatrical cut of Watchmen. So you can imagine how un-surprised I was when I walked out of Sucker Punch not liking it.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
108398 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:13 pm to
quote:

I had a low opinion of Zack Snyder as a filmmaker before that film was even released. I thought Dawn of the Dead and 300 (especially on second viewing) were both meh and I really found myself not liking the theatrical cut of Watchmen. So you can imagine how un-surprised I was when I walked out of Sucker Punch not liking it.



That’s fair enough from your personal perspective, but I did find myself liking Watchmen and 300, being just ok Dawn of the Dead. I really should have realized earlier on with his filmography and especially Sucker Punch that Man of Steel was going to be a piece of shite. Up until The Last Jedi, Man of Steel was bar none the most disappointing experience ever, which was presided by another highly disappointing film from his filmography.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65088 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:19 pm to
As soon as Man of Steel was announced, I was freaking excited. Christopher Nolan writing and producing a Superman movie?! What could go wrong? And then it was announced that Snyder would be directing it, and my excitement for the project went from a 10/10 to a 6/10 right then and there.

Funny thing is, I ended up actually liking the movie. Perhaps it's because of how low I had set the bar for the project once Snyder came on board.
This post was edited on 2/12/18 at 10:20 pm
Posted by lsusportsman2
Member since Oct 2007
27232 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 10:29 pm to
Suicide Squad is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY worse.
Posted by arkyhawk
SWMO
Member since Jan 2013
8116 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 11:05 pm to
Saw The 15:17 to Paris last night and it was easily the worst movie I've ever seen.




So...yes.
Posted by hogNsinceReagan
Fayetteville, Ar
Member since Feb 2015
5879 posts
Posted on 2/12/18 at 11:41 pm to
In the Name of the King
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76309 posts
Posted on 2/13/18 at 12:24 am to
Yes Suicide Squad was awful.

I don’t even ever think about Cowboys and Aliens.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram