Started By
Message

re: Why has boxing become so boring?

Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:58 am to
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32814 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:58 am to
Obviously I was being slightly facetious with the gsp/klit comment, but my point still remains. And it's not out of reasonable realm to think GSP would be incapable of taking klit down. Afterall, how good is his takedown defense? Would he be able to get up if he was on the ground? How's his guard?
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 1:03 am to
Would he even be able to shoot in against some who is 6'6 250?

You can always say that there is a chance that he could win a fight, but the % would be really low.
Posted by UFownstSECsince1950
Member since Dec 2009
32814 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 1:14 am to
If he were to connect with a punch or a kick, it'd obviously be lights out for GSP. But for someone who has thrown strikes their entire life without fear of being taken down, it's going to be hard to simply change his style. Obviously GSP/klit is a bad example/match-up and highly unfair, but I don't think the percentages would be that low for GSP. All he needs is a small window, a slight opening, only a piece of one of klit's massive legs for the takedown. It's a long ways down when you're 6'6", and it would be really hard to get back up. Sucks we can only speculate....
Posted by SpqrTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2004
9700 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 9:29 am to
MMA doesn't make boxing boring.

I don't even think the occasional dud title fight makes boxing boring.

I'll tell you what makes it boring.

Quick... name the WBA super middleweight champion.

How about the IBF welterweight champion?

WBO light heavyweight champion? Anyone?

See what I'm getting at? There's no drama in boxing because nobody knows who these people are. There's no storytelling in boxing anymore. Back in the day, you knew who Joe Frazier was and what country Roberto Duran came from. You knew Marvin Hagler hadn't lost a fight for 10 years and you knew Mitch "Blood" Green lost one of his gold teeth in a fight with Mike Tyson.

Boxing has become non-media friendly because of the exclusivity of its television strategy (pay per view). No one knows or cares about who the good fighters are, other than those few who can't be ignored. Two generations of potential boxing fans have already been left out of the fold because boxing didn't seek them out as viewers when they were young.

Boxing needs an organizational overhaul from top to bottom. There needs to be a huge constitutional convention for it. Perhaps the Vatican can host it?
Posted by BallyHOO
Member since Oct 2005
6854 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 9:52 am to
no mike tyson
Posted by Mattdaddy311
Left of center
Member since Jan 2007
6193 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 11:51 am to
quote:

MMA doesn't make boxing boring.

I don't even think the occasional dud title fight makes boxing boring.

I'll tell you what makes it boring.

Quick... name the WBA super middleweight champion.

How about the IBF welterweight champion?

WBO light heavyweight champion? Anyone?


I wouldn't say this is what's making boxing boring, but this is what's killing boxing. Sanctioning bodies and promoters are destroying the sport. That is something the UFC has gotten right.

Styles make fights. It's the same in boxing and the UFC. So no matter what both sports are going to have there share of boring fights.
Posted by colemans04
Virginia
Member since Aug 2007
226 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:06 pm to
Right, too many belts in too many weight classes.

IMO, I believe counter punchers are what killed the sport. They win fights, but they don't win the fans over. Guys like Bernard Hopkins and Floyd Mayweather get so much publicity, so when people buy their PPV's and see how boring their fights are, it drives them away from the sport.

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
475937 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Right, too many belts in too many weight classes.

i do think this has disenfranchised your "common fan" to a large extent, but exciting fights at the top weights would still bring them in to watch

quote:

IMO, I believe counter punchers are what killed the sport. They win fights, but they don't win the fans over. Guys like Bernard Hopkins and Floyd Mayweather get so much publicity, so when people buy their PPV's and see how boring their fights are, it drives them away from the sport

counter punchers and super jab HWs

it's just the natural progression of sport
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24342 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

If he were to connect with a punch or a kick, it'd obviously be lights out for GSP. But for someone who has thrown strikes their entire life without fear of being taken down, it's going to be hard to simply change his style. Obviously GSP/klit is a bad example/match-up and highly unfair, but I don't think the percentages would be that low for GSP. All he needs is a small window, a slight opening, only a piece of one of klit's massive legs for the takedown. It's a long ways down when you're 6'6", and it would be really hard to get back up. Sucks we can only speculate....


So you are going to put Klitschko in an MMA environment. I was under the impression that this was a fight. No gloves, no cage, no ref. Because in a fight Vitali could literally pick GSP off the ground and HURL him eight feet through the air if he tried to wrap his legs. That's how different they are in size. It would be Kimo and Royce all over again except Vitali is a much better and larger man than Kimo.

Wow this is a dumb argument.

I agree that boxing no longer being regularly broadcast on network TV has certainly led to it's decline. You get talent by kids growing up watching and wanting to participate in the sport. Boxing hasn't been on network tv in what? 30 years?

Is there any wonder that it's not as popular as it was? In Europe it is still a very popular sport and so most of the good fighters are coming from Europe or Mexico now. There are a few isolated areas of the US that are producing boxers (LA, Philly, and Boston) but as a whole the country does not encourage boxing.

Americans don't give a shite about a sport unless Americans are fighting. Just look at F1 racing. Tons of talent, beautiful women, fast cars, but no Americans and so Americans don't give a shite.

This post was edited on 7/4/11 at 12:19 pm
Posted by colemans04
Virginia
Member since Aug 2007
226 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:17 pm to
And I'm afraid with the new concussion studies coming out, boxing will be talked about in the past tense in about 10 years.
Posted by PurpleandGold Motown
Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Oct 2007
24342 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 12:20 pm to
Well then they should just go ahead and ban football.

Professional athletes choose to endanger their body for the sport. That is why they are so well compensated. Amateurs still wear head gear, but when you decide to turn pro you take on a certain level of risk. You give up years of your life (you die quicker) in order to make a ton of money and live the good life. Some think that is a fair trade.
Posted by theunknownknight
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2005
60899 posts
Posted on 7/4/11 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

Why has boxing become so boring?


It seems most fighters are too afraid to go on the offensive these days. Many fighters would rather through a sissy jab that counts as a punch and move around the ring avoiding the other fighter until they accumulate enough points to win.

Actual punches are rarely thrown nowadays.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram