Started By
Message

re: Dunkirk discussion (NO SPOILERS)

Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:07 am to
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:07 am to
where is it on the IMDB top 100?
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:12 am to
#1
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12268 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:21 am to
It's got a 97 on metacritic. That's insane
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 10:36 am to
For Perspective, No Country for Old Men scored a 91
Posted by hehateme
Tallahassee
Member since Oct 2003
785 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:22 am to
I feel like "lack of character development" is the standard excuse that unsophisticated movie-goers use to criticize a film to seem smart when they don't realize that not all films are "character" films.
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 11:26 am to
It's hard to care about a movie if the characters are bad. I'm not saying they have to be incredibly deep or complex, but if they're so bland that you don't care if they live or die, that's a problem (Rouge One).
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

For Perspective, No Country for Old Men scored a 91



True, but Boyhood got a 100.
Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I feel like "lack of character development" is the standard excuse that unsophisticated movie-goers use to criticize a film to seem smart when they don't realize that not all films are "character" films.



Oh, unquestionably.

That doesn't mean it's never true, but I agree with you.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
51435 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:18 pm to
LOL

Posted by ohiovol
Member since Jan 2010
20828 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:25 pm to
Only 9.9? GTFO
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16915 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

Let other directors play with toy soldiers and computer effects. This is big-time, old-school filmmaking. Dunkirk isn't overdone. It's simply done epically


He used actual aircraft instead of CGI which is such an awesome move. CGI aircraft tend to ruin flicks for me because they perform like arcade video games.

The trade-off is the German 109's are postwar Spanish models so not technically historically accurate but close enough. Same ones that were used in Battle of Britain film.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70890 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 1:14 pm to
Will be seeing this one Thursday in IMAX immediately after work
Posted by jackwoods4
Member since Sep 2013
28667 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 1:33 pm to
Christopher Nolan saw La La Land three times in theater. Just more proof he's the GOAT director.
Posted by cas4t
Member since Jan 2010
70890 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 1:42 pm to
Posted by WicKed WayZ
Louisiana Forever
Member since Sep 2011
31461 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

non-linear approach



I was so excited until I read this. I hate non-linear narrative.
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 2:11 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
115412 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

I was so excited until I read this. I hate non-linear narrative.


It isn't what you think.

Without getting into what some would consider spoilers, it all takes place during the battle of Dunkirk, but the 3 interconnecting stories take place over different lengths of time.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9337 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

He used actual aircraft instead of CGI

I also read where he had over 1,000 people on the beach on a single day during filming
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
64949 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

It's hard to care about a movie if the characters are bad. I'm not saying they have to be incredibly deep or complex, but if they're so bland that you don't care if they live or die, that's a problem (Rouge One).



The characters aren't bad. They just take a back seat to the event that is taking place around them. I saw Dunkirk at a special screening. It's almost as if Nolan wanted you to feel like you were a time traveler who had gone back to 1940 to witness the evacuation. He makes you feel like you are watching real men who were actually there on the beaches, on the sea, and in the air.

In a real-life situation, you aren't going to get any Hollywood cliches about where a soldier was from, who is waiting for them back home, and what job in the civilian world they're going to try for when the war is over.

Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

It's almost as if Nolan wanted you to feel like you were a time traveler who had gone back to 1940 to witness the evacuation. He makes you feel like you are watching real men who were actually there on the beaches, on the sea, and in the air.


Yea, Nolan said he wanted it to be like a virtual reality experience, and by the reviews it sounds like he achieved that
This post was edited on 7/18/17 at 8:43 pm
Posted by Patrick_Bateman
Member since Jan 2012
17823 posts
Posted on 7/18/17 at 8:56 pm to
Just bought a ticket for 70 mm IMAX on Friday. Can't wait.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram