Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

If the IMAX 1.43:1 ratio were to ever be adopted by the TV companies, would you buy one?

Posted on 8/14/23 at 10:27 am
Posted by finchmeister08
Member since Mar 2011
35612 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 10:27 am
we would've come full circle if that happens...


Posted by ellunchboxo
Gtown
Member since Feb 2009
18789 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 10:30 am to
No.
Posted by Chadaristic
Member since Jan 2011
40820 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 11:04 am to
How much would they cost?
Posted by Jack Ruby
Member since Apr 2014
22745 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 11:11 am to
Anything with IMAX name on it would automatically have about a 200% markup.

They'd probably partner with some really high end TV manufacturer and charge $5000 for a 55" TV and you'd basically only bea able to watch Chris Nolan movies on it to get the actual full effect.

It would be a collosal waste of money.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89506 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 11:12 am to
I mean, I'm used to HD/4k/8k widescreen now, so no, not unless it became a pain not to.

I would maybe kit my cinema out for it, but that's a "down the line" decision.
Posted by paperwasp
11x HRV tRant Poster of the Week
Member since Sep 2014
23095 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 11:14 am to
As I understand it, movies were filmed in widescreen originally because it's more immersive within your field of vision.

In your example, the horizontal width appears to be the same, while the vertical has been stretched.

I can't really see a downside to this, since in effect you're just adding more information to the screen (hence we're seeing more of his face).

Now if you shrunk the screen to get that ratio, sure. But keeping the same width (periphery) and adding height seems pretty cool, IMO.
Posted by bad93ex
Member since Sep 2018
27103 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

we would've come full circle if that happens...



No doubt in my mind that they will attempt this and there will be quite a few people that will pick one up.
Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4314 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

If the IMAX 1.43:1 ratio were to ever be adopted by the TV companies, would you buy one?



There would have to be more 1.43:1 content available. Zach Snyder's Justice League is the only thing I can think of available for at home viewing in that aspect ratio right now.

Nolan is basically the only director currently filming in that aspect ratio. So I don't see how this would ever be a thing.

There have been attempts at selling 2.35:1 aspect ratio TV's but they obviously never sold very well.

Posted by Northshore Aggie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Sep 2022
4640 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

As I understand it, movies were filmed in widescreen originally because it's more immersive within your field of vision. In your example, the horizontal width appears to be the same, while the vertical has been stretched. I can't really see a downside to this, since in effect you're just adding more information to the screen (hence we're seeing more of his face). Now if you shrunk the screen to get that ratio, sure. But keeping the same width (periphery) and adding height seems pretty cool, IMO.

pretty much this. the problem with the old 4:3 tv's wasnt the shape, per se, it was the fact that virtually every movie had to be formatted into pan and scan which sucked.
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 1:54 pm
Posted by Northshore Aggie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Sep 2022
4640 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

we would've come full circle if that happens...

or full rectangle.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35472 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

formatted into pan and scan which sucked.


What are you talking about? Pan and Scan was awesome.

Shite happening off screen often could add to a weak storyline and made you activate your imagination.

Who's saying this dialogue? Let me ponder the possibilities.
Posted by Northshore Aggie
Mandeville, LA
Member since Sep 2022
4640 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 2:04 pm to
lol ok fair - it did add a dimension of unreality to scenes and movies that were otherwise mundane.
Posted by chinese58
NELA. after 30 years in Dallas.
Member since Jun 2004
30382 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 3:55 pm to
No.

That would be like going back to an old box-shaped TV. Who thinks that configuration is better?

I couldn't watch some of the best movies out there the way the film makers wanted. Screw whoever started making movies that way.

Films I think need to be seen in a widescreen aspect:

30"s
Gone with the Wind
The Wizard of OZ
The Private Lives of Elizabeth and Essex
The Big Trail

40's
Casablanca
How Green Was My Valley
The Shepherd of the Hills

50's
Ben Hur
The Ten Commandments
The Searchers
Seven Samurai
North by Northwest
Demetrius and the Gladiators
The Egyptian
Frankenstein
Land of the Pharohs
Rear Window
Strangers on a Train

60's
Lawrence of Arabia
The Bridge On The River Kwai
2001
Cool Hand Luke
The Longest Day
Once Upon a Time in the West
The Greatest Story Ever Told
Full Metal Jacket
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
The Wild Bunch
The Man Who Knew Too Much
In Cold Blood
To Catch a Thief
Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid
Doctor Zhivago
Planet of the Apes
The Great Escape
The Magnificent Seven
Spartacus
It's a Mad, Mad, Mad Mad World
Bonnie & Clyde
The Dirty Dozen
Cleopatra
Easy Rider

70's
Star Wars
Close Encounters
Apocalypse Now
Alien
Rocky (all of them)
Chinatown
The Elephant Man
The Deer Hunter
Superman
Days of Heaven
The Last Picture Show
Patton
McCabe & Mrs. Miller
The Godfather Trilogy
Live and Let Die
Mad Max
Deliverance
The Outlaw Josey Wales
The French Connection I & II
The Omen
Paper Moon
Little Big Man
The Man Who Would be King
Papillon
Barry Lyndon

80's
Predator
Empire of the Sun
The Last Emperor
Glory
Platoon
Lonesome Dove
The Color Purple
Hoosiers
Das Boot
Raging Bull
48 Hrs.
An American Werewolf in London
Back to the Future
The Natural
Ghostbusters
Raising Arizona
2010
Lethal Weapon
Cocoon

90's
Matrix trilogy
Jurassic Park
Starship Troopers
Interview with the Vampire
The Lion King
The Last of the Mohicans
Jurassic Park
A River Runs Through It
The Mask
Goodfellas
Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)
Edward Scissorhands
Miller's Crossing
Legends of the Fall
The Big Lebowski
Eyes Wide Shut
The Pacific

2000's
Apocalypto
Gladiator
Firefly series
Bad Lieutenant: Port of Call New Orleans
Band of Brothers
Sin City
The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest
The Girl Who Played with Fire
Rescue Dawn
Monsters, Inc.
Avatar
Batman movies since 1989
Children of Men
Cloverfield
Destrict 9
Big Fish
AI
Army of Darkness

2010's
Interstellar
Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol
Mission: Impossible - Fallout
Dunkirk
Darkest Hour

I imagine I'm leaving a bunch off, but I think this makes my point.
This post was edited on 8/14/23 at 6:02 pm
Posted by SonicAndBareKnuckles
Member since Jun 2018
1596 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 4:08 pm to
Y'all better get your media set up ready, Jaxxton and Ainesleigh are shooting a movie on their iPhones.

Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

They'd probably partner with some really high end TV manufacturer and charge $5000 for a 55" TV
for the 1st 2 years. After that there would be too much competition
Posted by shutterspeed
MS Gulf Coast
Member since May 2007
63255 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 5:21 pm to
when u forget to uncheck the lock aspect box
Posted by SixthAndBarone
Member since Jan 2019
8167 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 6:45 pm to
I just want one size for all the shite I watch. Whatever size tvs are, make everything that size and stop this foolishness.
Posted by PJinAtl
Atlanta
Member since Nov 2007
12747 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 7:30 pm to
quote:

Films I think need to be seen in a widescreen aspect:

30"s
Gone with the Wind

GWTW was originally filmed in 1.37:1 (basically 16mm). If you ever catch it on TCM or have seen a screening of a copy of an original print, you get a quaint little box of a movie in the center of this big wide screen.

Later prints of the film (1960s and beyond) stretched it to fit on the wide screens that were common in theaters then, but it wasn't originally that way.
Posted by iliveinabox
in a box
Member since Aug 2011
24115 posts
Posted on 8/14/23 at 7:45 pm to
If the price is about thes same, sure
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram