- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woj: Lakers and Celtics engaged with New Orleans for Anthony Davis
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:44 pm to Rep520
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:44 pm to Rep520
quote:
That's not how a do over works.
What
The combinations wouldn't change because different teams were in the slots.
The same combinations would get picked.
0
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:44 pm to David Ricky
Yes, we know.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:44 pm to Mr Perfect
Those are win totals not championship odds
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:44 pm to Mr Perfect
is your shtick just being a complete moron and dropping stupid one liners to get downvotes? What an odd shtick. That or you’re retarded.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:45 pm to Epic Cajun
quote:
or is that right before the season started?
win totals post in aug
This post was edited on 6/12/19 at 4:46 pm
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:46 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Yes, we know.
Ok? It wasn’t posted anywhere ITT
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:49 pm to 187undercover
quote:
The 4th pick is trash.
dont completely understand the apathy toward #4
its garland right? hes good
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:50 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
If they finish with even 1 win or loss more that does not happen.
So in this alternate universe every team has different records, but the lottery combo doesn't change?
It's a stretch to act like Zion wouldn't happen with that trade.
However, the 'gamble', in hindsight, worked for both teams IMO.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:51 pm to Weagle25
quote:
CHI getting: Lonzo
Poor Bulls
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:51 pm to slackster
quote:
the 'gamble', in hindsight, worked for both teams IMO.
this true.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:51 pm to slackster
quote:
but the lottery combo doesn't change?
Why would the lottery combinations change?
Are you thinking some kind of butterfly effect that magically changes the way balls bounce?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:51 pm to Mr Perfect
Is functioning NBA retard your schtick on the MSB?
Like Anti-Boom?
Like Anti-Boom?
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:51 pm to slackster
quote:
It's a stretch to act like Zion wouldn't happen with that trade.
It isn't a remote stretch. It would not have happened. Period.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:52 pm to rocket31
quote:
its garland right? hes good
I seriously doubt that the Pelicans would want Garland.
1) Very low basketball IQ
2) KLUTCH SPORTS CLIENT.
I'm thinking they want nothing to do with Klutch at this point if they can avoid it.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:53 pm to slackster
quote:
However, the 'gamble', in hindsight, worked for both teams IMO.
I think the "gamble" for the Pels is that they wanted Zion over any asset that was on the table. The only way that they could ensure that they get Zion was to wait until after the draft lottery to make a trade. That's it, IMO.
Now, a crazy turn of events happened and they landed Zion without having to make an AD trade, so things have changed, but in the end I think Zion was their priority.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:54 pm to rocket31
quote:
its garland right? hes good
I mean I like Garland as much as anyone, but he played 5 college games against subpar talent, lets pump the brakes
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:55 pm to slackster
quote:It's not a stretch. Just like it's not a stretch to think NO would not land Zion if they drafted again tonight.
So in this alternate universe every team has different records, but the lottery combo doesn't change?
It's a stretch to act like Zion wouldn't happen with that trade.
They're just arguing that it worked out, not that it was a master plan that resulted in it working out.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:57 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
I seriously doubt that the Pelicans would want Garland.
1) Very low basketball IQ
2) KLUTCH SPORTS CLIENT
got it, makes sense.
i guess my overall point is that the #4 HAS potential and is not some complete trash prospect
Posted on 6/12/19 at 4:59 pm to rocket31
The 4th pick has definitely gained traction. Guys like Culver and Garland have seemed to be gaining some value.
Posted on 6/12/19 at 5:01 pm to Fun Bunch
true but the fact that the same guys getting named at #4 are also being seen at #10 in mock drafts tells you that there are a lot of different opinions on prospects out there
Page 7 of 20
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News