- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
2
Posted on 9/29/11 at 5:09 pm to Leauxgan
Tim Bordens Adventures
Um, Lord of the Rings.
Um, Lord of the Rings.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 5:15 pm to Leauxgan
quote:
the "Oceans" trilogy
1st was tolerable, 2nd was atrocious, 3rd was weak.
Posted on 9/29/11 at 5:26 pm to WG_Dawg
The Bournes followed closely by Transformers
Posted on 10/26/11 at 11:26 pm to TFTC
No love for the Die Hard movies?
Posted on 10/26/11 at 11:37 pm to DoUrden
quote:
No love for the Die Hard movies?
Are these really true Trilogies? (Oceans too)
Where it's basically the same movie over and over and over again.
Shouldn't Trilogies require some advance/grow/change of the story instead of merely replaying the original in a different location?
Godfather, Dollars, Star Wars, they're chapters...not do-overs.
This post was edited on 10/26/11 at 11:38 pm
Posted on 10/26/11 at 11:55 pm to OMLandshark
I am not even sure it is fair to count LOTR in this.
It isn't really a trilogy. It is single 12 hour movie divided into 3 parts.
It didn't 3 distinct stories like everything else.
Even with the super tight tie in of Back to the Future isn't like that.
It isn't really a trilogy. It is single 12 hour movie divided into 3 parts.
It didn't 3 distinct stories like everything else.
Even with the super tight tie in of Back to the Future isn't like that.
This post was edited on 10/27/11 at 1:15 am
Posted on 10/27/11 at 12:07 am to Volvagia
Yeah, I agree.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 12:27 am to Flair Chops
quote:
The Man With No Name Trilogy
ftw
Posted on 10/27/11 at 1:08 am to Harley Keiner
The answer is Star Wars.
This answer is a non debatable fact.
This answer is a non debatable fact.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 1:11 am to NickDoobs
quote:
Star Wars is the only acceptable answer to this question
this guy knows
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:48 am to TigerBandTuba
quote:
The answer is Star Wars.
This answer is a non debatable fact.
I think that Return of the Jedi put a slight damper on it honestly.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:50 am to OMLandshark
Has anyone mentioned the Blade trilogy yet? 
Posted on 10/27/11 at 3:57 am to Neauxla
quote:
Has anyone mentioned the Blade trilogy yet?
No because it is a terrible trilogy.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 4:57 am to TigerBandTuba
Lord of the Rings has aged better than Star Wars.
Interesting question: Which story do you think took place further in the past?
3rd age of Earth (right?) vs. a long long time ago
Interesting question: Which story do you think took place further in the past?
3rd age of Earth (right?) vs. a long long time ago
Posted on 10/27/11 at 5:25 am to Pectus
quote:
3rd age of Earth (right?) vs. a long long time ago
Congrats Pectus, you've set a new bar on nerdiest question ever asked on this board.
Posted on 10/27/11 at 7:14 am to OMLandshark
The Godfather. The first 2 are among the best movies ever. The Godfather III is not a terrible film, but it is nowhere near the quality of the first 2. If Copola wouldn't have put his daughter in it, then it would have been a lot better.
The quality of the first 2 carries the trilogy.
The quality of the first 2 carries the trilogy.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News