- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why don't the Bengals cut ties with Shemir Stewart and just sign Hendrickson to a deal?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:11 pm to TackySweater
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:11 pm to TackySweater
quote:
I mean. It’s painfully obvious why he was suspended. Anyone with a 1/4 working brain can see this lol
you mean like the reason we explained to you about an hour ago or the terminology you are gonna give us that the Colts technically used to void it?
they voided him because he was washed and wasn't worth the money. they used his wife's pregnancy issues and him missing the flight and not giving forward acknowledgement (of his wife going into labor at 28 weeks) as the cause of how he violated the terms of the contract.
The players union fought it because It's not in spirit of the contract. Now the players all have to read every word and take it all technically because the owners have shown they'll do anything to save a dollar.
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 5:14 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:13 pm to Corinthians420
It wasn’t because he missed a flight lol. You don’t actually believe that do you? 
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:17 pm to TackySweater
Can you read
They were gonna cut him that offseason. Him missing the flight just gave them a way to do it and save more money.
quote:
they voided him because he was washed and wasn't worth the money.
They were gonna cut him that offseason. Him missing the flight just gave them a way to do it and save more money.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:19 pm to Corinthians420
Ohhhh ok lol
Damn. Did NFL owners or GMs bang y’all sig others or something?

Damn. Did NFL owners or GMs bang y’all sig others or something?
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:21 pm to TackySweater
Do you not follow sports? Anyone that does has seen why you cant leave anything to the owners to act in good faith....
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:24 pm to Corinthians420
Posted on 7/25/25 at 5:44 pm to RLDSC FAN
Hope he's good after all of this.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:01 pm to sicboy
Sounds like they kept the language in but gave him his guaranteed money sooner and more at signing instead of dragging it out over the life of the contract. At least that’s what the twitter rumors are saying
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:03 pm to lsufball19
quote:I heard the same. $500k more upfront now with the signing bonus and the Bengals kept the language they wanted. Funny how money will change up your principles like that. I’m with the Bengals though, NFL is a life changing opportunity, we should hold the players accountable to their actions. Go to practice, go home, stay out of trouble.
Sounds like they kept the language in but gave him his guaranteed money sooner and more at signing instead of dragging it out over the life of the contract. At least that’s what the twitter rumors are saying
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:25 pm to HangmanPage1
quote:
I’m with the Bengals though, NFL is a life changing opportunity, we should hold the players accountable to their actions. Go to practice, go home, stay out of trouble.
“But what if he wants to call his gf a bitch?!?!”
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 6:26 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:26 pm to Corinthians420
quote:
Do you not follow sports? Anyone that does has seen why you cant leave anything to the owners to act in good faith....
And players are all total angels lol
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:27 pm to TackySweater
Yikes. Rough news for everyone here who said they’d never agree to this lol
Money made them tap. Surprise surprise lol
Money made them tap. Surprise surprise lol
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 6:28 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:35 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Yikes. Rough news for everyone here who said they’d never agree to this lol
But I thought they weren’t willing to negotiate? That’s what you said
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:44 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Money made them tap. Surprise surprise
The payout of his money was the entire point of the holdout, so yes money did get the contract dispute resolved. But I was under the impression they were unwilling to negotiate even though they said they wanted to negotiate. I guess it was actually the latter
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:44 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
But I thought they weren’t willing to negotiate? That’s what you said
No. That’s what his camp said lol
And we’ve already established that they’ve flip flopped throughout the process and have made conflicting statements publicly. Try to catch up.
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:45 pm to lsufball19
quote:
But I was under the impression they were unwilling to negotiate even though they said they wanted to negotiate. I guess it was actually the latter
Good god lol
quote:
The payout of his money was the entire point of the holdout, so yes money did get the contract dispute resolved.
Yep. Money made them tap out and give in against their “what’s right” approach. Funny how some are big on principles and holding fast to what tbey think is fair until you flash some money in their face lol
Anyone with half a brain knew they were going to eventually give in and agree to the clause. Hopefully he can avoid doing stupid things, for his sake lol
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 6:49 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:49 pm to TackySweater
quote:
Good god lol
I know right. They were, in fact, willing to negotiate after all. So you were, oh what’s the word I’m looking for?….wrong
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 6:50 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:50 pm to lsufball19
quote:
know right. They were, in fact, willing to negotiate after all
Sure. And that went against what they said publicly. But hey man, this might be your first “win” here. What a way to celebrate lol
Tell us again about Trent Richardson. That’ll get you crashing back down to earth
This post was edited on 7/25/25 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:51 pm to TackySweater
quote:
And that went against what they said publicly.
They publicly said they wanted to negotiate. Just take the L guy
Posted on 7/25/25 at 6:51 pm to lsufball19
quote:
They publicly said they wanted to negotiate. Just take the L guy
Link?
They also publicly said they didn’t want to. But hey, nice “win”
Popular
Back to top


1




