- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:22 am to Towelie
arn anderson...that dude will always be remembered as being the #2 guy to flair
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:31 am to xiv
Ricky Steamboat
Dibiase
Jake the Snake Roberts
Dibiase
Jake the Snake Roberts
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:39 am to Ric Flair
The Brooklyn Brawler was a better pure wrestler than Hulk Bollea. The run into my foot move Terry did was killer.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:40 am to Maximus
The answer to this is definitey Mr. Kennedy... but it'll happen someday.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:41 am to Maximus
Hulk did have the weakest finishing move ever. A leg drop? Really?
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:47 am to JJ27
quote:
Hulk did have the weakest finishing move ever
Finishing moves in the 80's were in general alot weaker (i.e. British Bulldog's power slam, legdrops), with the exception of submissions and piledrivers.
But the psychology of the matches were so much better. Ole/Arn Anderson targeted their opponents arm for the entire match, to finish with an armbar. Sure, the armbar was not a flashy finisher, but the "working on the arm" the entire match strategy made it believable and interesting.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 10:50 am to Ric Flair
quote:
the "working on the arm" the entire match strategy made it believable and interesting.
You mean it's not believable now?!
Posted on 8/15/08 at 11:23 am to BilJ
Posted on 8/15/08 at 1:06 pm to xiv
The Blue Meanie 
Well, I guess that would technically be the lamest wrestler to never win the title, but is there really a difference?
Well, I guess that would technically be the lamest wrestler to never win the title, but is there really a difference?
Posted on 8/15/08 at 4:54 pm to noladan
Posted on 8/15/08 at 5:28 pm to fightingtiger2335
I am gonna say Sergeant Slaughter
And maybe the Iron Sheik
Dirka Dirka.
And maybe the Iron Sheik
Dirka Dirka.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 5:45 pm to xiv
I totally agree...it's a damn shame he never held the belt...But the Million Dollar Man was so bad arse, he just went out and made his own damn belt 
Posted on 8/15/08 at 5:46 pm to NOBODY
quote:
I am gonna say Sergeant Slaughter
And maybe the Iron Sheik
Dirka Dirka.
...They both held the title.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 5:54 pm to Randazzo
scott hall for sure..."the bad guy"
Posted on 8/15/08 at 6:08 pm to Randazzo
quote:
...They both held the title.
I wouldnt know man...wrestling is fricking gay
Posted on 8/15/08 at 6:10 pm to NOBODY
quote:
I wouldnt know man...wrestling is fricking gay
Hater...
Posted on 8/15/08 at 6:14 pm to Randazzo
Exactly...I hate that shite.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 6:19 pm to LSU CRAZY
Count me in with those who loved JYD. Then i hit puberty and stopped watching wrestling.
Posted on 8/15/08 at 6:23 pm to NOBODY
quote:
I wouldnt know man...wrestling is fricking gay
Truer words have never been spoken.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News