Started By
Message

re: Will Andrew Luck retire as GOAT?

Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:08 pm to
Posted by CBandits82
Lurker since May 2008
Member since May 2012
59021 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Tony Romo and Ben Roethlisberger are outplaying Andrew Luck this year.











































































Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:13 pm to
An argument can be made for both of those QBs.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

An argument can be made for both of those QBs
Yeh, but ESPN didnt tell him that so you get this response

Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22530 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

He's a turnover machine as it stands. People need to cool it on this Andrew Luck hype. He's good right now, but still makes a ton of mistakes.

He's not in the elite category right now.





Please check facts before you post bruh because you're making yourself look like an idiot

Andrew Luck in 3 seasons 41 INTs
Peyton Manning in first 3 seasons 58 INTs

Sure seems Peyton Manning turned out alright...
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 3:26 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Please check facts before you post bruh because you're making yourself look like an idiot

Andrew Luck in 3 seasons 41 INTs
Peyton Manning in first 3 seasons 58 INTs

Sure seems Peyton Manning turned out alright...
Please read what he said though. He said he isnt ELITE RIGHT NOW. So his point stands. Now the OP wanted to know about the future. Post his reasoning for talking about the present makes sense
Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22530 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:31 pm to
da faq?

you just proved my point

What does turnovers three years into a career have anything to do with it?

I proved how Manning overcome INTs to become a potential GOAT. Why can't Luck?

Elite right now has nothing to do with it. He's a top 5 QB but he has the potential to be among the greatest QBs if he continues to improve....how can one argue against that?
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

He's a top 5 QB but he has the potential to be among the greatest QBs if he continues to improve....how can one argue against that?


You could argue that he isn't a top 5 QB
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Elite right now has nothing to do with it. He's a top 5 QB but he has the potential to be among the greatest QBs if he continues to improve....how can one argue against that?
Are you reading? He wasnt arguing that Luck one day wont be elite(even though that is the question in the OP). He is arguing that his turnovers keep him from being ELITE RIGHT NOW
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:35 pm to
Rodgers
Brady
Peyton
Brees
Roeth

All currently ahead of him, IMO.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Rodgers
Brady
Peyton
Brees
Roeth

All currently ahead of him, IMO.
I would also include Romo right now as well.
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:40 pm to
Romo has been having a great season, but his history of choking at the end of the game makes me put Luck over him.

Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22530 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:42 pm to
quote:

He is arguing that his turnovers keep him from being ELITE RIGHT NOW


And?

I proved that zero fricks are given. Peyton Manning averaged nearly 20 INTs for the first five years of his career.

That argument holds zero weight here

Carry on now
Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22530 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:43 pm to
quote:

I would also include Romo right now as well.



Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

And?

I proved that zero fricks are given. Peyton Manning averaged nearly 20 INTs for the first five years of his career.

That argument holds zero weight here

Carry on now

I tried not to be mean, but you are SOOOOOOOOO STTUUUUUPPPIDDDDD. Peyton wasnt elite in his third season either. So yes, the argument that he isnt elite right now because of turnovers holds alot of weight
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:44 pm to
2nd best comp % in the league
better YPA
higher PFF rating
higher QB rating

Luck has more yards and TDs, sure. Because he has attempted 200 more passes.

Romo has been more efficient this season.
This post was edited on 12/16/14 at 3:46 pm
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

2nd best comp % in the league
better YPA
higher PFF rating
higher QB rating
He has no clue what right now means.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84434 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:51 pm to
No
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111294 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

No
Simple, to the point, and educated. I like Sabi's style
Posted by jimithing11
Dillon, Texas
Member since Mar 2011
22530 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

Romo has been more efficient this season.



One season does not excuse him from almost 10 or so years of frick ups
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 12/16/14 at 3:54 pm to
quote:

One season does not excuse him from almost 10 or so years of frick ups

Talking about right now, bruh. As has been stated numerous times already.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram