- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is the BEST power forward in the NBA right now
Posted on 1/25/12 at 11:23 pm to TheMaverick
Posted on 1/25/12 at 11:23 pm to TheMaverick
quote:
TheMaverick
I'd ask for your top four but I feel as though all the forthcoming lol emoticons might slow the site down.
Posted on 1/25/12 at 11:41 pm to REG861
quote:
Just leave. This board. forever. Please
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:39 am to TheMaverick
quote:
Which is complete shite for a hybrid center/power forward.
his FG% is not great but he gets to the line A LOT, that's what separates him from these other guys with higher FG%s. his points per shot is high
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:46 am to AreJay
Love 9-16 4-6 from 3, 31pts and 10 reb 
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:49 am to tiggerthetooth
You people can say what you want about Dirk, but he is definitely not a true power forward, all his rebs are on the defensive glass anyhow
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:55 am to tiggerthetooth
P. Millsap 12-24, 1-2 3Pt, 31 Pts, 11 Reb, 2 Ast
This post was edited on 1/26/12 at 1:01 am
Posted on 1/26/12 at 4:07 am to Lester Earl
Paul Millsap > everyone else
Posted on 1/26/12 at 7:05 am to VerlanderBEAST
quote:
How is this even a question? it's Dirk
this
Posted on 1/26/12 at 7:13 am to DownSouthCrawfish
quote:
the BEST power forward in the NBA
When he gets back the Grizz will be a force to be reckoned with
This post was edited on 1/26/12 at 7:14 am
Posted on 1/26/12 at 7:18 am to Flatt2Flowers04
i love Zach's game. It seems like he's underrated every year, but his numbers are always consistently good.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 9:50 am to DownSouthCrawfish
Paul Millsap 17.5 PPG 8.9 RPG (2.9 OFF) 74% FT 55% FG 27% 3P (0.7 ATT/Game) -31 MPG
Kevin Love 25.3 PPG 13.7 RPG (4.4 OFF) 80% FT 44% FG 41% 3P (5.2 ATT/Game)-39.7 MPG
Found steals, blocks and assists just about the same
Kevin Love 25.3 PPG 13.7 RPG (4.4 OFF) 80% FT 44% FG 41% 3P (5.2 ATT/Game)-39.7 MPG
Found steals, blocks and assists just about the same
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:54 am to tiggerthetooth
Efficiency per 48 minutes
Forwards
Lebron....40.96
Millsaps..34.46
Love......33.15
the knock on the efficiency rating is that players aren't penalized that much for missed shots. Which benefits Love.
Forwards
Lebron....40.96
Millsaps..34.46
Love......33.15
the knock on the efficiency rating is that players aren't penalized that much for missed shots. Which benefits Love.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 10:59 am to bradwieser
quote:
the knock on the efficiency rating is that players aren't penalized that much for missed shots. Which benefits Love.
how can an efficiency stat not measure missed shots?
what exactly is that stat measuring?
This post was edited on 1/26/12 at 11:00 am
Posted on 1/26/12 at 11:05 am to Lester Earl
it does measure missed shots just gives more value to made shots than penalty for missed. Heres one explanation.
quote:
Under Eff48 every missed field goal costs just one efficiency point, while every made field goal adds at least 2. Thus the formula indirectly rewards shot attempts over shot efficiency.
What’s missing in Eff48 is an acknowledgement of the opportunity cost of missing field goals. A player who takes 15 two-point shots and makes just 5 of them has theoretically cost his team at least twice as many potential points (20) as he has delivered in actual points (10). Therefore the true productive value of his field goal attempts should be somewhere in the red, yet under Eff48 he breaks even.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 11:49 am to bradwieser
quote:
Efficiency per 48 minutes
Forwards
Lebron....40.96
Millsaps..34.46
Love......33.15
the knock on the efficiency rating is that players aren't penalized that much for missed shots. Which benefits Love.
Thats using which index? Hollinger's PER is different from say NBA.com's PER. Love has a higher efficiency on NBA.com than Millsap. Lebron is NOT a PF, and i do not include him in this debate.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:25 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What kind of power forward shoots under 43%?
quote:
I'd take Amare,
shooting 42%, if nobody has pointed it out yet
Before last night, he was over 43%. Besides he also plays better defense than Love.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:27 pm to TheMaverick
"Amare" and "defense" should never be used in the same paragraph unless there's a "doesn't play" somewhere in there.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:28 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
you named one thing Milsaps does better than Love, and even that is debatable. How in your own mind can you call him better if all he does is defend better, according to you?
He is a far more efficient scorer that's for damn sure. So he's better at defense and offense than him. That's two thirds of the game. Rebounding numbers would be closer if 1. Millsap played as much as Love does per game and 2. Millsap played some center like Love does.
Posted on 1/26/12 at 12:29 pm to Chemical Toilet
with Rubio and Love, the T-Wolves have a great inside-outide game going on, much better than I though it would be.
Popular
Back to top



0




