- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What team was better Fab5 or last year Kentucky?
Posted on 3/7/11 at 9:09 pm to BehindtheWoodshed
Posted on 3/7/11 at 9:09 pm to BehindtheWoodshed
quote:
I think Demarcus Cousins could end up being the best from both of those teams
doubt it
he probably will end up like Derrick Coleman
Posted on 3/8/11 at 12:10 am to lsucub57
quote:
What team was better Fab5 or last year Kentucky?
I know Fab 5 got more hype but I think Ken fresh were better
seriously????
Posted on 3/8/11 at 12:28 am to lsucub57
Fab5 by far, the team that lost to an all-time back-to-back '91-'92 NCAA Champ Duke in 1992, and absolutely loaded UNC Sr laden team in 1993..it's not even close.
The Fab 5 would've smoked Wall and Co by 12+ in a tourney game.
Fab 5 navigated to b-2-b title games as Frosh and Sophs, at a time when NCAA Hoops still meant something, before the NBA's raids had sucked the life outta NCAA Hoops fully. Back when many teams still had many 20-22 yr old players.
The Fab 5 would've smoked Wall and Co by 12+ in a tourney game.
Fab 5 navigated to b-2-b title games as Frosh and Sophs, at a time when NCAA Hoops still meant something, before the NBA's raids had sucked the life outta NCAA Hoops fully. Back when many teams still had many 20-22 yr old players.
Posted on 3/8/11 at 12:43 am to Kracka
quote:
I don't even think KY team last year is an all time top 10 team.
Not even close
Posted on 3/8/11 at 5:18 am to jg8623
Ask Joe Mazzulla and Dasean Butler how good Kentucky was last year. 

Posted on 3/8/11 at 6:48 am to lsucub57
quote:
What team was better Fab5 or last year Kentucky?
Im talking about there freshman year.
2 seconds of thought would have told you that Mich fab 5 made it to back to back NC games as fresh and soph whereas that UK team made it to the elite eight. Not only that, but UK didnt even start 5 freshman so I dont understand the relevance of comparing 5 freshmen to UK's mixed age squad. Even so, Mich was better anyway. Greatest class ever recruited
Posted on 3/8/11 at 7:50 am to Bho
quote:
Bho
Kentucky Fan
Lexington, Ky
Member since Dec 2007
5451 posts

This post was edited on 3/8/11 at 7:51 am
Posted on 3/8/11 at 8:13 am to lsucub57
2008 Memphis was better than both
Posted on 3/8/11 at 9:16 am to lsucub57
Ill take Memphis 07-08 over Kentucky
neither as good as Fab 5 regardless
neither as good as Fab 5 regardless
This post was edited on 3/8/11 at 9:17 am
Posted on 3/8/11 at 9:19 am to Bho
quote:
rank wise, no. Reality wise, tbd.
So basically no.
Posted on 3/8/11 at 9:33 am to iwyLSUiwy
Fab Five Draft:
1st overall - Chris Webber
5th overall - JuJuan Howard
13th overall - Jalen Rose
2nd round, 6th pick - Jimmy King
Ray Jackson was not drafted nor ever played in the NBA.
1st overall - Chris Webber
5th overall - JuJuan Howard
13th overall - Jalen Rose
2nd round, 6th pick - Jimmy King
Ray Jackson was not drafted nor ever played in the NBA.
Posted on 3/8/11 at 12:03 pm to bringonusc
Most ppl forget the Fab Five was just seeded as 6 seed in the 1992 Tournament.
They were impressive, but the Fab Five is a little over hyped.
They were impressive, but the Fab Five is a little over hyped.
Posted on 3/8/11 at 12:27 pm to CM84
quote:
Most ppl forget the Fab Five was just seeded as 6 seed in the 1992 Tournament.
And you may be forgetting just how deep the college hoops landscape was back then, how matured and savvy the teams, how old most were, how many 7-fters and "true big men" there were and how they could play with their backs to the basket(unlike today's players) , and how many guys on the better teams would've been current current NBA'ers, if in this era.
How coaches weren't hamstringed by the 20 hr rule, or lack of enforcement to such rules back then. How players back then actually practiced endless FT shooting, used the glass, played more brutally physical compared to today's game, etc..
Granted, many from that era would gas fast if running with today's kids and game, if not without more modern aerobic training and conditioning.
This post was edited on 3/8/11 at 12:32 pm
Back to top
