- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who's the 3rd best player in the NBA?
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:23 pm to Ostrich
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:23 pm to Ostrich
quote:
I would take Parker, or even Westbrook ahead of CP3 because they have proven they can lead a team to success. Parker more so, he even has a Finals MVP to show for it.
I like how one round further and still coming away empty handed is considered "leading a team to success".
Give me Chris Paul as the 3rd best player
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:24 pm to jturn17
Top 7 pgs:
1. Cp3
2. Westbrook
3. Rondo
4. T.P.
5. Curry
6. Irving
7. Rose
1. Cp3
2. Westbrook
3. Rondo
4. T.P.
5. Curry
6. Irving
7. Rose
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:24 pm to RonBurgundy
quote:
that's laughable.
So the guy dogs chris Paul out every time they matchup with each other, has won more MVPs than chris Paul, has led his teams to better records than Chris Paul. But it is laughable that Rose is better than Paul........okay.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:26 pm to Ostrich
quote:Duncan was the best player on the team still. I don't think it's accurate to say Parker was the #1 guy. That transformation didn't really happen until a couple years later.
Parker was the #1 guy on the 2007 championship team.
Honestly, Manu was still probably the 2nd best player on that 2007 team as well, especially during that playoff run.
quote:Considering Derrick Rose didn't deserve his MVP and Paul was robbed of an MVP, I'm not sure this is a strong argument in your favor.
has won more MVPs than chris Paul
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 5:29 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:26 pm to Clemens
quote:
Top 7 pgs: 1. Cp3 2. Westbrook 3. Rondo 4. T.P. 5. Curry 6. Irving 7. Rose
lol
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:26 pm to shel311
quote:
You can criticize his defense, but he wasn't really inefficient this year, he was solid offensively.
He shot like 33% from 3 and 46% from the floor. I wouldn't call that efficient considering LBJ shot 56% from the floor and the likes of Durant and Parker shot like 52% from the floor. I also believe LBJ shot like 40% from 3 as well.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:27 pm to shel311
quote:
and he played with Tim Duncan. But you feel like Paul should do the same with Blake griffin. That couldn't be more illogical, unless you think griffin is an all time great?
The "3rd best player in the NBA" should be able to carry his team out of the 1st round of the playoffs against a lower seeded team.
quote:
its irrelevant because you know the answer proves your logic to be silly
If Paul played like shite but carried a team to a championship, he would absolutely be considered better in my book. It means he can make others around him better. Which is the job of the point guard anyway and it's something he hasn't been able to do thus far in his career.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:28 pm to Louie T
quote:
I like how one round further and still coming away empty handed is considered "leading a team to success".
Chris Paul has never made a conference finals.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:28 pm to Ostrich
I have nothing left to say here other than this gif.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:28 pm to Ostrich
quote:
It means he can make others around him better.
Literally only one or two players in the NBA over the past decade have done this better than Paul.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:30 pm to boXerrumble
quote:look at his teams, pretty simple.
But why don't his teams succeed? Again, judging him based off "the best PG in the NBA" standards.
The only PG to really succeed recently is Parker. Look at his team.
Rondo won one and had some other close years. Look at his teammates.
Now look at Paul's.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:30 pm to GeauxWarrior12
quote:
Kobe Bryant being in the top 5 is a joke
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:31 pm to dj30
quote:Whoops... been drinking
Chris Paul has never made a conference finals.
Either way, anyone who is even the slightest bit competitive doesn't care about making the finals. I wouldn't consider that leading a team to success.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 5:33 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:31 pm to dj30
quote:
Chris Paul has never made a conference finals.
Chris Paul took a Vinny Del Negro coached team to the second round.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:32 pm to GeauxWarrior12
quote:one can not be in Lebron or Kd's league and still be fairly efficient
He shot like 33% from 3 and 46% from the floor. I wouldn't call that efficient considering LBJ shot 56% from the floor and the likes of Durant and Parker shot like 52% from the floor. I also believe LBJ shot like 40% from 3 as well
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:33 pm to Ostrich
quote:ok, I think we're done with this one.
If Paul played like shite but carried a team to a championship, he would absolutely be considered better in my book. It means he can make others around him better. Which is the job of the point guard anyway and it's something he hasn't been able to do thus far in his career.
Holy shite LOL
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:33 pm to shel311
quote:
The only PG to really succeed recently is Parker
Boom.
Parker and MAYBE Westbrook are the only PG's I'd take over Paul. I'm not saying he sucks, I'm just saying I'd take a proven winner over him for now.
This post was edited on 5/16/13 at 5:35 pm
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:34 pm to RonBurgundy
quote:not much left that could be said better than that gif after that last post to be honest
I have nothing left to say here other than this gif.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:35 pm to Ostrich
quote:I'd rather have a prime Duncan and Parker than Paul and David West or Paul and Griffin.
Parker and MAYBE Westbrook are the only PG's I'd take over Paul. I'm not saying he sucks, I'm just saying if take a proven winner over him for now.
Posted on 5/16/13 at 5:35 pm to Ostrich
quote:So you just like the guy who has the better teammates is what you're really saying.
I'm just saying I'd take a proven winner over him for now.
Popular
Back to top


1



