- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/6/19 at 8:58 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
He threw him in the river
I wonder did he bob up like a floater
Posted on 1/6/19 at 8:59 pm to JCinBAMA
I dont see why he couldnt just leave his arse at the next settlement. Too much trouble I guess
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:00 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Because it is one million percent clear what happens with zero other interpretation,
I beg to differ.
He ate that kid. Piece by piece. And then traded him for a chicken which was more convenient.
That's a way better ending than he just threw him over a bridge.
If he could just throw him over a bridge, why did the stumpy even go along with him all that time? Why perform every night if they had no bond and no relationship?
That was his son and he slowly ate him.
This post was edited on 1/6/19 at 9:03 pm
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:02 pm to Nguyener
you just made your own ending up. There’s literally no indication that he was eating the kid at all. It’s clear as day what happenedPosted on 1/6/19 at 9:03 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
There’s literally no indication that he was eating the kid at all
The name of the thing was meal ticket and an extremely well known western story is canablism in the harsh winter.
Also, the Cohen Brothers tend to shoot things very deliberately. And there was alot of camera panning and acting based around food and then shots of the stumpy kid.
quote:
you just made your own ending up.
Possible, but it's a better ending.
This post was edited on 1/7/19 at 6:26 am
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:04 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
I dont see why he couldnt just leave his arse at the next settlement. Too much trouble I guess
Yea it was sad the kid seen it coming, what could he
do couldn't run away or fight back.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:04 pm to Nguyener
quote:
The name of the thing was meal ticket a
Because the kids performance was literally his meal ticket because he couldn’t fend for himself and as soon as it stopped making money he was quickly replaced by the chicken and thrown away like nothing.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:06 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
Because the kids performance was literally his meal ticket
Or the kid was literally his meal.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:07 pm to Nguyener
Well good luck trying to convince people of that because you’re literally the only person who saw it that way
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:08 pm to wildtigercat93
quote:
you’re literally the only person who saw it that way
Really?
You've talked to every other person who saw the movie?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:09 pm to Nguyener
Find me any sort of article or review that mentions it
I don’t need to talk to every other person to reasonably assume that most people have eyes and knows how to use them
I don’t need to talk to every other person to reasonably assume that most people have eyes and knows how to use them
This post was edited on 1/6/19 at 9:10 pm
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:20 pm to Fewer Kilometers
So I guess we can't discuss or enjoy movie theories anymore? Just read Wikipedia summaries and never see a different angle?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:23 pm to JCinBAMA
quote:
I wonder did he bob
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:23 pm to Fewer Kilometers
Now there's a fanatataic Underrated show. I miss The Oblongs
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:27 pm to Nguyener
Did you miss the part where Liam looks down at the river?
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:35 pm to Nguyener
quote:
That was his son
Not sure how you came up with their being father and son. The characters didn’t have names. Neeson is listed in the credits as “Impresario” which means manager.
It’s as if you wrote your own little secret backstory to this movie.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:40 pm to Nguyener
quote:
So I guess we can't discuss or enjoy movie theories anymore?
You didn’t present it as a theory. You just passed it off as a matter of fact when there’s no evidence at all to support it and in fact you have to actively ignore parts of the plot in order to make it viable
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:48 pm to Nguyener
I haven’t seen this movie and probably won’t, but I like the “he ate him” version better.
Posted on 1/6/19 at 9:54 pm to wildtigercat93
Whew. I’m glad I’m not the only one that had no idea what that dude was talking about
I read that and thought I must be retarded because I didn’t get any of the stuff he was talking about.
Didn’t they show Liam finding the kid and wasn’t he always completely limbless?
I read that and thought I must be retarded because I didn’t get any of the stuff he was talking about.
Didn’t they show Liam finding the kid and wasn’t he always completely limbless?
This post was edited on 1/6/19 at 9:56 pm
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News