- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2000 mules.. the voter fraud documentary
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:44 pm to VoxDawg
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:44 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
I'd settle for an explanation for why the same individuals have been on video dropping off multiple ballots at the same dropboxes at all hours of the day/night.
doesn't matter it isn't illegal. Most states allow someone other than the voter to turn in the ballots.
https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_harvesting_laws_by_state
0
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:48 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
63 court cases, Trump’s own AG’s statement, a Supreme Court statement, and a bunch of audits versus one dumbass who got arrested for fraud
Who trust
When is the last time votes for a national election stopped being counted, only to resume again at 3 am?
Explain the "burst pipe" in Fulton county precinct.
Explain how this...
that is now responsible for inflation, energy costs, border crisis, fentanyl surge in the US, supply chain issues, received the most votes in the history of this country.
The same "81 million vote" president of which had 1/2 of his followers purged from twitter for being bots.
I'll wait.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:49 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
'd settle for an explanation for why the same individuals have been on video dropping off multiple ballots at the same dropboxes at all hours of the day/night. Big Momma's corns are painin' her? Auntie Reecee's sugar acting up? Li'l Kool-Aid has to work late again? Bonus points for explaining why some mules were wearing latex gloves when they dropped off the ballots and immediately discarded them. Bonus points for a rational explanation of the mules fanning out the ballots like Benjamins and snapping pics of them immediately before placing in dropboxes.
This. But I’d also like to know who is casting votes for people who are either dead or almost dead. Or people who are illegal. How the they doing it and how many?
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:49 pm to BobMayonnaise
The courts that are compromised aren't going to look at it.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 1:54 pm to dchog
quote:
The courts that are compromised aren't going to look at it.
Even the Judges Trump selected huh? mmm okay
EVERYONE IS LYING BUT TRUMP lol
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:06 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
and your obvious ignorance on how burden of proof works is glaring. If you make a claim it is your job to provide the proof not....and I can't stress this enough...Mine to disprove you.
Oof. There’s nothing like a poster who claims melting and then does absolutely nothing but say “bring me more proof that I’m wrong!”
as stated before in this very thread, you people do one thing consistently, when provided evidence, you call it fake or unreliable and ask for more evidence. Then when you’re challenged, -what does your ilk do?Call anyone defying your masters a conspiracy theorists. And the cycle repeats itself. It’s your indoctrination that leads you to this cycle. It’s a silly game you play to keep your owners lies up.
I’m not going to do your research for your lazy arse. I mentioned Greenwald. Start there and maybe it will open your eyes. Or you will call him a Russian sympathizer. And so on and so on.
And for anyone else reading this, Greenwald is leftist, smeared by your DC overlords, for dismantling RussiaGate, as that came from the DNC(who broke the chain of custody with the servers intentionally) and the Clinton campaign -you know SoS who helped put in a puppet government in the Ukraine.Like Tulsi Gabbard was smeared.
Read what Assange has to say about the matter. Go listen to Jimmy Dore.
Literally do anything but read something from corporate media. They are paid to lie to you by the military industrial complex. That’s why idiots wear inefficient masks and get quadruple boosted.
And their sycophants, like this poster above who offers very little contribution , are indeed the very type to commit election crimes in the name of their self appointed greater morality.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:07 pm to mattchewbocca
quote:
Has anyone here watched the movie yet? If you havnt I suggest refraining from commenting until you do so. And if your opinion still stands and it’s not enough to convince you that at the very least there was some shady shite going on then fine. If anything it’s a great indication that our elections are flawed as hell and they can pay people to flood the ballot boxes with fake ballots to sway an election.
All the movie did was provide some evidence that ballot harvesting exists. It never showed a shred of evidence that the ballots were fraudulent. Ballot harvesting isn't even illegal in most states. Is it shady? Yeah.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:07 pm to dawgfan24348
quote:
Trump ran an absolutely piss poor campaign in 2020
If Trump ran a piss poor campaign, then what did Joe run? Do i need to tell you about the rally attendance of each, or even the number of rallies between each?
I'm sure you think running a great campaign was putting a lid the month prior to an election, on your campaign at 11 am because he was tired is sound strategy?
Do i need to list the numerous statistical impossibilities that happened in the swing states? You know them all. You just hate Trump so much that you can't fathom to believe the left would cheat, even though you very well know they did.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:11 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
now that is how you melt little snowflake
Now that is how you avoid the topic because you have nothing to counter with, and hope an idiotic response will suffice.
It's telling, mindbreaker, that you and so many of you regressives never go back to the poliboard. Too much ammunition against POTATUS to defend?
This post was edited on 5/23/22 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:27 pm to BugAC
quote:
Now that is how you avoid the topic because you have nothing to counter with, and hope an idiotic response will suffice.
literally linked ballot harvesting laws in this thread continue cherry picking though.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:36 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
“bring me more proof that I’m wrong!”
I made zero claims of anything besides pointing out you are melting.
quote:
when provided evidence
you provided zero evidence for anything you said.
quote:
you call it fake or unreliable and ask for more evidence.
Like calling out every media source that doesn't agree with you "fake news" pot kettle much?
quote:
Then when you’re challenged
You have yet to challenge me kid
quote:
Call anyone defying your masters
funny of you to assume whom i support. scour my post history find one iota of a mention of where I support Joe Biden or the democrats. I can hate both of you equally if i want its a free country after all.
quote:
I’m not going to do your research for your lazy arse.
because you have zero evidence but thanks for confirming it for everyone. Telling us to go listen to people that agree with you is not evidence. Its group speak and confirmation bias. Thanks for playing though.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:58 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
You have yet to challenge me kid
Lol,hence your line by line breakdown. And I’m likely older than you, son.
quote:it’s not assuming it’s deciphering. What’s funny is I specifically said I didn’t vote for trump and specifically used the term DC overlords. Surely you don’t think that’s limited to democrats? You have to be smarter than that, I think.
funny of you to assume whom i support. scour my post history find one iota of a mention of where I support Joe Biden or the democrats. I can hate both of you equally if i want its a free country after all.
quote:
because you have zero evidence but thanks for confirming it for everyone. Telling us to go listen to people that agree with you is not evidence. Its group speak and confirmation bias. Thanks for playing though.
No, dummy, it’s called getting ahead of your silly game, that in standard shite lib fashion, you imagine yourself ahead.My suggested reading is something you can do, but that doesn’t fit your agenda. You can lead a horse to water. You already threw out the term conspiracy theory, it’s the first page of the Dem playbook. The next page is saying all evidence is not vetted by “trusted sources” etc.
People like you have done this for almost a decade now. It’s equally humorous and depressing as your kind is poisoning the well, just like DC wants it to be done.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 2:58 pm to ThanosIsADemocrat
quote:
I’m not going to do your research for your lazy arse.
This is the correct approach. Even the obvious stuff isn't going to change their minds, so it doesn't pay to entertain them.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 3:03 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
This is the correct approach.
Of course it is when you have zero evidence.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 3:50 pm to VoxDawg
quote:
Even the obvious stuff isn't going to change their minds, so it doesn't pay to entertain them.
That’s because what they have been indoctrinated into thinking is that if it’s not “vetted”by the DC apparatus and funneled to the American voter through their media wing, that it’s “fake”. It’s not on them. Yeah buddy people like them keep voting for evil, it is certainly their responsibility at this point to wake up. Hell they can’t even tell you what a woman is nowadays
Serial deceit by the media.
What smart people don’t get it, is that you don’t have to be dumb to be indoctrinated.
And look who makes up the corporate news media nowadays? Michael Hayden? You have to explain to these idiots, not exclusive to this one person, that a former CIA/NSA director is put on CNN isn’t lying to the American public everyday for the benefit of his intelligence community? Or Bill Kristol of MSNBC isn’t a neocon warmonger?
Or Jeffery Goldberg- a strong supporter of the Iraq War now spearheading The Atlantic?
They buried the laptop story calling it fake news, only to now do a complete 180. That Pfizer isn’t making microchip pills for citizens to ingest. All these “conspiracy theories” that are actually proven true.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 3:53 pm to Fewer Kilometers
quote:
It’s in a movie. It had to be true.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 4:06 pm to dchog
quote:
The courts that are compromised aren't going to look at it.
lmfao.
"We're going to win this in the courts. The Supreme Court will overturn this!"
*lose, emphatically*
"The courts were obviously compromised."
Posted on 5/23/22 at 4:20 pm to mattchewbocca
quote:
Bonus points for explaining why some mules were wearing latex gloves when they dropped off the ballots and immediately discarded them. Bonus points for a rational explanation of the mules fanning out the ballots like Benjamins and snapping pics of them immediately before placing in dropboxes.
Are you surprised mindbreaker wouldnt answer?? Typical
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:24 pm to TotesMcGotes
Fraud occurred in the 2000 elections when the Dems cheated with Gore but at that time, you didn't have the one party of today. That was overturned because you had an opposition party that fought back.
Now both parties are in cahoots together and both fought against Trump each step of the way.
Now both parties are in cahoots together and both fought against Trump each step of the way.
Posted on 5/23/22 at 7:47 pm to BobMayonnaise
No surprise as Rick Scott is a Rino.
Page 7 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News