- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
World-champion wrestler sues NCAA over eligibility to compete for Iowa State
Posted on 12/17/25 at 9:35 am
Posted on 12/17/25 at 9:35 am
quote:
AMES, Iowa (IOWA CAPITAL DISPATCH) - A world-champion Cuban wrestler, Reineri Andreu Ortega, is suing the National Collegiate Athletic Association over rules that he says have unfairly barred him from wrestling for Iowa State University.
The lawsuit was filed this week by lawyers for Ortega, a student and prospective college wrestler at ISU, in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa. The lawsuit challenges the NCAA’s so-called “Five-Year Eligibility Clock” and the manner in which the NCAA decides when that clock begins running and thus when a student’s eligibility to compete expires.
Attorneys for Ortega argue that the NCAA’s application of the rule violates antitrust laws and unjustifiably restrains the ability of Ortega and other college athletes to “earn meaningful compensation that is now available to (other) NCAA Division I athletes.”
The lawsuit has its origins in a 2021 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that paved the way for college athletes to receive compensation for use of their names, images, and likenesses. Since then, the market for name, image and likeness compensation opportunities available to NCAA Division I athletes has “exploded into a multi-million dollar industry,” the lawsuit claims.
However, the lawsuit adds, that form of compensation is largely available only to NCAA Division I athletes. Athletes who compete outside of what the lawsuit calls “the NCAA monopoly” have no meaningful opportunity to collect revenue-sharing income or profit from their name, image or likeness.
Under NCAA bylaws, an athlete has five years of eligibility to play four seasons of “intercollegiate competition” in his or her chosen sport. This five-year window is known as as the “eligibility clock” and begins to run from the date on which an athlete registers as a full-time student at any “collegiate institution” – regardless of whether the institution is a member of the NCAA and regardless of their participation in sports.
Lawyers for Ortega say this rule has had the effect of barring students from competing in NCAA sports even if they’ve never competed. They say students such as Ortega “can attend a non-NCAA college for three years without playing any sports, take two years off from school for personal reasons, transfer to a four-year NCAA school, and the student will have used all of their eligibility without ever having competed in a college sport for a non-NCAA or NCAA college.”
LINK
Here to go…
Posted on 12/17/25 at 10:11 am to ragincajun03
All college athletes are now professionals, so why not?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:41 am to ragincajun03
quote:
They say students such as Ortega “can attend a non-NCAA college for three years without playing any sports, take two years off from school for personal reasons, transfer to a four-year NCAA school, and the student will have used all of their eligibility without ever having competed in a college sport for a non-NCAA or NCAA college.”
Two questions:
1. Is this not already the case if you take time off and you're enrolled in an NCAA institution? Why would non NCAA be any different??
2. Why would an athlete looking to profit off of NIL choose to enroll in a college where they don't feel they can profit off of NIL?
Posted on 12/17/25 at 11:43 am to Bigdawgb
He’s likely talking about JUCO athletes and NAIA athletes (not sure if they count)
because they are under the NJCAA
because they are under the NJCAA
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:05 pm to ragincajun03
He has the right, as does anyone, to earn money for his name, image, and likeness. NIL is protection of those rights for athletes competing within the structure of a specific athletic association, which has the right to determine the eligibility requirements for competing within their association.
He should also sue the American Medical Association for limiting his income potential if they don't let him join.
He should also sue the American Medical Association for limiting his income potential if they don't let him join.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 12:22 pm to ragincajun03
Isn't this pretty close to what Pavia did? He was in Cba with limited options until he sought refugee status in the US. They are accounting for his time since graduating from high school in Cuba, rather than when he enrolled in college in the US after leaving Cuba.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 2:54 pm to Red Drum
quote:
He has the right, as does anyone, to earn money for his name, image, and likeness. NIL is protection of those rights for athletes competing within the structure of a specific athletic association, which has the right to determine the eligibility requirements for competing within their association.
This is common sense to most people.
But there are still a number of them that don’t understand the ncaa is a completely voluntary organization that no one is forced to participate in. The courts are among that number.
Posted on 12/17/25 at 4:09 pm to ragincajun03
He's 27 years old. Let it go. Its fricking college sports meant for 18-22 year old students, not dudes who should have a mortgage and 401k.
Popular
Back to top
5








