- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What will this years excuse be to put in an undeserving team into CFP?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:07 pm to ReauxlTide222
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:07 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Asking you what you think or would want the pre-determined criteria to be is in no way shape or form a stupid question.
That isn't what you asked.
Here is what you asked:
quote:
What should the pre-defined criteria entail?
1
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:08 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
The only reason why any of you are bitching is because this is a rival school that's doing all of this. That alone invalidates your argument.
Wrong.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:14 pm to RollTide1987
The playoff d like would have been using the current NCAA Bylaws covering championships
Conference reps picked by each conference based on what they commit to before the season starts
First round games be campus sites
NY6 and other big bowls be the 2nd round on
Independents can gain entry only by committee
No limit on teams in Conferences
Using last years Committee rankings and Bylaws of NCAA
Auto Qualifiers:
AAC: Central Florida
ACC: Clemson
B1G: tOSU
BIG XII: OU
CUSA: FAU
MAC: Toledo
MWC: Boise
PAC: USC
SEC. UGA
SBC: Troy
At-Large Selections:
Alabama
Wisconsin
Auburn
Penn St
Miami
Washington
Stanford
Notre Dame
TCU
Michigan St
LSU
Wazzu
Oklahoma St
Memphis
Northwestern
The Bracket would have been this
LSU @ Michigan St, winner plays Clemson
Toledo @ Penn St, winner plays USC
Memphis @ Stanford, winner plays Alabama
Boise @ UCF, winner plays Ohio St
Wazzu @ TCU, winner plays Oklahoma
FAU @ Miami, winner plays Auburn
Memphis @ Notre Dame, winner plays Georgia
Troy @ Washington, winner plays Wisconsin
Before you complain about terrible games in round 1, there are pitiful games in every opening round of a seeded tournament
Conference reps picked by each conference based on what they commit to before the season starts
First round games be campus sites
NY6 and other big bowls be the 2nd round on
Independents can gain entry only by committee
No limit on teams in Conferences
Using last years Committee rankings and Bylaws of NCAA
Auto Qualifiers:
AAC: Central Florida
ACC: Clemson
B1G: tOSU
BIG XII: OU
CUSA: FAU
MAC: Toledo
MWC: Boise
PAC: USC
SEC. UGA
SBC: Troy
At-Large Selections:
Alabama
Wisconsin
Auburn
Penn St
Miami
Washington
Stanford
Notre Dame
TCU
Michigan St
LSU
Wazzu
Oklahoma St
Memphis
Northwestern
The Bracket would have been this
LSU @ Michigan St, winner plays Clemson
Toledo @ Penn St, winner plays USC
Memphis @ Stanford, winner plays Alabama
Boise @ UCF, winner plays Ohio St
Wazzu @ TCU, winner plays Oklahoma
FAU @ Miami, winner plays Auburn
Memphis @ Notre Dame, winner plays Georgia
Troy @ Washington, winner plays Wisconsin
Before you complain about terrible games in round 1, there are pitiful games in every opening round of a seeded tournament
This post was edited on 8/13/18 at 2:18 pm
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:17 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
What do you think or what do you want want the pre-determined criteria to be?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:19 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
"But, but, but....they're Alabama..."
The last two B1G teams to make the playoff both got shut out.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:20 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
What do you think or what do you want want the pre-determined criteria to be?
Under the current structure, or do I get control of that, too?
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:20 pm to Othello
quote:
B1G teams
CFSB.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:21 pm to Othello
DB in 2016: "Winning your conference doesn't matter."
DB in 2017: "Winning your conference matters."
DB in 2017: "Winning your conference matters."
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:22 pm to Korin
quote:
DB in 2016: "Winning your conference doesn't matter."
DB in 2017: "Winning your conference matters."
Stop making shite up.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:24 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Current structure as far as the conferences and their divisions go.
I doubt those are changed anytime soon.
I doubt those are changed anytime soon.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:25 pm to ReauxlTide222
I guess you could add all division winners and if conference doesn’t have divisions let conference decide how they want to be repped. That seems fair, to me.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:35 pm to sms151t
quote:Do the bylaws dictate that there should be a certain amount of at-large teams? I'd prefer two (make it a 12-team tournament), if possible.
the current NCAA Bylaws covering championships
This post was edited on 8/13/18 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:37 pm to G The Tiger Fan
quote:Different sides of the bracket? Sweet revenge for the Tigers in the national championship game!
LSU @ Michigan St, winner plays Clemson
Toledo @ Penn St, winner plays USC
Memphis @ Stanford, winner plays Alabama
Boise @ UCF, winner plays Ohio St
Wazzu @ TCU, winner plays Oklahoma
FAU @ Miami, winner plays Auburn
Memphis @ Notre Dame, winner plays Georgia
Troy @ Washington, winner plays Wisconsin
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:40 pm to G The Tiger Fan
Yes it’s a percentage of teams involved in the sport
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:42 pm to G The Tiger Fan
The only way you can do 12 I think is let conference determine its lone rep then 2 at larges based on committee. If that happened I think Independents will say screw this and we will be back to lawsuits that UGA and OU filed in 80’s
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:43 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Current structure as far as the conferences and their divisions go.
I doubt those are changed anytime soon.
The current structure is garbage for determining a national champion, so we might as well just do champions for the Power Four and then the next two highest ranked from the rest based on a heavily modified BcS formula.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:52 pm to sms151t
quote:Forgive me for not remembering those. I was 7 in 1989.
The only way you can do 12 I think is let conference determine its lone rep then 2 at larges based on committee. If that happened I think Independents will say screw this and we will be back to lawsuits that UGA and OU filed in 80’s
ETA: Army and Navy can join CUSA, Notre Dame will be fine or they should join the Big 10 or ACC, and BYU can wait until they pass away, they'll be a god of their own planet and then they can set their playoff however they want.
This post was edited on 8/13/18 at 2:57 pm
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:54 pm to sms151t
Oh, and just to be a jerk, Northwestern looks like the first one out instead of being the last one in on your list.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:54 pm to RollTide1987
quote:
I think we can all agree that if this current dynasty Alabama is in the midst of were happening at LSU, you'd be defending LSU's inclusion in the rematch in 2011 and in the playoffs last year.
LSU wouldn't have gotten a rematch in 2011, so no. Every LSU fan I know knows this and would have accepted a trip to the Sugar Bowl had we lost to Bama on the road in 2011. That is how it was supposed to work when "every game counts".
quote:
The only reason why any of you are bitching is because this is a rival school that's doing all of this.
You must not have been posting here when the Media was working to change the rules in 2003 so another darling, USC, could "win" despite not meeting the expectations of the system laid out at the time. You know, not enough quality wins. We had to change that too...
Thus the point of the thread.
Posted on 8/13/18 at 2:57 pm to G The Tiger Fan
They are I miscounted before doing the bracket. I forgot Boise needed to a lot in at 20 instead of 24 initially
This post was edited on 8/13/18 at 2:59 pm
Page 8 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News