Started By
Message

re: Elizabeth Banks on Charlie's Angels reboot criticism: 'You've had 37 Spider-Man movies'

Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:48 am to
Posted by Mad_Mardigan
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2012
1924 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 9:48 am to
Don't compare Spider-man and Charlie's Angels. Just don't do it. That is wildly moronic.
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34172 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:39 am to
quote:

I think women are allowed to have one or two action franchises every 17 years


What a lie this is. Ghost Busters, Star Wars, Wonder Woman, Captain Marvel, Terminator, Harley Quinn, etc.


I dont care about her take, she's just defending her movie. Thats understandable.

But your calling her a liar and you can only name 6 franchises, one of them is not a female action franchise and 4 of the other 5 have only been done once in that 17 year period. If thats all you got, you're helping her point if anything.
Posted by ZappBrannigan
Member since Jun 2015
7692 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 11:17 am to
To be fair.

Star Wars got Rogue one and a whole trilogy about Rey.

Wonder Woman has 2 movies, 2 ensembles.

Captain Marvel has one movie, 1 ensemble and a hook to keep on in the franchise that isn't stopping.

Underworld got 3 or 4 movies before movies before action girls became girl power movie statements.

Terminator had a 2, 3(to a lesser action degree but still smart as hell), Genesys, and Dark Fate with females leads co-leads.

Harley Quinn was a big draw for Suicide Squad. Has BOP and SS2 in the pipe.

And if we start including TV shows we get way more female action leads and stories.

It's not like there's a dearth of female led media. It's just for the most part the audience doesn't receive it well by either not paying for it or not liking that they paid for it.

Which is why for all the franchises listed above there's a shitload of one offs that were either eh okay or flops.


ETA: And the first 2 Charlie's Angels were fun.
This post was edited on 11/18/19 at 11:21 am
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
10573 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 11:31 am to
She said 1 or 2 in 17 years. I listed 6 in about three years . Banks is a lying sack and she is obviously "allowed" to make these movies just as we are allowed to not see them.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51427 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Elizabeth Banks
@ElizabethBanks

Well, if you’re going to have a flop, make sure your name is on it at least 4x. I’m proud of #CharliesAngels and happy it’s in the world.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59524 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 1:58 pm to
#GirlPower
Posted by wildtigercat93
Member since Jul 2011
112204 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 2:00 pm to
Elizabeth Banks might be the hottest chick in the movie, which might be an issue
Posted by KirkLazarus
Member since Aug 2017
3574 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 2:04 pm to
quote:

If she had put out a great film, no one would care that it’s a reboot of a reboot.




Should have been treated like the first Kingsman film. Rated-R
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

“You’ve had 37 Spider-Man movies and you’re not complaining!”


Someone doesn't come to the M/TV board, I see.

quote:

“I think women are allowed to have one or two action franchises every 17 years — I feel totally fine with that.”


Well, now, the defensive clam is just plain wrong:

Wonder Woman

Captain Marvel

Lara Croft

The upcoming stand alone Black Widow movie

Ghostbusters - the all vagina edition (okay,
straddles the line between comedy and action)

Alien/Aliens etc.

Increasingly - Terminator

Star Wars since the prequels

Underworld

Resident Evil

Mad Max: Fury Road (*Hardy strong enough to make this one a push, but still)

Hunger Games

(and I'm sure I'm missing some)



Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89476 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 2:44 pm to
I was kind of jump started into puberty by these gals.



I would have made sex on them.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

37 Spider-Man movies and you’re not complaining!
bullshite, "The Amazing Spiderman" movies were garbage. There was tons of bitching about how bad those were.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
57426 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Elizabeth Banks might be the hottest chick in the movie, which might be an issue

bro....... Kristen is a bae.
Posted by Arksulli
Fayetteville
Member since Aug 2014
25171 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 3:38 pm to
It is not that she made a reboot with a female cast. It is Charlie's Angels after all.

It is not that men won't go to see a female lead in an action movie. Hell, Wonder Woman managed to save the craptacular DC movie universe.

It is people aren't going to line up to watch a movie that, from the trailers, looked like complete dog crap. Some have liked it, quite a few have not. Based on that a lot of folks are going to give it a pass.

The lesson isn't don't do a female lead movie, it is don't do a bad female lead movie. There have been plenty of crappy male lead superhero/action movies that the fans and audience have crapped on in the last decade.

First of all make a good movie. Male lead, female lead, adorable dog lead, or an animated rectum that speaks via flatulence lead... make a good movie and people will come to see it.
Posted by The Funnie Five
Bluffington
Member since Feb 2019
3404 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 3:38 pm to
People actually watch Spiderman movies and comic book hero movies
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 11/18/19 at 10:57 pm to
I just took one for the M/TV Board and saw this movie with Regal Unlimited. It's beyond bad. The worst movie I've seen since I moved to Nashville 4 years ago.
Posted by Freauxzen
Utah
Member since Feb 2006
37241 posts
Posted on 11/19/19 at 5:50 am to
quote:

I just took one for the M/TV Board and saw this movie with Regal Unlimited. It's beyond bad. The worst movie I've seen since I moved to Nashville 4 years ago.




Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57577 posts
Posted on 11/19/19 at 6:09 am to
If you move around WSJ you get SJW
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
59524 posts
Posted on 11/19/19 at 6:22 am to
That Elizabeth Banks is in the Hunger Games and Pitch Perfect movies, both of which are wildly successful AND feature her, should be enough to have stopped this asinine statement from even being uttered by her.
Posted by Deke88
Member since Nov 2019
40 posts
Posted on 11/19/19 at 6:46 am to
Huh?
Posted by PeteRose
Hall of Fame
Member since Aug 2014
16825 posts
Posted on 11/19/19 at 7:14 am to
quote:

I think women are allowed to have one or two action franchises every 17 years — I feel totally fine with that.”



Yeah, but everybody doesn’t think like you. And you’re allowed to make as many women action movies as you l’d like. But if they suck, then be a grown up and accept it.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram